Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol ; 283(4): H1609-15, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12234815

ABSTRACT

Aortic valve stenosis impairs subendocardial perfusion with a risk of irreversible subendocardial tissue damage. A likely precursor of damage is subendocardial contractile dysfunction, expressed by the parameter TransDif, which is defined as epicardial minus endocardial myofiber shortening, normalized to the mean value. With the use of magnetic resonance tagging in two short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV), TransDif was derived from LV torsion and contraction during ejection. TransDif was determined in healthy volunteers (control, n = 9) and in patients with aortic valve stenosis before (AVSten, n = 9) and 3 mo after valve replacement (AVRepl, n = 7). In the control group, TransDif was 0.00 +/- 0.14 (mean +/- SD). In the AVSten group, TransDif increased to 0.96 +/- 0.62, suggesting impairment of subendocardial myofiber shortening. In the AVRepl group, TransDif decreased to 0.37 +/- 0.20 but was still elevated. In eight of nine AVSten patients, the TransDif value was elevated individually (P < 0.001), suggesting that the noninvasively determined parameter TransDif may provide important information in planning of treatment of aortic valve stenosis.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/pathology , Myocardium/pathology , Aged , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Cardiovascular , Torsion Abnormality , Ventricular Function, Left
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 23(7): 1181-3, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10914379

ABSTRACT

An atrial defibrillator was implanted in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, associated cardiac abnormalities, and persistent atrial arrhythmias. During a 15-month follow-up, 14 of 20 spontaneous episodes of his arrhythmias were successfully treated with the device. Two of these episodes were converted to sinus rhythm during ambulatory use of the device. Successful use of the device required implantation of a third defibrillation lead in the persistent left-sided superior caval vein and rigid control of congestive heart failure. An atrial defibrillator may be a valid treatment option in patients with congenital heart disease crippled by atrial fibrillation.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Adult , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Equipment Design , Humans , Male , Transposition of Great Vessels/complications
3.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 4 Suppl 1: 197-9, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10590508

ABSTRACT

The Metrixtrade mark Atrioverter Expanded Indication Trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of an implantable atrial defibrillator in patients with symptomatic, recurrent and drug refractory atrial fibrillation who also have structural heart disease. In this ongoing multicenter study, all patients are anticoagulated and concomitant antiarrhythmic drug treatment is left to the preference of the physician. Holter monitoring is performed prior to enrollment in the study. Spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) are treated under physician observation and when patients are ambulatory, the device is programmed in a monitoring mode. The atrial defibrillation threshold is measured at implantation and at 3, 6 and 12 months thereafter. The performance of the AF detection and R-wave synchronization algorithm is assessed at implantation, at regular follow-up intervals, and each time the patient visits the hospital for treatment of a spontaneous episode of AF. An echocardiogram is performed prior to implantation, at 3 and 6 month follow-up and for patients with an implanted heart valve, after 20 and 50 atrial defibrillation shocks have been delivered. The study started on October 1997 and will end after the last patient enrolled completes his/her six-month post-implantation follow-up, unless a safety issue arises. As of September 1998, 6 patients (2 patients with tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy, 1 patient with a mitral valve prosthesis, 2 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 1 patient with congenital heart disease) have been enrolled in the study. Over 350 shocks have been delivered for atrial defibrillation testing or termination of spontaneous AF episodes. There have been no reported cases of ventricular proarrhythmia or inaccurately synchronized shocks and no complications of device therapy in this population.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Atria , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recurrence , Research Design , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...