Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(Suppl): S170-S178, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622833

ABSTRACT

To respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and recover from its aftermath, primary care teams will face waves of overwhelming demand for information and the need to significantly transform care delivery. INNOVATION: Oregon Health & Science University's primary care team envisioned and implemented the COVID-19 Connected Care Center, a statewide telephone "hotline" service. RESULTS: The hotline has taken more than 5825 calls from patients in 33 of Oregon's 36 counties in less than 3 months. In preliminary survey data, 86% of patients said their questions were answered during the call, 90% would recommend this service, and 70% reported a reduction in stress levels about coronavirus. In qualitative interviews, patients reported their questions answered, short wait times, nurses spent time as needed, and appropriate follow-up was arranged. CONCLUSION: Academic health centers may have the capacity to leverage their extensive resources to rapidly launch a multiphased pandemic response that meets peoples' need for information and access to primary care, while minimizing risk of infection and emergency department use and rapidly supporting primary care teams to make the necessary operational changes to do the same in their communities. Such efforts require external funding in a fee-for-service payment model.


Subject(s)
Hotlines/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Fee-for-Service Plans , Hotlines/organization & administration , Humans , Oregon/epidemiology , Pandemics , Primary Health Care/economics , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/economics , Triage/methods
2.
J Med Pract Manage ; 31(2): 74-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26665471

ABSTRACT

Several models of scheduling have been documented in the literature, including the traditional model, the carve-out model, and the advanced access model. We describe the implementation of the advanced access model in our clinic, which has been very successful. Advanced access has decreased third next available appointments to less than seven days for many of our providers and has increased individual primary care physician continuity for 40% of our providers. Interestingly, we had no gains in patient satisfaction, which is consistent with other previously published studies on advanced access.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , Family Practice/education , Health Services Accessibility , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Practice Management, Medical/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Humans , Models, Organizational , Oregon , United States
3.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 33(10): 617-24, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18030864

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care organizations have begun to move toward a nonpunitive, or "blame-free," process when analyzing medical errors and near misses. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute's (Boston) "Principles of a Fair and Just Culture," define for staff and managers behavioral expectations when an error occurs. CREATING THE PRINCIPLES OF A FAIR AND JUST CULTURE: The principles focus not just on patient safety but on a culture of safety and transparency in all the organization's functional areas, including nonclinical departments such as information services, administration, and research. INCORPORATING THE PRINCIPLES INTO PRACTICE: Introducing the principles is a gradual process, one that requires continual education and discussion among staff at all levels and a commitment to examining and changing many of the systems, policies, and procedures that guide the organization's work. A survey conducted in January 2007 revealed that the clinical areas had sustained higher-than-average scores and that the nonclinical areas showed improvement. DISCUSSION: Changing a long-standing culture of blame, control, and disrespect to one that embraces principles of fairness and justice and standards of respectful behavior is a major undertaking. Educating and involving clinical and administrative leaders, who work directly with staff and play a pivotal role in translating the principles into practice, is especially important.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Organizational Culture , Safety Management/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Inservice Training , Massachusetts , Organizational Case Studies , Organizational Innovation , Social Justice , Staff Development
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...