ABSTRACT
AIM: Open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular techniques (ET) are both described in the literature for treating visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs). Aim of this study is to report a two-center experience of patients treated for a VAA using either OSR or ET, analyzing perioperative outcomes. METHODS: Clinical data of 32 VAAs in 32 patients treated between January 2001 and May 2011 were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were men (56.3%). Median age was 64 years (range 26-79). Sixteen aneurysms were symptomatic: half of them were ruptured causing hemoperitoneum or gastrointestinal bleeding. ET were employed in 19 cases (59%) using covered stents (7 patients), coil embolization (5), plug placement (1), thrombin injection (2) and multiple associated techniques (4). OSR consisted in aneurysmectomy with end to end anastomoses (5 patients) or interposition graft (1), aneurysm ligation (4), splenectomy (2). One patient died during open surgery for hemoperitoneum due to VAA rupture (3%). OSR and ET had similar perioperative complication rates (5.2% vs. 15.3%, P=0.76). OSR had a longer in-hospital stay than ET (8 vs. 4 days, P=0.04). The presence of pancreatitis and alcohol abuse were more frequent in patients who presented with VAAs rupture. Clinical presentation with hemoperitoneum or aneurysm rupture were associated with higher mortality, regardless of the type of treatment. CONCLUSION: Both OSR and ET offered a safe way to treat VAAs in our experience.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured/therapy , Aneurysm/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Viscera/blood supply , Adult , Aged , Aneurysm/diagnosis , Aneurysm/mortality , Aneurysm/surgery , Aneurysm, Ruptured/diagnosis , Aneurysm, Ruptured/mortality , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Italy , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stents , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortalitySubject(s)
Arm/blood supply , Cervical Rib/surgery , Ischemia/etiology , Radial Artery/abnormalities , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/complications , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/surgery , Adult , Aneurysm/surgery , Cervical Rib/abnormalities , Female , Hand/blood supply , Hand/pathology , Humans , Radiography , Risk Factors , Saphenous Vein/transplantation , Smoking/adverse effects , Subclavian Artery/surgery , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The popliteal vein is the most frequent site of venous aneurysm. Surgical treatment is indicated above a 2.5 cm diameter to prevent complications, notably deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). Here we report a case of recurrent episodes of severe PE, leading to cardio-circulatory shock caused by a popliteal vein aneurysm (PVA) despite oral anticoagulant therapy. When surgical correction of the aneurysm was performed, we found an ulcerative lesion in the inner aspect of the vein that was acting as a 'thrombogenic focus' inside the aneurysm. An accurate inspection of the intimal wall is always important during surgery of PVA, particularly when tangential resection is performed.
