Máscara laríngea ProSealTM como via de administração de surfactante no tratamento da síndrome do desconforto respiratório em recém-nascido pré-termo / ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway for surfactant administration in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in a premature infant

A administração de surfactante pela cânula traqueal e ventilação mecânica é o tratamento convencional da síndrome do desconforto respiratório em prematuros. Alterações hemodinâmicas e respiratórias da intubação traqueal e pré-medicação justificam a busca por alternativas menos invasivas de administração de surfactante. O objetivo do presente estudo foi descrever o uso da máscara laríngea ProSealTM como opção para o tratamento da síndrome do desconforto respiratório em recém-nascido pré-termo com 31 semanas de gestação, 1.335 g, dificuldade respiratória após a primeira hora de vida, e quadro clínico e radiológico de síndrome do desconforto respiratório. O surfactante foi administrado pela máscara laríngea ProSealTM com 3,5 horas de vida, com boa tolerância e sem necessidade de intubação traqueal. Gasometria normal e melhora radiológica, após 3 e 6 horas. O oxigênio foi suspenso após 8 dias; alta sem comorbidades. A máscara laríngea parece ser alternativa indolor e menos invasiva de via de tratamento da síndrome do desconforto respiratório, com possibilidade de redução de intubação traqueal e ventilação mecânica. Por meio de amostra adequada, devem ser confirmadas a eficácia e as vantagens dessa via de tratamento.

The administration of surfactant via tracheal cannula with mechanical ventilation is the conventional treatment for infant respiratory distress syndrome. Hemodynamic and respiratory changes due to tracheal intubation and the need for premedication justify the search for less invasive alternatives of surfactant administration. The objective of this study was to describe the use of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway as an option for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in a premature infant born at 31 weeks of gestation, at 1335 g, with respiratory difficulty after the first hour of life and exhibiting the clinical and radiologic features of respiratory distress syndrome. The surfactant was administered with the use of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway at 3.5 hours of life. It was well tolerated, with no need for tracheal intubation. Normal gasometry and radiologic improvement were observed after three and six hours of administration. Oxygen administration was suspended after eight days, with no comorbidities at discharge. The laryngeal mask airway seems to be a painless and less invasive alternative to treat respiratory distress syndrome and may reduce the need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The efficacy and advantages of this route of treatment should be confirmed in a study of an adequate sample.

ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway for surfactant administration in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in a premature infant. / Máscara laríngea ProSealTM como via de administração de surfactante no tratamento da síndrome do desconforto respiratório em recém-nascido pré-termo.

The administration of surfactant via tracheal cannula with mechanical ventilation is the conventional treatment for infant respiratory distress syndrome. Hemodynamic and respiratory changes due to tracheal intubation and the need for premedication justify the search for less invasive alternatives of surfactant administration. The objective of this study was to describe the use of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway as an option for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in a premature infant born at 31 weeks of gestation, at 1335 g, with respiratory difficulty after the first hour of life and exhibiting the clinical and radiologic features of respiratory distress syndrome. The surfactant was administered with the use of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway at 3.5 hours of life. It was well tolerated, with no need for tracheal intubation. Normal gasometry and radiologic improvement were observed after three and six hours of administration. Oxygen administration was suspended after eight days, with no comorbidities at discharge. The laryngeal mask airway seems to be a painless and less invasive alternative to treat respiratory distress syndrome and may reduce the need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The efficacy and advantages of this route of treatment should be confirmed in a study of an adequate sample.

Early awakening and extubation with remifentanil in ventilated premature neonates.

BACKGROUND: Morphine is one of the most commonly used drugs for sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation, but its pharmacological profile has limitations, such as prolonged duration of action, especially in premature neonates. Because of its very short context-sensitive half-time, remifentanil has rapid onset and quickly decreases in plasma concentration after interrupting administration. The aim of the present study was to compare a continuous infusion of remifentanil and morphine during mechanical ventilation of premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). METHODS: Twenty premature neonates (28-34 weeks) with RDS were randomized in a prospective double-blinded study to receive either a continuous infusion of morphine (n = 10) or remifentanil (n = 10) for mechanical ventilation. The length of time to awaken and extubate the neonate after interrupting opioid administration was recorded. We also recorded stress (COMFORT scale), pain response [Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS)], hemodynamic and ventilatory variables as well as adverse effects secondary to infusion of the specific opioid. RESULTS: After terminating infusion, the length of time required to awaken and extubate the neonates was 18.9- and 12.1-fold longer, respectively, in the morphine group than in the remifentanil group. Both groups produced good quality sedation and analgesia as evaluated by the NIPS and COMFORT scores. No major side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show an interesting potential for the use of remifentanil in premature neonates. Remifentanil allowed an adequate level of sedation and analgesia as well as rapid recovery after discontinuation. However, further properly designed clinical trials are needed before it can be generally recommended.

Morphine versus remifentanil for intubating preterm neonates.

A double-blind, randomised controlled study was conducted to evaluate the intubation conditions in 20 preterm neonates following the use of either morphine or remifentanil as premedication. The findings suggest that the overall intubation conditions were significantly better (p=0.0034) in the remifentanil group than in the morphine group. No severe complications were observed in either group.

Remifentanil for sedation and analgesia in a preterm neonate with respiratory distress syndrome.

We present the efficacy and safety of the use of remifentanil for intubation, sedation and analgesia in a preterm infant during mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome. A 34-week-old baby, born by cesarean delivery that developed respiratory distress, required intubation and ventilatory support. For intubation, the baby was given midazolam (0.2 mg.kg(-1)) and remifentanil (1 microg.kg(-1)). The intubation conditions were assessed and classified as excellent. The remifentanil infusion was started at dose 0.75 microg.kg(-1).min(-1) and the dose adjustments were made depending on the neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS), hemodynamic and respiratory changes or the presence of spontaneous movements. Pulse oximetry, respiratory rate, ECG and invasive blood pressure were continuously monitored. He was given surfactant within 2.5 h of life after which ventilator parameters could be progressively decreased. Three hours later, the remifentanil infusion was decreased to 0.5 microg.kg(-1).min(-1), and he remained sedated (NIPS < 2). Six hour after surfactant administration, blood gases and chest X ray were normal. The remifentanil infusion was then discontinued and 30 min later the baby was awake and extubated with success. There were no side effects after intubation or during the continuous infusion. The profile of remifentanil allowing a rapid recovery, the absence of side effects and a good level of sedation and analgesia support the choice of this opioid for sedation in the NICU.