Outcomes During Intended Fluoroscopy-free Ablation in Adults and Children.

Electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems facilitate the elimination of fluoroscopy during electrophysiologic (EP) studies and ablations. The rate and predictors of fluoroscopy requirements while attempting fluoroscopy-free (FF) ablations are unclear. This study aimed (1) to investigate the rates of fluoroscopic use and acute success in patients initially referred for FF ablation and (2) to identify procedural characteristics associated with fluoroscopic use in patients in whom FF ablation was initially planned (IFF). We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent IFF EP study or ablation between 2010 and 2013. Patient and procedural characteristics were compared between those with successful FF procedures and those who subsequently required fluoroscopy during their procedure. An FF EP study with or without ablation was performed in 124 patients during 138 procedures for either supraventricular or idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. Of the 138 procedures, 105 of them were performed without fluoroscopy. In the remaining 33 cases, fluoroscopy was used for an average of 1.21 minutes ± 1.18 minutes. Acute procedural success was achieved in 97% of both FF and fluoroscopy procedures. The primary reason for fluoroscopy use was as a guide for transseptal puncture. There were no significant differences between FF and fluoroscopy procedures with respect to catheter placement time or complication rate. In conclusion, in this single-center study of IFF procedures, despite careful case selection for IFF ablation, 24% of IFF cases ultimately required minimal fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy and FF procedures had similar rates of procedural success and complications. Additional large prospective studies are required to further investigate the safety and efficacy of FF ablations.

Effects of diltiazem and esmolol on cycle length and spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blocking agents have been shown to prolong the duration of atrial fibrillation. This study compared the effects of intravenous diltiazem and esmolol on the cycle length and conversion rate of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 41 adults without structural heart disease, atrial fibrillation was induced by rapid atrial pacing. After 3 minutes, either diltiazem (n = 13), esmolol (n = 15), or saline (n = 13) was infused. In the diltiazem group, the atrial fibrillation cycle length shortened by a mean of 43 milliseconds and became significantly shorter than in the control group, while the atrial fibrillation cycle length in the esmolol group did not change. Spontaneous termination of atrial fibrillation occurred significantly less often in the diltiazem group (23%) than in the esmolol (67%, P < 0.05) or placebo groups (77%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous diltiazem shortens the atrial fibrillation cycle length and lowers the probability of spontaneous conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. These results suggest that the use of diltiazem for acute rate control may unwittingly prolong the duration of recent-onset atrial fibrillation.

Effects of verapamil and ibutilide on atrial fibrillation and postfibrillation atrial refractoriness.

INTRODUCTION: Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardioversion may be related to shortening of the atrial effective refractory period (ERP). This study compared the effects of verapamil and ibutilide on AF cycle length (AFCL), atrial ERP, and susceptibility to recurrent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 33 adults, the atrial ERP was measured at basic drive CLs of 350 and 500 msec before and after a brief episode of pacing-induced AF. During AF, verapamil, ibutilide, or saline was infused in 11 patients each. Shortening of the post-AF atrial ERP was attenuated by verapamil and prevented by ibutilide. AFCL shortened by 32+/-21 msec in the verapamil group (P < 0.01), prolonged by 44+/-14 msec in the ibutilide group (P < 0.001), and did not change in the control group. AF converted to sinus rhythm within 10 minutes less often after verapamil (0%) than after ibutilide (82%) or than in the control group (73%). Post-AF, AF lasting > 10 minutes was induced more often in the verapamil group than in the ibutilide group (26% vs 0%; P = 0.01). Another 10 patients received verapamil or ibutilide in the absence of AF. Atrial ERP was unchanged after verapamil and prolonged after ibutilide. CONCLUSION: Verapamil shortens AFCL and impedes the conversion of induced AF, whereas ibutilide prolongs AFCL and does not impede the early conversion of induced AF. Ibutilide is more effective than verapamil in preventing pos