Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: a comparison of open and minimally-invasive surgical approaches.

To compare perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing minimally-invasive (MIS) and open surgical approaches for the treatment of Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis (XGP). Between 2007 and 2017 we retrospectively identified 40 patients undergoing nephrectomy at our institution for pathologically confirmed XGP. Patients whose operations were ultimately completed with open technique were analyzed with the open cohort, whereas patients whose operations were completed in entirety using any laparoscopic approach were analyzed with the MIS group. Twenty-three patients were analyzed in the open cohort, compared to seventeen in the MIS group. Three patients in the open cohort were converted intraoperatively from MIS to open approach. Compared to the open group, the MIS group less often had an abscess on preoperative CT (11.8% vs 54.5%; p = 0.006). The MIS group also had lower intraoperative blood loss (100 vs 400 mL; p < 0.001), lower rate of blood transfusion (0% vs 45.5%; p = 0.002), lower postoperative intensive care admission (0% vs 34.8%; p = 0.013), and shorter hospital stay (4 vs 7 days; p = 0.013). However, there was no significant difference in high-grade complications between these groups (5.9% vs 34.8%; p = 0.054). Preoperative CT scan may be an important factor when considering operative approach for treatment of XGP. Patients who are able to undergo MIS approach have less blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and are less likely to require intensive care admission, which may be related to the disease process, the surgical technique, or both.

Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Squamous Variant Histology in Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Does Presence and Percentage Matter?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on squamous variant (SV) bladder cancer by investigating patients presenting with SV histology at the time of transurethral resection (TUR), stratified by their receipt of NACT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 71 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and SV in the TUR specimen who underwent cystectomy between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Our primary outcome was pathologic response at time of cystectomy. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival and overall survival stratified by receipt of NACT. A subgroup analysis was then conducted on the patients with defined SV% on TUR stratified by % involvement (< 50% SV vs. ≥ 50% SV). RESULTS: The median age of the NACT and no-NACT groups was 60.2 and 70 years, respectively (P = .003). The complete response rate at cystectomy was 60% versus 13.7% for the NACT and no-NACT groups, respectively (P < .001). The non-organ-confined disease rate at time of radical cystectomy was 35% for the NACT group and 68.6% for the no-NACT group (P = .01). The NACT group had fewer recurrences than the no-NACT group (10% vs 47.1%; P = .003). In the subgroup analysis, the lower rate of non-organ-confined disease persisted for the patients who underwent NACT at the lower SV percentage but failed to remain significant at greater percentage involvement. This was also true for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of NACT in variant histology bladder cancer is variable. In patients with SV, these results favor the recommendation in favor of NACT administration, particularly when the primary tumor has < 50% involvement by the variant histology.

Lymph node yield as a predictor of overall survival following inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a specific lymph node yield (LNY) affects overall survival (OS) in patients with penile cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 364 men diagnosed with pSCC who underwent ILND between 2004 and 2013. Men diagnosed on autopsy or at the time of death, patients with preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy, M+ and N3 disease, or with less than 3-month of follow-up were excluded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare Overall Survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression model was developed to assess predictors of OS. RESULTS: The median number of LN retrieved was 16 (IQR: 9-23). There was no significant difference in race, stage, grade for men with LNY ≤15 vs. >15. However, men with LNY ≤15 were significantly older than those with LNY >15 (65 vs. 59 years, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, radical surgery, age, N+ disease, and LNY ≤15 were independent predictors of worse OS. Patients with LNY ≤15 showed significantly worse 5-year OS versus those with LNY >15 (49% vs. 67%, p=0.008). Nodal density (ND) ≥12.5% was also associated with decreased 5-year OS versus ND <12.5% (31% vs. 70%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: LNY following ILND for pSCC appears to be an independent predictor of OS. A total LNY of >15 following ILND may have a beneficial impact on OS and serve as the threshold for defining an adequate ILND.

Reclassification Rates of Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance After the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy: An Analysis of 7 Widely Used Eligibility Criteria.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of adding magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion biopsy cores to standard 12-core biopsy in selecting men for active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among men undergoing a fusion biopsy for evaluation of prostate cancer, we selected men who were eligible for at least 1 of 7 different AS criteria based on the standard biopsy alone. We assessed each patient's eligibility for each AS criterion with and without the inclusion of fusion biopsy cores. The primary end point was the proportion of men who were initially eligible for AS but became ineligible after addition of the fusion biopsy cores. RESULTS: A total of 100 men were eligible for at least 1 AS criterion. After addition of fusion biopsy cores, the proportion of men who became ineligible for AS varied from 10.3% to 40.7%. Criteria that incorporated an absolute maximum number of cores positive had the highest rates of ineligibility. Using a percentage of cores positive helped to reduce the number of patients who would have been excluded. Combining the targeted biopsy cores into one, or taking the single core with the highest grade or volume did not appear to reduce the proportion of men who became ineligible. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of fusion biopsy to standard 12-core biopsy significantly increased the number of men who became ineligible for AS. Using the percent of cores positive, instead of an absolute number, allowed fewer exclusions. AS criteria may need to be updated to prevent the unnecessary exclusion of men due to an oversampling of low-risk disease.

Re-examining Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Density: Defining the Optimal PSA Range and Patients for Using PSA Density to Predict Prostate Cancer Using Extended Template Biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density vs PSA across different PSA ranges and by prior biopsy status in a prospective cohort undergoing prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men from a prospective trial underwent an extended template biopsy to evaluate for prostate cancer at 26 sites throughout the United States. The area under the receiver operating curve assessed the predictive accuracy of PSA density vs PSA across 3 PSA ranges (<4 ng/mL, 4-10 ng/mL, >10 ng/mL). We also investigated the effect of varying the PSA density cutoffs on the detection of cancer and assessed the performance of PSA density vs PSA in men with or without a prior negative biopsy. RESULTS: Among 1290 patients, 585 (45%) and 284 (22%) men had prostate cancer and significant prostate cancer, respectively. PSA density performed better than PSA in detecting any prostate cancer within a PSA of 4-10 ng/mL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.70 vs 0.53, P < .0001) and within a PSA >10 mg/mL (AUC: 0.84 vs 0.65, P < .0001). PSA density was significantly more predictive than PSA in detecting any prostate cancer in men without (AUC: 0.73 vs 0.67, P < .0001) and with (AUC: 0.69 vs 0.55, P < .0001) a previous biopsy; however, the incremental difference in AUC was higher among men with a previous negative biopsy. Similar inferences were seen for significant cancer across all analyses. CONCLUSION: As PSA increases, PSA density becomes a better marker for predicting prostate cancer compared with PSA alone. Additionally, PSA density performed better than PSA in men with a prior negative biopsy.