Suture pattern does not influence outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in obese patients.

Background and study aims ESG is an effective and safe medium-term procedure for obesity treatment. A variety of suture patterns have been reported. We aimed to compare whether there are differences in efficacy depending on suture pattern used. Patients and methods Retrospective and comparative review of 5 years of prospectively collected data, including consecutive obese patients undergoing ESG at two collaborative centers. Primary outcomes included weight loss (mainly % total body weight loss [TBWL] and % exces weight loss [EWL]) at 12 months and safety profile. We compared them according to three suture patterns (transverse bilinear [TBp], longitudinal [Lp] and transverse monolinear [TMp]), and number of sutures (4 - 7) and stitches (< 25, 25 to 30 and > 30) applied. Evolution of major obesity-associated morbidities (hypertension, dyslipidemia, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), sleep obstructive apnea syndrome, and arthropathy) were also described. Results 88 patients (mean age 46.1±12.3 years, 69.3 % female) underwent ESG. Mean body mass index (BMI) at baseline was 39.40 ±â€Š4.69 kg/m². At 1 year, %TBWL was 17.36 ±â€Š6.09 % (%EWL 46.41±20.6 %) with TBWL > 10 % in 95.5 % of patients (EWL > 25 % in 94.3 % of patients). According to pattern, there were no differences in %TBWL but there were in %EWL (43.7 ±â€Š20.4 %, 59.8 ±â€Š18.9 % and 45.4 ±â€Š14.9 % in TBp, Lp and TMp patterns, respectively) ( P  = 0.034). No differences were found related to number of sutures (mean 5.2 ±â€Š0.73, r = 4 - 7) or stitches (mean 27.4 ±â€Š6.50, r = 18 - 50) applied. Forty-three of 72 (59.7 %) major comorbidities were resolved. No serious adverse events were observed with any pattern. Conclusions ESG is an effective procedure at 12-month follow-up for weight loss and comorbidity resolution. All three analyzed patterns are safe and effective without differences in %TBWL, but there was a slight increase in %EWL in Lp, regardless of the number of sutures or stitches applied.

Efficacy and safety of bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopy: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The most critical factor determining the quality of colonoscopy results is the extent of bowel cleansing. AIM: This observational post-marketing study evaluated the efficacy, acceptability and safety of a range of the most commonly used bowel cleansing solutions in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing diagnostic, preventive or follow-up colonoscopy were recruited from 7 centres in Italy, Spain and Greece. METHODS: Quality of bowel preparation was assessed on a 5-point scale and included evaluation of visible bowel surface area and the amount and consistency of residual fluid. Patients evaluated ease of use and palatability. RESULTS: A total of 437 patients took part. Klean-Prep, the most commonly used preparation in this evaluation, achieved the highest score for quality of bowel cleansing and was rated as good or excellent in 72.0% of patients. In dosage-compliant patients, Klean-Prep showed better results in comparison to Fleet Phosphosoda (p < 0.05) in the maximum bowel level reached in the intestine during colonoscopy examinations. All of the bowel cleansing solutions were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The polyethylene glycol-based preparations provided the most adequate cleansing and, of these, Klean-Prep provided the highest "good" or "excellent" level of bowel preparation.