Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Med Qual ; 29(5): 397-402, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24061867

ABSTRACT

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common, lethal, and expensive. Little is known about optimal strategies to evaluate process measures for VAP prevention. The authors conducted a prospective study of different sampling strategies for evaluating head of bed (HOB) elevation and oral care. There was no significant difference between morning and evening shift HOB elevation compliance rates (P = .47). If oral care was performed at least once during a 12-hour shift, there was an 87% probability that it also was performed at least twice. If oral care was performed at least twice during a 12-hour shift, then there was a 93% probability that chlorhexidine oral care was performed at least once. The results of this study suggest that sampling HOB elevation twice as compared with once daily is unlikely to change the estimate of performance, oral care need not be frequently sampled, and high oral care compliance may predict chlorhexidine oral care compliance.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Disinfectants/therapeutic use , Humans , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...