Retrospective application of risk scores to ruptured intracranial aneurysms: would they have predicted the risk of bleeding?

As the incidental diagnosis of unruptured intracranial aneurysms has been increasing, several scores were developed to predict risk of rupture and growth to guide the management choice. We retrospectively applied these scores to a multicenter series of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage to test whether they would have predicted the risk of bleeding in the event of aneurysm discovery previous to its rupture. Demographical, clinical, and radiological information of 245 adults were retrieved from two neurovascular centers' database. Data were pooled and PHASES, UCAS, and ELAPSS scores were retrospectively calculated for the whole population and their performances in identifying aneurysms at risk of rupture were compared. Mean PHASES, UCAS, and ELAPSS scores were 5.12 ± 3.08, 5.09 ± 2.62, and 15.88 ± 8.07, respectively. Around half (46%) of patients would have been assigned to the low- or very low-risk class (5-year rupture risk < 1%) in PHASES. Around 28% of patients would have been in a low-risk class, with a probability of 3-year rupture risk < 1% according to UCAS. Finally, ELAPSS score application showed a wider distribution among the risk classes, but a significant proportion of patients (45.5%) lie in the low- or intermediate-risk class for aneurysm growth. A high percentage of patients with ruptured aneurysms in this multicenter cohort would have been assigned to the lower risk categories for aneurysm growth and rupture with all the tested scores if they had been discovered before the rupture. Based on these observations, physicians should be careful about drawing therapeutic conclusions solely based on application of these scores.

Reliability of intraoperative ultrasound in detecting tumor residual after brain diffuse glioma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intraoperative ultrasonography (iUS) is considered an accurate, safe, and cost-effective tool to estimate the extent of resection of both high-grade (HGG) and low-grade (DLGG) diffuse gliomas (DGs). However, it is currently missing an evidence-based assessment of iUS diagnostic accuracy in DGs surgery. The objective of review is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of iUS in detecting tumor residue after DGs resection. A comprehensive literature search for studies published through October 2018 was performed according to PRISMA-DTA and STARD 2015 guidelines, using the following algorithm: ("ultrasound" OR "ultrasonography" OR "ultra-so*" OR "echo*" OR "eco*") AND ("brain" OR "nervous") AND ("tumor" OR "tumour" OR "lesion" OR "mass" OR "glio*" OR "GBM") AND ("surgery" OR "surgical" OR "microsurg*" OR "neurosurg*"). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of iUS in DGs were calculated. A subgroup analysis for HGGs and DLGGs was also conducted. Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review (665 DGs). Ten articles (409 DGs) were selected for the meta-analysis with the following results: sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 93.5%, LR- 0.29, LR+ 3, and DOR 9.67. Heterogeneity among studies was non-significant. Subgroup analysis demonstrates a better diagnostic performance of iUS for DLGGs compared with HGGs. iUS is an effective technique in assessing DGs resection. No significant differences are seen regarding iUS modality and transducer characteristics. Its diagnostic performance is higher in DLGGs than HGGs and could be worsened by previous treatments, surgical artifacts, and small tumor residue volumes.