Interprofessional education for shared decision making in drug therapy: a scoping review.

The current complex scenario of medication use calls for the implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) initiatives focused on shared decision making (SDM) in drug therapy. A scoping review was conducted to collate, summarize, and report the evidence available on IPE teaching and learning approaches in this context, involving pre-licensure healthcare students. Searches were conducted in seven electronic databases, with 21 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. This review examines educational strategies employed for interprofessional SDM as well as characteristics of students, teachers, and tutors involved in IPE interventions. The reviewed studies lack detailed description of the students' decision-making process, and none addresses aspects related to patient preferences as a part of learning outcomes. We identified shortcomings in how IPE interventions are assessed and reported. Only a few of the studies explicitly describe the use of competency-based frameworks proposed by national and international organizations, and less than 60% describe learning outcomes. The absence of experiences focused on interprofessional SDM in drug therapy suggests a gap that needs to be addressed with future studies evaluated in a robust way. We argue that such experiences enable students, as a team, to learn to share decisions with the patient as an effective team member.

Quality management tools applied to drug dispensing in hospital pharmacy: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The process of drug dispensing in hospital pharmacies (HPs) is one of the essential steps in health care, but presents high complexity due to the diversity of professionals and clinical conditions of patients. Therefore, the use of quality management tools may be an important strategy to improve patient safety and to achieve institutional goals, including user satisfaction and reduction of costs. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review sought to describe quality management tools applied to drug dispensing in HPs; quality indicators used and results obtained. METHODS: This scoping review was developed according to the Cochrane methodology and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA), being registered at Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KP3AJ). The searches were performed in electronic databases Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL and Lilacs, with no limit of date or language. Studies on quality management tools applied to drug dispensing in HPs were assessed for eligibility, extracted and compiled in a narrative form. RESULTS: From the 1318 studies identified, 11 were eligible for this review. The quality management tools more frequently reported were those related to the definition of root cause (n = 4; 36%), e.g. DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control) and the cause and effect diagram; tools for risk management, such as FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) and its variations (n = 4; 36%); and tools related to the LSS (LEAN Six Sigma) principles (n = 3; 27%). The quality indicators used to monitor the results were, mainly, work team satisfaction, time spent performing activities and reduction of errors and costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of quality management tools showed a tendency to improve the indicators of the drug dispensing process in HPs, such as increase in work team satisfaction, reduction of time spent performing activities, errors and costs, improving the quality of services.