Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 54(1): 36, 2022 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34988774

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to examine the effects of selenium (Se) and vitamin E (vitE) supplementation on blood cell counts and blood metabolite concentrations in goats and their kids. Fifteen Saanen goats (average age 6 years of age; average initial body weight of 70 ± 10 kg) and 21 ½ Saanen × ½ Pardo Alpine crossbred goat kids (average body weight of 3.70 ± 0.64 kg) were used. Animals were distributed in a completely randomized design with five replicates per diet for mother goats and seven for goat kids and randomly assigned into three groups in the following diets: CON, control basal diet; Se, inclusion of 3.2 mg of Se/kg DM; SevitE, inclusion of 3.2 mg Se/kg DM and 1145 IU/day vitE/kg DM. Effects of time were observed on red blood cells, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin in goats and goat kids. Effects of time were observed on differential counts of leucocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes in goat kids. Interaction was observed for high-density lipoprotein and total protein in goats and for triglycerides, beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) in goat kids. Effects of time were observed on low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, glucose, lactate, BHBA, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), creatinine, aspartate-aminotransferase, and GGT in goats and all blood metabolites in goat kids. Selenium, vitE, or association in the evaluated levels are not sufficient to change blood cell counts when supplied in diets for goats or goat kids. However, the effect of time or interaction between time and diets change the blood metabolite concentrations in the animals.


Subject(s)
Goats , Selenium , Animals , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Supplements , Peripartum Period , Selenium/pharmacology , Vitamin E
2.
J. Health Sci. Inst ; 29(2): 139-142, apr.-jun. 2011. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-606313

ABSTRACT

Objetivo - Comparar a substituição parcial de farelo de soja por uréia sobre a produtividade e qualidade do leite. Métodos - Foram utilizadas 24 vacas Girolanda em lactação em um experimento com delineamento inteiramente casualizado. Dois concentrados foram utilizados: (C) controle, sendo a principal fonte de proteína o farelo de soja e (U) uréia, neste tratamento 1/3 da proteína total foi substituída por nitrogênio não protéico (NNP) oriundo da uréia. Foram avaliadas a produção, a composição e as características físico-químicas do leite. As dietas foram formuladas seguindo as recomendações do NRC (2001) e a nutrição protéica foi acompanhada pela concentração de uréia plasmática. A contagem de células somáticas foi utilizada com a finalidade de monitorar a sanidade da glândula mamária. Resultados - A produção leiteira foi diferente (P<0,05) entre os tratamentos 9,41 para o grupo Uréia vs. 7,98 kg/vaca/dia para o grupo Controle. A composição e as características físico-químicas foram semelhantes entre os tratamentos (P>0,05). Houve redução de 11,5% no custo do concentrado com inclusão de uréia. Conclusão - A substituição parcial do farelo de soja por uréia em dietas para vacas Girolanda mostrou-se uma alternativa viável para a produção leiteira, pois além de aumentar a produção, reduziu os custos com alimentação, sem alterar o valor nutricional do leite.


Objective - To compare the partially replacement of soybean meal by urea on lactation performance in experiment completely randomized. Methods - Twenty four Girolanda dairy cows were used. Two treatments were used: (C) control, being the main source of protein soybean meal and (U) urea, in this treatment 1/3 of total protein was replaced by non-protein nitrogen (NPN) derived from the urea. Milk production, composition and physico-chemical characteristic were measured. Diets were formulated following the recommendations of NRC (2001) and protein diet was accompanied by the concentration of blood urea nitrogen. Somatic cell count was used to monitor udder health. Results - There were differences (P>0.05) among treatments only for milk production 9.41 for urea treatment vs. 7.98 kg/cow/day for control treatment. Milk composition and physico-quimical characteristics were similar among treatments (P>0.05). There was a decrease of 11,5% in the cost of the concentrate with addition of urea. Conclusion - This study indicated that using urea for lactating Girolanda dairy cows had no detrimental effect on lactation performance or on milk nutritional value.


Subject(s)
Animals , Breast-Milk Substitutes , Nitrogen/administration & dosage , Urea/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...