Pain, deep neck flexors performance, disability, and head posture in individuals with temporomandibular disorder with and without otological complaints.

BACKGROUND: Otological complaints (OC) are highly prevalent in subjects with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and so is the risk of neck dysfunctions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain, deep neck flexor (DNF) performance, disability, and head and neck posture of individuals with TMD with and without OC. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 57 individuals were divided into a group with TMD and OC (n= 31) and a group with TMD without OC (n= 26). Self-reported pain intensity, masticatory and neck muscles pressure pain thresholds, DNF performance, neck disability, and head and neck posture were evaluated. Data were compared between groups using the independent t test and Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Effect sizes were evaluated using Cohen's index. RESULTS: The TMD with OC group presented less muscle activation [26 (24-28) vs. 24 (24-26) mmHg; p< 0.05], less endurance [105 (46-140) vs. 44 (28-78) points; p< 0.05], and greater neck disability (8.15 ± 5.89 vs. 13.32 ± 6.36 points; p< 0.05). No significant difference was observed in self-reported pain, head and neck posture, or pressure pain thresholds. CONCLUSION: Individuals with TMD with OC presented decreased DNF performance and increased neck disability compared to individuals with TMD without OC.

Evaluation of screw loosening on new abutment screws and after successive tightening.

This study evaluated the loss of the torque applied after use of new screws and after successive tightening. Four infrastructures (IE), using UCLA castable abutment type, were cast in cobalt-chromium alloy and new abutment screws (G1) were used in a first moment. Subsequently, the same abutment screws were used a second time (G2) and more than two times (G3). The values of the torques applied and detorques were measured with a digital torque wrench to obtain the values of initial tightening loss (%). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (?=0.05). Significant differences were observed between the G1 (50.71% ± 11.36) and G2 (24.01% ± 3.33) (p=0.000) and between G1 (50.71% ± 11.36) and G3 (25.60% ± 4.64) (p=0.000). There was no significant difference between G2 and G3 (p=0.774). Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that the percentage of the initial torque loss is lower when screws that already suffered the application of an initial torque were used, remaining stable after application of successive torques.

Evaluation of screw loosening on new abutment screws and after successive tightening

This study evaluated the loss of the torque applied after use of new screws and after successive tightening. Four infrastructures (IE), using UCLA castable abutment type, were cast in cobalt-chromium alloy and new abutment screws (G1) were used in a first moment. Subsequently, the same abutment screws were used a second time (G2) and more than two times (G3). The values of the torques applied and detorques were measured with a digital torque wrench to obtain the values of initial tightening loss ( percent). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (?=0.05). Significant differences were observed between the G1 (50.71 percent ± 11.36) and G2 (24.01 percent ± 3.33) (p=0.000) and between G1 (50.71 percent ± 11.36) and G3 (25.60 percent ± 4.64) (p=0.000). There was no significant difference between G2 and G3 (p=0.774). Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that the percentage of the initial torque loss is lower when screws that already suffered the application of an initial torque were used, remaining stable after application of successive torques.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a perda do torque inicial, quando usados novos parafusos de pilares e após sucessivos apertos. Quatro infra-estruturas (IE), utilizando pilares calcináveis tipo UCLA, foram fundidas em liga de cobalto-cromo, onde novos parafusos de pilares foram utilizados (G1) em um primeiro momento. Posteriormente os mesmos parafusos de pilares foram utilizados em um segundo momento (G2), e depois por mais duas vezes (G3). Os valores de torque e detorque aplicados foram mensurados a partir de um torquímetro digital para obtenção dos valores de perda do torque inicial ( por cento). Os dados foram coletados e submetidos à análise de variância e teste de Tukey (p<0,05). Foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os grupos G1 (50,71 por cento ± 11,36) and G2 (24,01 por cento ± 3,33) (p=0,000) and the groups G1 (50,71 por cento ± 11,36) and G3 (25,60 por cento ± 4,64) (p=0,000). Os maiores valores foram encontrados para o grupo G1. Não houve diferença estaticamente significante entre os grupos G2 e G3 (p=0,774). Dentro das limitações deste estudo, pôde-se observar que a porcentagem de perda de torque inicial foi menor quando os parafusos já haviam sofrido a aplicação do primeiro torque, se mantendo estáveis após os demais torques.