Efficacy and tolerability of a new chlorhexidine-based vaginal gel in vaginal infections.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a new chlorhexidine-based bioadhesive vaginal gel (Clomirex) in women with vaginal infections. STUDY DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A total of 90 nonpregnant women with vaginal infections of both bacterial (bacterial vaginosis: BV) or fungal (vaginal candidiasis VC) origin, were enrolled in the study: a randomised, controlled, 4-week, multicentre trial. Patients were randomly treated with either chlorhexidine 0.5% vaginal gel (CHX-VG), 2.5 g or with metronidazole vaginal tablets 500 mg (M) or clotrimazole (CL) vaginal cream, depending on aetiology of the infection, daily for 7 days (treatment phase) in a 2:1 ratio. A total of 45 women had a diagnosis of BV and 45 a diagnosis of VC. Sixty women were treated with CHX-VG, 15 with M and 15 with CL. All patients were followed for an additional 3 weeks without treatments (follow-up phase). For women with BV,clinical cure rate was defined as the disappearance of the following signs and symptoms: homogenous vaginal discharge; presence of >or= 2 or more clue cells at the wet mount microscopy; a vaginal pH > 4.7 and a positive whiff test. For women with VC, clinical cure rate was defined as a resolution of signs and symptoms plus absence of hyphae, pseudohyphae and blastospores on 10% KOH wet mount microscopy. Clinical cure rate was assessed at the end of the study (week 4) by an investigator unaware of the patient's treatment allocation. RESULTS: At week 4, in women with BV, 28 out of 30 (93%) women in the CHX-VG group were clinically cured in comparison with 11 out of 15 (74%) in the M group (p = 0.3). In women with VC, 26 out of 30 (86.6%) women in the CHX-VG group were clinically cured in comparison with 13 out of 15 (86%) in the CL group (p = 0.5). Tolerability was good and very good in 90% of the CHX-VG patients. Six women (10%) complained of a mild transient burning sensation after CHX-VG vaginal application. No serious adverse events were observed during the trial in all treated groups. No women presented with vaginal discharge after treatment.

Efficacy of the combination of 2 g oral tinidazole and acidic buffering vaginal gel in comparison with vaginal clindamycin alone in bacterial vaginosis: a randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of tinidazole (T) (Trimonase, Mipharm, Italy) and an acidic vaginal gel (Miphil) (M) in comparison with vaginal clindamycin (CL) (Cleocin Pharmacia Upjohn) in BV. DESIGN: A multicentre, randomised, investigator-blinded, controlled trial. POPULATION AND METHODS: 64 women with BV were enrolled. Thirty-two were allocated to receive oral T 2g, single dose, and 32 were assigned to CL 2% for 7 consecutive days. After week 1, T group were treated with an acidic vaginal gel, 2g every 3 days, for additional 3 weeks, whereas CL group did not received any additional treatment. Patients were evaluated at week 1 and 4. Vaginal pH, the BV-blue test (Gryphus Diagnostics, USA) and the whiff test were performed at baseline and at week 4. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Clinical cure rate; normalisation of vaginal pH (pH<4.5); and laboratory cure rate (defined as a clinical cure rate and a negative results of BV-blue and whiff test). RESULTS: At baseline, vaginal pH values were (mean+/-S.D.) 5.4+/-0.7 and 5.3+/-0.5 in T and CL groups, respectively. Six patients (2 in T group and 4 in CL group) withdrew from the study due to side effects. At week 1, the clinical cure rates were 84% in both T and CL treated group (P=N.S.). At week 4, clinical cure rates were 94% in T+M group and 77% in CL group (P=N.S.). The laboratory cure rates were 81% in T+M group and 59% in CL group (P<0.04). Vaginal pH normalisation (i.e. pH <4.5) was achieved in 78% and in 38% of T+M and CL groups, respectively (P<0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, 2g single oral dose tinidazole was at least as effective as 7-day of vaginal clindamycin. The sequential treatment of tinidazole and acidic vaginal gel was superior to vaginal clindamycin in lowering vaginal pH and achieving a higher laboratory tests normalization rate at 1-month follow-up.