Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Dent. press implantol ; 8(4): 16-26, Oct.-Dec. 2014. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-762303

ABSTRACT

Introdução: os problemas funcionais, estéticos e psicológicos decorrentes do edentulismo têm levado a uma busca crescente por reabilitação bucal com próteses sobre implantes. Esse tipo de reabilitação necessita de um planejamento meticuloso, especialmente para os casos de maxila edêntula com prótese fixa sobre implantes, em decorrência da anatomia dessa região. Objetivo: o objetivo do presente caso clínico é descrever a reabilitação de uma maxila edêntula com prótese total fixa implantossuportada, cuja infraestrutura recebeu elementos metalocerâmicos cimentados individualmente.


Introduction: Functional, aesthetic and psychological issues arising from edentulism have led to a growing search for oral rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses. This type of rehabilitation requires detailed planning, especially for treating edentulous maxilla with implantsupported fixed prostheses due to the anatomy of this region. Objective: The aim of this case report is to describe the rehabilitation of an edentulous maxilla with implantsupported full fixed prosthesis of which framework received metal-ceramic elements individually cemented.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Jaw, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Clinical Protocols , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Denture, Complete, Upper , Brazil , Cementation , Maxilla , Metal Ceramic Alloys
2.
J Prosthet Dent ; 108(6): 377-85, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23217470

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The influence of different joining techniques on passive fit at the interface structure/abutment of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) superstructures has not yet been clearly established. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare 3 different techniques of joining Co-Cr superstructures by measuring the resulting marginal misfit in a simulated prosthetic assembly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A specially designed metal model was used for casting, sectioning, joining, and measuring marginal misfit. Forty-five cast bar-type superstructures were fabricated in a Co-Cr alloy and randomly assigned by drawing lots to 3 groups (n=15) according to the joining method used: conventional gas-torch brazing (G-TB), laser welding (LW), and tungsten inert gas welding (TIG). Joined specimens were assembled onto abutment analogs in the metal model with the 1-screw method. The resulting marginal misfit was measured with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 3 different points: distal (D), central (C), and mesial (M) along the buccal aspect of both abutments: A (tightened) and B (without screw). The Levene test was used to evaluate variance homogeneity and then the Welsch ANOVA for heteroscedastic data (α=.05). RESULTS: Significant differences were found on abutment A between groups G-TB and LW (P=.013) measured mesially and between groups G-TB and TIG (P=.037) measured centrally. On abutment B, significant differences were found between groups G-TB and LW (P<.001) and groups LW and TIG (P<.001) measured mesially; groups G-TB and TIG (P=.007) measured distally; and groups G-TB and TIG (P=.001) and LW and TIG (P=.007) measured centrally. CONCLUSIONS: The method used for joining Co-Cr prosthetic structures had an influence on the level of resulting passive fit. Structures joined by the tungsten inert gas method produced better mean results than did the brazing or laser method.


Subject(s)
Chromium Alloys/chemistry , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Soldering/methods , Denture, Overlay , Dental Abutments , Dental Casting Technique , Dental Prosthesis Retention , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Humans , Lasers , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Noble Gases , Plasma Gases , Surface Properties , Tungsten
3.
J Oral Implantol ; 37(4): 499-503, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20553152

ABSTRACT

Despite its high success rate, therapy with osseointegrated dental implants is not free of complications. Among the problems that may occur is fracture of implants, which, albeit a rare phenomenon, may lead to unpleasant clinical outcomes for the patient, as well as for the clinician. Thus, it is paramount to know the factors related to the biological processes involved in maintenance of osseointegration and biomechanics applied to dental implants to prevent such complications, as well as treatment options available to deal with the problem. Therefore, the objectives of this work were to investigate the literature to identify causative factors that may lead to fracture of dental implants and to discuss available procedures.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis , Alveolar Bone Loss/complications , Bite Force , Bruxism/complications , Dental Prosthesis Design/adverse effects , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/adverse effects , Device Removal , Humans , Stress, Mechanical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL