Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 23(4): 528-35, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24188683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rate of acute infection after surgery for proximal humeral fractures is not known. The aims of this study were to report the incidence and to analyze the risk factors for infection after proximal humeral fracture treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a retrospective multicenter study of 452 proximal humeral fractures. Data were modeled by use of univariate and/or linear regression analyses to determine the odds ratio (OR). A logistic regression analysis was used to check for demographic and other characteristics with the potential to confound a true association between risk factors and infection. RESULTS: The mean age was 62.1 years, and 314 patients were female patients. Of the patients, 18 (4%) had an acute infection. The factors that correlated with infection were length of surgery (OR, 1.009; P = .05), preoperative skin preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate (OR, 0.13; P = .008), and prophylactic antibiotic (OR, 10.73; P = .03). The delay to surgery was close to achieving significance (OR, 1.71; P = .06). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that washing the shoulder with chlorhexidine gluconate and avoiding the use of first-generation cephalosporin in favor of more effective prophylactic therapy are effective at reducing the risk of infection after treatment for proximal humeral fractures.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation/adverse effects , Shoulder Fractures/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Young Adult
2.
Pain Res Treat ; 2012: 426130, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23213512

ABSTRACT

Fibromyalgia syndrome is mainly characterized by pain, fatigue, and sleep disruption. The etiology of fibromyalgia is still unclear: if central sensitization is considered to be the main mechanism involved, then many other factors, genetic, immunological, and hormonal, may play an important role. The diagnosis is typically clinical (there are no laboratory abnormalities) and the physician must concentrate on pain and on its features. Additional symptoms (e.g., Raynaud's phenomenon, irritable bowel disease, and heat and cold intolerance) can be associated with this condition. A careful differential diagnosis is mandatory: fibromyalgia is not a diagnosis of exclusion. Since 1990, diagnosis has been principally based on the two major diagnostic criteria defined by the ACR. Recently, new criteria have been proposed. The main goals of the treatment are to alleviate pain, increase restorative sleep, and improve physical function. A multidisciplinary approach is optimal. While most nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids have limited benefit, an important role is played by antidepressants and neuromodulating antiepileptics: currently duloxetine (NNT for a 30% pain reduction 7.2), milnacipran (NNT 19), and pregabalin (NNT 8.6) are the only drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of fibromyalgia. In addition, nonpharmacological treatments should be associated with drug therapy.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...