Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 103(4): 435-43, 2008.
Article in Romanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18780617

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, the standard treatment for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma is open nephroureterectomy, by double lumbar and iliac approach, with peri-meat bladder cuff excision. Since the first laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was performed, several surgical teams were interested by this approach for the treatment of the upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To plead for retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy and to assess the surgical indications. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Were analyzed the results of the recent published series on nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Were included studies on conventional, laparoscopic and retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy, with at least 10 cases, published after 2000. RESULTS: The advantages of retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy are: minimum blood loss, reduced analgesic intake, a shorter hospital stay and a faster return to previous activities, lower rate of intra- or postoperative complications compared with trans-peritoneal laparoscopy or conventional surgery. With a proper case selection the oncologic safety of the retro-peritoneoscopy is equivalent with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: On short term, retro-peritoneoscopic approach shows similar oncological outcome with other techniques. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy is a viable alternative to conventional or trans-peritoneoscopic procedure, with clear cut benefits for the patient. Retro-peritoneoscopy is associated with a low morbidity.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Pelvis , Nephrectomy/methods , Ureteral Neoplasms/surgery , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Retroperitoneal Space , Treatment Outcome , Ureteroscopy/methods , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 103(1): 61-6, 2008.
Article in Romanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18459499

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The manner to extract the specimen after retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy varies to different surgical teams. The aim of the surgeon is to extract the specimen with minimum parietal injuries, according with oncologic principles. The objective of our study was to evaluate the ilio-inguinal approach to extract the specimen after retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Evaluation and follow-up of 71 patients with retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for urothelial cancer (65 pelvic urothelial carcinoma and 6 urothelial carcinoma of the ureter). Ilio-inguinal incision was used for 68 patients to extract the specimen. RESULTS: The operating time was 110 +/- 47 min. Blood lost 101 +/- 57 ml. Retroperitoneoscopic approach 10 +/- 4 min. Ilio-inguinal approach 25 +/- 10 min. The weight of the specimen was 601 +/- 127g. Tumor dimension was 5.9 +/- 1.9 cm. No conversion to open surgery was made. No late post surgery complications were registered ( follow-up at 2 and 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The enlarged nephroureterectomy can be performed using retroperitoneoscopic approach and the specimen can be extracted through an incision at iliac fossa. This approach can be used to extract large specimens preserving the esthetic laparoscopic benefit as well as the oncologic salty and reducing the risk of post-operative eventration.


Subject(s)
Inguinal Canal , Laparoscopy , Nephrectomy/methods , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Ureter/surgery , Urologic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 102(2): 185-90, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17615920

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Tumor location on the posterior aspect of the kidney or close to the renal hilum could increase the difficulty of the retro-peritoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. The aim of our study was to assess how tumor location influences the difficulty of the retro-peritoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed a nonrandomized prospective study in 116 patients with localized renal cell carcinoma who underwent RRN, between Jan. 2000 and Jan. 2005. Twenty-nine patients with a tumor located close to the renal hilum or on the posterior aspect of the kidney (Gr.A) were compared with 87 patients with a tumor at a distance from the renal hilum (Gr.B) in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and difficulty of the dissection. The difficulty of the dissection was subjectively estimated by the main surgeon using a three degree scale (G1-easy, G2-medium, and G3-difficult). All the operations were finalized by retro-peritoneoscopy and G4-very difficult degree--was not recorded. In the Gr. A, the operative time was longer (117.28 min vs. 94.63 min, p < 0.001) and blood loss was higher (291.86 ml vs. 199.54 ml, p < 0.001). The dissection of the renal pedicle was also more difficult in the Gr. A either for artery dissection (G3 27.59% vs. 11.49%, p = 0.0202) or for vein dissection (G3 20.69% vs. 8.05%, p = 0.0321), while peri-fascial dissection was less frequently difficult (G3 10.34% vs. 28.74%, p = 0.0237). Tumor location close to the renal hilum or on the posterior aspect of the kidney increases the difficulty of renal pedicle dissection.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Nephrectomy/methods , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retroperitoneal Space/pathology , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Surgical Procedures
4.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 100(1): 41-6, 2005.
Article in Romanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15810704

ABSTRACT

Radical cystectomy is the standard therapy for invasive bladder cancer, with best oncological results compared to any other therapeutic alternative. Even if laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) is a well established surgical procedure, performing the urinary diversion completely intracorporeal, is still a challenge due to technical difficulties and associated complications. The aim of our study is to present the first series of LRC with ureterosigmoidostomy. Since May 2004 were performed 7 LRC (5 males and 2 females) (Gr. A). All cases were T2N0 clinical stage. These patients were compared with a retrospective group of 50 patients who underwent open procedure (Gr. B) in term of: operative time, blood loss, analgesic requirements, and hospital stay. LRC has a longer operative time but with statistically significant lower blood loss, less analgesia, and shorter hospital stay. The resection margins of the surgical specimens were tumor free at pathologic examination. Long-term follow-up is pending. On short-term, the results of laparoscopic radical cystectomy are encouraging. When significant experience in laparoscopic surgery is lacking, surgeons should exercise caution with completely intracorporeal urinary diversion.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Cystectomy/methods , Laparoscopy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Diversion/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...