Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dis Markers ; 2021: 5597028, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34046097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common and severe complication in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Increased amount of circulatory small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) particles is known to be a sign of dyslipidemia and can result in atherosclerosis. However, the association between serum sdLDL-C levels and CHD in T2DM patients remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 3684 T2DM patients who received selective coronary angiography (CAG) were selected. For analyzing the association between sdLDL-C and CHD severity in T2DM, the patients with CHD were further divided into four subgroups according to the quartiles of sdLDL-C. A multivariate logistic regression was used for analyzing the risks and severity of CHD. A total of 3427 patients with continuous stable CHD were recruited and followed up for 5 years. RESULTS: Serum sdLDL-C levels in the CHD group were significantly increased compared with those in the non-CHD group [0.80 (0.49) mmol/L vs. 0.70 (0.30) mmol/L, p < 0.001]. The results from CHD subgroup analysis indicated that the sdLDL-C levels in patients with multiple-vessel disease and high Gensini score (GS) were significantly increased. By adjusting the confounding factors and analyzing with multiple logistic regression, we found that sdLDL-C independently correlated with the presence and severity of CHD (CHD: OR = 2.257; multiple-vessel disease: OR = 3.288; high GS: OR = 2.554). A total of 484 major cardiovascular events (MACEs) were documented. After Kaplan-Meier analysis and chi-squared analysis, the incidence of MACEs in the high sdLDL-C group was higher than that in the low sdLDL-C group (16.04% vs. 12.25%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In T2DM patients, elevated serum sdLDL-C may increase the severity of CHD and predict cardiovascular events in the future. Therefore, serum sdLDL-C may be a potential biomarker for the surveillance of CHD in T2DM patients.


Subject(s)
Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Patient Acuity , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , Coronary Artery Disease/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
2.
Dis Markers ; 2020: 3424039, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32454904

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test in urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1318 patients who performed the NMP22 BladderChek tests. Of them, 103 were primary UC patients, 90 were surgical treatment UC patients, and 1125 were benign disease patients. The performance of the NMP22 BladderChek test for the diagnosis of primary and recurrent UC was evaluated. Moreover, the performance of urine cytology and the NMP22 BladderChek test for the diagnosis of primary UC was compared in 90 available subjects including 48 primary UC patients and 42 benign disease patients. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 37.9% and 95.8%, respectively, for the diagnosis of primary UC (n = 1228). The corresponding parameters of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 31.0% and 88.5%, respectively, for the diagnosis of recurrent UC (n = 90). The sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology were 54.2% and 97.6%, respectively, for the diagnosis of primary UC (n = 90); the corresponding parameters of the NMP22 BladderChek test were 41.7% and 83.3%, respectively; the corresponding parameters of the two tests combination were 64.6% and 83.3%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the performance between the NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology or the combination of two tests (P = 0.017 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The NMP22 BladderChek test has a low sensitivity for detecting primary and recurrent UC. Urine cytology is superior to the NMP22 BladderChek test, and combined use of the two tests improves the sensitivity in the detection of primary UC.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Histocytochemistry/methods , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Ureteral Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Female , Humans , Kidney Pelvis/metabolism , Kidney Pelvis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/urine , Nuclear Proteins/urine , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ureteral Neoplasms/genetics , Ureteral Neoplasms/pathology , Ureteral Neoplasms/urine , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/urine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...