ABSTRACT
In this case report, we discuss a rare incident of avulsion-type renal injury in a 24-year-old male with no significant medical history. The injury occurred during a traffic accident, where he was involved in a direct impact collision between a motorcycle and a vehicle, leading to altered corticomedullary differentiation in the right kidney, a retroperitoneal hematoma, and free fluid in the cavity. The patient underwent successful emergency abdominal surgery, which involved the removal of the damaged kidney due to the severity of the injury. During his postoperative recovery in the ICU, he received extensive care, including sedation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support. Ultimately, he made a successful recovery and was discharged after rehabilitation. This case highlights the complexities involved in managing patients with renal injuries resulting from high-energy impact accidents. It emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment, the challenges associated with deciding on surgical intervention, and the significance of rehabilitation in patient recovery. The uniqueness of this case, characterized by its distinct mechanism of injury and the severity of the trauma, contributes to our broader understanding of renal trauma management in the field of trauma medicine. It underscores the need for personalized patient care strategies and emphasizes the effectiveness of surgical interventions in severe cases of renal trauma.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Existing guidelines do not offer a quick, efficient alternative to the patient's recollection of relevant clinical features during anamnesis and physical examination for chronic urticaria (CU). This study aimed to identify specific items reflecting the main characteristics of CU that should be included in a comprehensive medical history for patients with CU. We also aimed to clarify possible eliciting factors for CU to support accurate diagnosis of the disease. METHODS: A panel of postgraduate dermatologists conducted a literature search for relevant studies on CU using Medline, the Cochrane database, and PubMed. RESULTS: We identified82 articles from which we drew a collection of items to inform development of an easy-to-use checklist and collection of items that should be included in a correct medical history. The final version of the checklist included42 items across two areas: essential clues for anamnesis and diagnosis of CU; and typical symptoms/parameters or characteristics according to subtype, etiology, and laboratory findings. Items included time of disease onset; duration, shape, size, color, and distribution of wheals; associated angioedema; atopy; and triggering factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our guide provides an easy-to-use tool to support clinicians to focus, orient themselves, and save time in medical consultations for CU, allowing better diagnosis and management of this disease.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Existing clinical guidelines do not offer an efficient alternative for the collection of data on relevant clinical traits during history and physical of the patient with chronic urticaria. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to provide a clinical data checklist together with its guide to allow for thorough information to be obtained and for a physical exam that identifies the main features and triggering factors of the disease to be carried out. METHODS: A search was conducted for relevant literature on chronic urticaria in Medline, the Cochrane library and PubMed. RESULTS: We developed an easy-to-use clinical data checklist with its corresponding clinical guide, comprised by 42 items based on two components: essential clues for history taking and chronic urticaria diagnosis (typical symptoms according to subgroups, etiology and laboratory results). Some components are the time of disease onset, wheals' duration, shape, size, color and distribution, associated angioedema, atopy, triggering factors and others. CONCLUSION: The clinical data checklist and its guide constitute a tool to focus, guide and save time in medical consultation, with the main purpose to aid physicians in providing better diagnosis and management of the disease.
Antecedentes: Las guías clínicas existentes no ofrecen una alternativa eficiente para la recolección de rasgos clínicos relevantes durante la anamnesis y el examen físico del paciente con urticaria crónica. Objetivo: Proporcionar una lista de verificación de información clínica y una guía que permitan obtener información completa y realizar un examen físico que identifique las características principales de la enfermedad y los factores desencadenantes. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda de literatura relevante sobre urticaria crónica en Medline, la Biblioteca Cochrane y PubMed. Resultados: Desarrollamos una lista de verificación de información clínica fácil de usar, con su respectiva guía clínica, integrada por 42 elementos basados en 2 componentes: pistas esenciales para la anamnesis y el diagnóstico de la urticaria crónica (síntomas típicos según sus subtipos, etiología y resultados de laboratorio). Algunos componentes son el tiempo de aparición de la enfermedad, duración, forma, tamaño, color y distribución de las erupciones; angioedema aso-ciado, atopia, factores desencadenantes y otros. Conclusiones: La lista de verificación de información clínica y su guía constituyen una herramien-ta para enfocar, orientar y ahorrar tiempo en la consulta médica, con el fin principal de que los médicos realicen un mejor diagnóstico y manejo de la enfermedad.
