Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 25(6): 468-71, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15242193

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Surgical-site infection (SSI) is a serious and costly complication following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We analyzed surgical factors, microbiology, and complications at a 608-bed community teaching hospital to identify opportunities for prevention. METHODS: All patients undergoing CABG procedures from June 1997 through December 2000 were analyzed. Hospital records and postdischarge surveillance data were reviewed for demographics, surgical information, timing and classification of infection, microbiology, and bacteremic events. RESULTS: Of 3,443 patients undergoing CABG, sternal SSI developed in 122 (3.5%); 71 (58.2%) were classified as superficial SSI and 51 (41.8%) as deep SSI. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was employed in all cases. On average, infection occurred 21.5 days (range, 4 to 315) after CABG. Most cases were diagnosed on readmission (59%); 20 cases (16%) were identified by postdischarge surveillance. Microbiological data were positive in 109 (89.3%), with a single pathogen implicated in most (86.2%). Gram-positive cocci were most frequently recovered (81%); gram-negative bacilli (17%), gram-positive bacilli (1%), and yeast (1%) were less common. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated pathogen (49%). Bacteremia was noted in 22 instances (18%). It was significantly associated with deep SSI (P =. 002) and identified only in S. aureus cases. CONCLUSIONS: SSI complicated 3.5% of the procedures. S. aureus was implicated in most of the cases and was significantly associated with deep SSI. It was the only pathogen associated with secondary bacteremia. In addition to standard guidelines, targeted methods against S. aureus should help reduce the overall rate of SSI.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medical Records , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Sentinel Surveillance , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Sternum , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Time Factors
2.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ; 11(1): 53-7, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12839633

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pyogenic sacroiliitis occurs infrequently during the peripartum period. CASE: A case at our institution and a review of the literature were analyzed. A total of 15 cases were discovered. The onset of illness was during pregnancy (40% of cases), within 3 weeks postpartum (40%) or post-abortion (20%), and the presentation was usually acute (< 7 days in 67% of cases). Frequent manifestations included localized pain in the hips or buttock, sacroiliac joint tenderness and fever. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging revealed joint involvement in all cases tested. Microbiology was confirmed by blood (40%) or joint aspirate (75%), and most patients were treated with antibiotics. Surgical intervention took place in five cases. Preterm labor was reported in only one case. All patients responded well to therapy without locomotive disability, and persistent pain was uncommon. CONCLUSION: Septic sacroiliitis should be considered in peripartum patients who present with fever and severe localized pain. Medical management is usually curative, and without an adverse effect on pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Outcome , Sacroiliac Joint/physiopathology , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Infectious/drug therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Can J Microbiol ; 48(4): 369-73, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12030711

ABSTRACT

The utility of a pre-optimized kit for random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was assessed in typing diverse strains of Candida albicans from epidemiologically unrelated inpatients (interpatient analysis) and in detecting clonal variations that maybe present within individual patient isolates (intrapatient analysis). Stool samples from inpatients were cultured on Inhibitory Mold agar. Nine individual colonies from all patients with > or =9 colonies of C. albicans (n = 18) were selected, frozen, and karyotyped using CHEF genomic DNA plug kits and CHEF-DRIII. Each of the selected colonies was then analyzed by RAPD, utilizing the selected kit, with 6 primers. Interpatient analysis revealed 9 karyotypes and 17 RAPD composites. RAPD discrimination was significantly better (p < 0.001). Intrapatient analysis revealed 34 (21%) and 33 (20.4%) variants among 162 colonies tested by RAPD and karyotyping, respectively. The results were discordant in 25 variants, all with differences of 1-3 bands. These results illustrate that this pre-optimized kit for RAPD provides excellent discrimination of genetically unrelated strains. Its performance in delineating subtle clonal differences was comparable with karyotyping; both methods failed to detect all minor genetic variations. The ease of use and quick turnaround time of this kit offer a practical and reliable method for typing diverse strains of C. albicans, but may be inadequate for assessing microevolution.


Subject(s)
Candida albicans/classification , DNA, Fungal/analysis , Candida albicans/genetics , Candidiasis/microbiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Feces/microbiology , Genetic Testing , Genotype , Karyotyping , Mycological Typing Techniques , Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 23(1): 23-6, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11868888

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of stool colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) and their families. DESIGN: Prospective assessment of fecal colonization with VRE. SETTING: A 603-bed, tertiary-care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy volunteers recruited from hospital employees and their households were screened to exclude pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive disorders, and recent use of antimicrobials. INTERVENTION: Self-obtained stool swabs were used to obtain cultures. Isolated enterococci were screened for vancomycin resistance and species were identified. Intra-household isolates were genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: The participants (n = 228; age range, 28 days to 80 years) were from 137 households with and 91 without employees who had contact with patients. Enterococcus species were isolated from 127 stool specimens (55.7%). VRE were detected in 12 individuals, representing 6 E. casseliflavus, 5 E. faecium, and 1 E. gallinarum. VRE were more commonly isolated in employees who had contact with patients (5 of 52 vs 0 of 40; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.5 to 2.2; P = .07) and their household members (10 of 137 vs 2 of 91; RR, 3.3; CI95, 0.7 to 14.8; P = .13). In 2 households (2 adults in a physician's household and an adult plus a child in a nurse's household) PFGE analysis demonstrated identical intra-household strains of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. CONCLUSIONS: VRE colonization was found in 5.3% of screened stools and was more prevalent in HCWs who had contact with patients and their households. Identical PFGE patterns between 2 employees who had contact with patients and their household members demonstrated probable intra-household spread. Although the mode of acquisition was uncertain, the association with employees who had contact with patients suggests possible occupational sources. These findings demonstrate the spread of VRE within the household and implicate occupational risk for its acquisition.


Subject(s)
Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Personnel, Hospital , Vancomycin Resistance , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Enterococcus/drug effects , Family , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...