The impact of nodal tumour burden on lymphoscintigraphic imaging in patients with melanomas.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively study the influence of nodal tumour burden on lymphoscintigraphic imaging in 509 consecutive patients with melanomas. METHODS: Bidirectional lymphatic drainage, the clear depiction of an afferent lymphatic vessel, time to depiction of the first sentinel lymph node (SLN) and number of depicted and excised nodes were recorded. Nodal tumour load was classified as SLN-negative, SLN micrometastases or macrometastases. RESULTS: In the overall population, using multivariate regression analysis, a short SLN depiction time was significantly associated with the depiction of a greater number of radioactive nodes, a short distance between the primary tumour site and the nodal basin, younger age and lower nodal tumour burden. The proportion of patients with clear depiction of an afferent lymphatic vessel depended on the nodal tumour load (46% in SLN-negative patients, 57% in SLN positive patients, and 69% in patients with macrometastases; P = 0.009). Macrometastasis was significantly associated with delayed depiction of the first radioactive node and a greater number of depicted hotspots. In patients with clinically nonsuspicious nodes, i.e. the classical target group for SLN biopsy, clear depiction of an afferent vessel was significantly associated with a higher number of SLNs during dynamic acquisition, SLN micrometastasis and a higher overall number of metastatic lymph nodes after SLN biopsy plus completion lymphadenectomy. The excision of more than two SLNs did not increase the metastasis detection rate. In patients with bidirectional or tridirectional lymphatic drainage, the SLN positivity rates for the first, second and third basin were 25.4%, 11.7% and 0.0 %, respectively (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In patients with clinically nonsuspicious lymph nodes, clear depiction of an afferent lymph vessel may be a sign of micrometastasis. Macrometastasis is associated with prominent afferent vessels, delayed depiction of the first radioactive node and a higher number of depicted hotspots.

The popliteal fossa - a problem zone for sentinel lymphonodectomy.

BACKGROUND: The impact of lymphatic drainage to popliteal sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has yet to be explored in detail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed lymphoscintigraphy on 663 patients with cutaneous melanomas. The following day sentinel lymphonodectomy was performed. SLNs were studied on serial sections with both histology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: 166 patients had a melanoma located on the foot, the lower leg or the knee, i. e., the potential of lymphatic drainage to the popliteal lymph nodes. On lymphoscintigraphy, only 16 patients (9.6 %) showed popliteal SLNs. A popliteal SLN was surgically identified in only 6 of the 16 patients. The reason for the poor identification rate was exhausted radioactivity in the small popliteal nodes the day after lymphoscintigraphy. In 3 cases, popliteal SLN metastasis was diagnosed. All but one patient had an additional drainage to the inguinal lymph nodes; inguinal SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 7 patients. Even all 16 patients showed lymphatic drainage to iliac lymph nodes, metastasis in the pelvis was diagnosed in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Popliteal SLNs are observed in less than 10 % of the patients with melanomas of the distal leg. In the case of suspected popliteal drainage, lymphoscintigraphy should be performed on the day of sentinel lymphonodectomy because the radioactivity of the small and deeply situated popliteal nodes diminishes rapidly. With respect to complete lymphadenectomy, decision-making is difficult since three nodal basins (popliteal, inguinal and iliac) may harbor metastases.