MR Imaging Features of Critical Spinal Demyelinating Lesions Associated with Progressive Motor Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Progressive MS is typically heralded by a myelopathic pattern of asymmetric progressive motor weakness. Focal individual "critical" demyelinating spinal cord lesions anatomically associated with progressive motor impairment may be a compelling explanation for this clinical presentation as described in progressive solitary sclerosis (single CNS demyelinating lesion), progressive demyelination with highly restricted MR imaging lesion burden (2-5 total CNS demyelinating lesions; progressive paucisclerotic MS), and progressive, exclusively unilateral hemi- or monoparetic MS (>5 CNS demyelinating progressive unilateral hemi- or monoparetic MS [PUHMS] lesions). Critical demyelinating lesions appear strikingly similar across these cohorts, and we describe their specific spinal cord MR imaging characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational MR imaging study comparing spinal cord critical demyelinating lesions anatomically associated with progressive motor impairment with any additional "noncritical" (not anatomically associated with progressive motor impairment) spinal cord demyelinating lesions. All spinal cord MR images (302 cervical and 91 thoracic) were reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist with final radiologic assessment on the most recent MR imaging. Anatomic association with clinical progressive motor impairment was confirmed independently by MS subspecialists. RESULTS: Ninety-one individuals (PUHMS, 37 [41%], progressive paucisclerosis 35 [38%], progressive solitary sclerosis 19 [21%]) with 91 critical and 98 noncritical spinal cord MR imaging demyelinating lesions were evaluated. MR imaging characteristics that favored critical spinal cord demyelinating lesions over noncritical lesions included moderate-to-severe, focal, lesion-associated spinal cord atrophy: 41/91 (45%) versus 0/98 (0%) (OR, 161.91; 9.43 to >999.9); lateral column axial location (OR, 10.43; 3.88-28.07); central region (OR, 3.23; 1.78-5.88); ventral column (OR, 2.98; 1.55-5.72); and larger lesion size of the axial width (OR, 2.01;1.49-2.72), transverse axial size (OR, 1.66; 1.36-2.01), or lesion area (OR, 1.14; 1.08-1.2). Multiple regression analysis revealed focal atrophy and lateral axial location as having the strongest association with critical demyelinating lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Focal, lesion-associated atrophy, lateral column axial location, and larger lesion size are spinal cord MR imaging characteristics of critical demyelinating lesions. The presence of critical demyelinating lesions should be sought as these features may be associated with the development of progressive motor impairment in MS.

Spinal cord and brain corticospinal tract lesions are associated with motor progression in tumefactive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord lesions have been associated with progressive disease in individuals with typical relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: In the current study, we aimed to determine if progressive disease is associated with spinal cord lesions in those with tumefactive multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of individuals presenting to Mayo Clinic with tumefactive MS with spinal cord MRIs available (n=159). Clinical data were extracted by chart review. Brain and spinal cord MRIs were reviewed to characterize the tumefactive demyelinating lesion(s) and assess the burden of spinal cord disease. RESULTS: A total of 69 (43%) had spinal cord lesions. Progressive demyelinating disease was documented in 13 (8%); the majority (11/13) with secondary progressive disease. The method of progression was myelopathic in 8/13 (62%), cognitive in 3/13 (23%), motor from a supratentorial lesion in 2/13 (16%). EDSS at last follow-up was higher in those with progression than those without (median 6.0 (2.0-10.0) vs. 2.5 (0-10.0), p = < 0.001). Progressive demyelinating disease occurred in a minority. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with progression typically experienced progressive motor impairment, and this occurred exclusively in individuals with lesions in the corticospinal tracts of the brain and/or the spinal cord.

Progressive motor impairment from "critical" demyelinating lesions of the cervicomedullary junction.

BACKGROUND: Progressive motor impairment anatomically associated with a "critical" lesion has been described in primary demyelinating disease. Most "critical" lesions occur within the spinal cord. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and radiological features of "critical" lesions of the cervicomedullary junction (CMJ). METHODS: Observational study on people presenting with a CMJ lesion associated with primary demyelinating disease-related progressive motor impairment. Clinical data were extracted by chart review. Brain and spinal cord magnetic resonance images were reviewed to characterize the CMJ lesion and determine additional demyelination burden. RESULTS: Forty-one people were included: 29 (71%) had progression from onset and 12 (29%) had a relapse onset (secondary progressive) course. Most had progressive hemiparesis (21 (51%)) or progressive quadriparesis (15 (37%)) with a median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 5.5 (2.0-8.5) at last follow-up. No "critical" CMJ lesion enhanced; most were bilateral (25 (61%)). Brain magnetic resonance images were otherwise normal in 16 (39%) or with a restricted demyelination burden in 15 (37%). Cervical and thoracic cord MRIs were without additional lesions in 25 (61%) and 22/37 (59%), respectively. CONCLUSION: CMJ "critical" lesions can correlate with progressive motor impairment even with few or no additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions. Lesion location is an important determinant of progressive motor impairment in demyelinating disease.

Cerebrospinal fluid evaluation in patients with progressive motor impairment due to critical central nervous system demyelinating lesions.

BACKGROUND: Elevated intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG; oligoclonal bands (OCBs)) or IgG in people with progressive motor impairment due to "critical" demyelinating lesions are of uncertain significance. OBJECTIVE: Compare clinical/radiological features of people with "critical" demyelinating lesion-induced progressive motor impairment with/without elevated intrathecal IgG synthesis. METHODS: A total of 133 people with progressive motor impairment attributable to "critical" demyelinating lesions (corticospinal tract location, consistent with the progressive motor deficit) were compared regarding clinical and radiological presentation with and without ≥2 unique cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) OCB and/or IgG index ≥0.85. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (74%) had CSF-elevated OCB and/or IgG index, higher with increased magnetic resonance imaging-lesion burden. No differences were found with/without CSF abnormalities in sex (46 of 98 female (47%) vs. 22 of 35 (63%), p = 0.11), onset-age (median 49 vs. 50 years, p = 0.5), progression from onset (62 of 98 (63%) vs. 25 of 35 (71%)), progression post-relapse (36 of 98 (37%) vs. 10 of 35 (29%), p = 0.4), and duration between demyelinating disease onset and CSF examination (30 (0-359) vs. 48 (0-323) months p = 0.7). "Critical" lesions were radiologically similar, most commonly cervical spine located (72 of 98 (74%) vs. 19 of 35 (54%), p = 0.18) both with/without CSF abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: People with "critical" demyelinating lesion-induced progressive motor impairment typically have elevated intrathecal IgG (OCB and/or IgG) and similar clinical and radiological presentation regardless of CSF findings, therefore representing valid presentations of progressive demyelinating disease.