In vitro lipid transfer assays of phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins provide insight into the in vivo mechanism of ligand transfer.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays and membrane binding determinations were performed using three phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins, including the yeast Sec14 and two mammalian proteins PITPα and PITPß. These proteins were able to specifically bind the fluorescent phosphatidylcholine analogue NBD-PC ((2-(12-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)dodecanoyl-1-hexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine)) and to transfer it to small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs). Rate constants for transfer to vesicles comprising 100% PC were slower for all proteins than when increasing percentages of phosphatidylinositol were incorporated into the same SUVs. The rates of ligand transfer by Sec14 were insensitive to the inclusion of equimolar amounts of another anionic phospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS), but the rates of ligand transfer by both mammalian PITPs were strikingly enhanced by the inclusion of phosphatidic acid (PA) in the receptor SUV. Binding of Sec14 to immobilized bilayers was substantial, while that of PITPα and PITPß was 3-7 times weaker than Sec14 depending on phospholipid composition. When small proportions of the phosphoinositide PI(4)P were included in receptor SUVs (either with PI or not), Sec14 showed substantially increased rates of NBD-PC pick-up, whereas the PITPs were unaffected. The data are supportive of a role for PITPß as functional PI transfer protein in vivo, but that Sec14 likely has a more elaborate function.

Ligand and membrane-binding behavior of the phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins PITPα and PITPß.

Phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins (PITPs) are believed to be lipid transfer proteins because of their ability to transfer either phosphatidylinositol (PI) or phosphatidylcholine (PC) between membrane compartments, in vitro. However, the detailed mechanism of this transfer process is not fully established. To further understand the transfer mechanism of PITPs we examined the interaction of PITPs with membranes using dual polarization interferometry (DPI), which measures protein binding affinity on a flat immobilized lipid surface. In addition, a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay was also employed to monitor how quickly PITPs transfer their ligands to lipid vesicles. DPI analysis revealed that PITPß had a higher affinity to membranes compared with PITPα. Furthermore, the FRET-based transfer assay revealed that PITPß has a higher ligand transfer rate compared with PITPα. However, both PITPα and PITPß demonstrated a preference for highly curved membrane surfaces during ligand transfer. In other words, ligand transfer rate was higher when the accepting vesicles were highly curved.

2,2'-Bis(monoacylglycero) PO4 (BMP), but Not 3,1'-BMP, increases membrane curvature stress to enhance α-tocopherol transfer protein binding to membranes.

Previous work revealed that α-tocopherol transfer protein (α-TTP) co-localizes with bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate (BMP) in late endosomes. BMP is a lipid unique to late endosomes and is believed to induce membrane curvature and support the multivesicular nature of this organelle. We examined the effect of BMP on α-TTP binding to membranes using dual polarization interferometry and vesicle-binding assay. α-TTP binding to membranes is increased by the curvature-inducing lipid BMP. α-TTP binds to membranes with greater affinity when they contain the 2,2'-BMP versus 3,1'-BMP isomers.

The contribution of surface residues to membrane binding and ligand transfer by the α-tocopherol transfer protein (α-TTP).

Previous work has shown that the α-tocopherol transfer protein (α-TTP) can bind to vesicular or immobilized phospholipid membranes. Revealing the molecular mechanisms by which α-TTP associates with membranes is thought to be critical to understanding its function and role in the secretion of tocopherol from hepatocytes into the circulation. Calculations presented in the Orientations of Proteins in Membranes database have provided a testable model for the spatial arrangement of α-TTP and other CRAL-TRIO family proteins with respect to the lipid bilayer. These calculations predicted that a hydrophobic surface mediates the interaction of α-TTP with lipid membranes. To test the validity of these predictions, we used site-directed mutagenesis and examined the substituted mutants with regard to intermembrane ligand transfer, association with lipid layers and biological activity in cultured hepatocytes. Substitution of residues in helices A8 (F165A and F169A) and A10 (I202A, V206A and M209A) decreased the rate of intermembrane ligand transfer as well as protein adsorption to phospholipid bilayers. The largest impairment was observed upon mutation of residues that are predicted to be fully immersed in the lipid bilayer in both apo (open) and holo (closed) conformations such as Phe165 and Phe169. Mutation F169A, and especially F169D, significantly impaired α-TTP-assisted secretion of α-tocopherol outside cultured hepatocytes. Mutation of selected basic residues (R192H, K211A, and K217A) had little effect on transfer rates, indicating no significant involvement of nonspecific electrostatic interactions with membranes.