Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dent Mater ; 35(4): 606-616, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30808560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Clinical issues have been raised about problems related to cytotoxic effects caused when applying self-adhesive cement. It was hypothesized that byproducts eluted from self-adhesive cements modulate oxidative stress response, the gene expression of signaling pathways of inflammatory process/transcriptional activators, and the expression and activity of interstitial collagenases, and modify the phenotypic characteristics of cellular proliferation and mineral deposition in odontoblastic-like cells. METHODS: Cements (MaxCem Elite [MAX] and RelyX U200 [U200)]) were mixed, dispensed into moulds, and photoactivated according to the manufacturers' instructions. Immortalized rat odontoblast-like cells (MDPC-23) were cultured and exposed to polymerized specimens of cements for 4 h. Reactive oxidative specimen production and quantification of gene expression were evaluated. Cell proliferation assay and alizarin red staining were also performed to evaluate the disturbance induced by the cements on cellular proliferation and mineralization. RESULTS: Despite their cytotoxic effects, both self-adhesive cements influenced the metabolism in the odontoblast cells on different scales. MAX induced significantly higher oxidative stress in odontoblast cells than U200. Gene expression varied as a function of exposure to self-adhesive cements; MAX induced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, whereas U200 downregulated, virtually depleted TNF-α expression, also inducing overexpression of the transcriptional factor Runx2. Overexpression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and thioredoxin reductase 1 (TRXR1) occurred after exposure to both cements, antioxidant genes that are downstream of Keap1-Nrf2-ARE system. MAX significantly induced the overexpression of collagenase MMP-1, and U200 induced the expression of gelatinase MMP-2. MAX significantly inhibited cell proliferation whereas U200 significantly activated cell proliferation. Alizarin red staining revealed significantly decreased mineral deposition especially when exposed to MAX. SIGNIFICANCE: These results support the hypothesis that byproducts of different self-adhesive cements play important roles in the highly orchestrated process which ultimately affect the cellular proliferation and the mineral deposition in odontoblastic-like cells, possibly delaying the reparative dentin formation after cementation of indirect restorations, especially on recently exposed dentin preparations.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Resin Cements , Animals , Cell Proliferation , Dental Cements , Dentin , Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1 , Materials Testing , NF-E2-Related Factor 2 , Odontoblasts , Oxidative Stress , Rats
2.
Dent Mater ; 33(12): 1402-1415, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29017759

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cytotoxic effects of exposing odontoblast cells to a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements polymerized using different activation modes. METHODS: Five cements: MaxCem Elite (MAX), Bifix SE (BSE), G-Cem LinkAce (GCE), Clearfil SA Luting (CAS), and RelyX U200 (U200) were mixed, dispensed into molds, and distributed in groups, according to polymerization protocols: immediate photoactivation; delayed photoactivation (10min self-curing plus light-activation); and chemical activation (no light exposure). Immortalized rat odontoblast cells (MDPC-23) were cultured. Cell viability was assessed by Trypan Blue staining and total cell death was assessed by annexin V-APC/7-AAD double staining and flow cytometry. Volatilized compounds from polymerized specimens of cements were evaluated by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Data was analyzed with 2-way ANOVA/Tukey tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: Exposure to all of the cements tested significantly reduced the cell viability, irrespective of the activation protocol (p<0.05). The least harmful cements were CSA and U200. Total death of cells significantly increased when exposed to BSE, GCE, and MAX, especially when chemically activated (p<0.05). Characteristic apoptotic cells increased after exposure to cements, mainly for MAX, regardless of the activation mode. Chemical activation of MAX also induced necrosis. Moreover, GCE and MAX exhibited higher percentages of late apoptotic/dead cells. Chromatograms revealed 28 compounds released from the cements tested, some of them with known carcinogenic effects. Selection of self-adhesive cements and polymerization protocols affect the cytotoxicity and cell viability of odontoblastic cells. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the simplified cementation protocol, care is needed when cementing indirect restorations with self-adhesive cements, especially on recently exposed dentin. This category of material may cause differential cytotoxic effects and should be considered when selecting a cement. This is particularly true in clinical cases of light attenuation, where the polymerization depends on chemical activation, inducing higher cytotoxic damages when using some of the cements tested.


Subject(s)
Dental Cements/toxicity , Odontoblasts/drug effects , Resin Cements/toxicity , Self-Curing of Dental Resins , Animals , Cell Survival/drug effects , Flow Cytometry , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , In Vitro Techniques , Materials Testing , Polymerization , Rats , Volatilization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...