Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Efforts to decrease radiation exposure during pediatric high-resolution thoracic computed tomography (HRCT), while maintaining diagnostic image quality, are imperative. The objective of this investigation was to compare organ doses and scan performance for pediatric HRCT using volume, helical, and noncontiguous axial acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thoracic organ doses were measured using 20 metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters. Mean and median organ doses and scan durations were determined and compared for three acquisition modes in a 5-year-old anthropomorphic phantom using similar clinical pediatric scan parameters. Image noise was measured and compared in identical regions within the thorax. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower dose in lung (1.8 vs 2.7 mGy, P < .02) and thymus (2.3 vs 2.7 mGy, P < .02) between volume and noncontiguous axial modes and in lung (1.8 vs 2.3 mGy, P < .02), breast (1.8 vs 2.6 mGy, P < .02), and thymus (2.3 vs 2.4 mGy, P < .02) between volume and helical modes. There was a significantly lower median image noise for volume compared to helical and axial modes in lung (55.6 vs 79.3 and 70.7) and soft tissue (76.0 vs 111.3 and 89.9). Scan times for volume, helical, and noncontiguous axial acquisitions were 0.35, 3.9, and 24.5 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSION: Volumetric HRCT provides an opportunity for thoracic organ dose and image noise reduction, at significantly faster scanning speeds, which may benefit pediatric patients undergoing surveillance studies for diffuse lung disease.

Comparison of radiation dose estimates, image noise, and scan duration in pediatric body imaging for volumetric and helical modes on 320-detector CT and helical mode on 64-detector CT.

BACKGROUND: Advanced multidetector CT systems facilitate volumetric image acquisition, which offers theoretic dose savings over helical acquisition with shorter scan times. OBJECTIVE: Compare effective dose (ED), scan duration and image noise using 320- and 64-detector CT scanners in various acquisition modes for clinical chest, abdomen and pelvis protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ED and scan durations were determined for 64-detector helical, 160-detector helical and volume modes under chest, abdomen and pelvis protocols on 320-detector CT with adaptive collimation and 64-detector helical mode on 64-detector CT without adaptive collimation in a phantom representing a 5-year-old child. Noise was measured as standard deviation of Hounsfield units. RESULTS: Compared to 64-detector helical CT, all acquisition modes on 320-detector CT resulted in lower ED and scan durations. Dose savings were greater for chest (27-46%) than abdomen/pelvis (18-28%) and chest/abdomen/pelvis imaging (8-14%). Noise was similar across scanning modes, although some protocols on 320-detector CT produced slightly higher noise. CONCLUSION: Dose savings can be achieved for chest, abdomen/pelvis and chest/abdomen/pelvis examinations on 320-detector CT compared to helical acquisition on 64-detector CT, with shorter scan durations. Although noise differences between some modes reached statistical significance, this is of doubtful diagnostic significance and will be studied further in a clinical setting.

Radiation dose estimation for prospective and retrospective ECG-gated cardiac CT angiography in infants and small children using a 320-MDCT volume scanner.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine patient dose estimates for clinical pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography (CTA) protocols on a 320-MDCT volume scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Organ doses were measured using 20 metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters. Radiation dose was estimated for volumetrically acquired clinical pediatric prospectively and retrospectively ECG-gated cardiac CTA protocols in 5-year-old and 1-year-old anthropomorphic phantoms on a 320-MDCT scanner. Simulated heart rates of 60 beats/min (5-year-old phantom) and 120 beats/min (1- and 5-year-old phantoms) were used. Effective doses (EDs) were calculated using average measured organ doses and International Commission on Radiological Protection 103 tissue-weighting factors. Dose-length product (DLP) was recorded for each examination and was used to develop dose conversion factors for pediatric cardiac examinations acquired with volume scan mode. DLP was also used to estimate ED according to recently published dose conversion factors for pediatric helical chest examinations. Repeated measures and paired Student t test analyses were performed. RESULTS: For the 5-year-old phantom, at 60 beats/min, EDs ranged from 1.2 mSv for a prospectively gated examination to 4.5 mSv for a retrospectively gated examination. For the 5-year-old phantom, at 120 beats/min, EDs ranged from 3.0 mSv for a prospectively gated examination to 4.9 mSv for a retrospectively gated examination. For the 1-year-old phantom, at 120 beats/min, EDs ranged from 2.7 mSv for a prospectively gated examination to 4.5 mSv for a retrospectively gated examination. CONCLUSION: EDs for 320-MDCT volumetrically acquired ECG-gated pediatric cardiac CTA are lower than those published for conventional 16- and 64-MDCT scanners.