ABSTRACT
Cardiac tissue engineering by means of synthetic or natural scaffolds combined with stem/progenitor cells is emerging as the response to the unsatisfactory outcome of approaches based solely on the injection of cells. Parenchymal and supporting cells are surrounded, in vivo, by a specialized and tissue-specific microenvironment, consisting mainly of extracellular matrix (ECM) and soluble factors incorporated in the ECM. Since the naturally occurring ECM is the ideal platform for ensuring cell engraftment, survival, proliferation, and differentiation, the acellular native ECM appears by far the most promising and appealing substrate among all biomaterials tested so far. To obtain intact scaffold of human native cardiac ECM while preserving its composition, we compared the decellularized ECM (d-ECM) produced through five different protocols of decellularization (named Pr1, Pr2, Pr3, Pr4, and Pr5) in terms of efficiency of decellularization, composition, and three-dimensional architecture of d-ECM scaffolds and of their suitability for cell repopulation. The decellularization procedures proved substantially different. Specifically, only three, of the five protocols tested, proved effective in producing thoroughly acellular d-ECM. In addition, the d-ECM delivered differed in architecture and composition and, more importantly, in its ability to support engraftment, survival, and differentiation of cardiac primitive cells in vitro.
