Evaluating serum insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 as markers in prostate cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) lacks specificity and sensitivity in discriminating prostate cancer (PCa) from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) when the total PSA (tPSA) level is between 4 and 10 ng/mL. It remains to be investigated if additional tumor-associated molecules may improve the PCa diagnostic accuracy. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether serum levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and their combinations with PSA may enhance the diagnosis of PCa. METHODS: Serum tPSA and free PSA (fPSA) levels were measured using an automated chemiluminescence-based method. IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels were evaluated by radioimmunoassays in a prospectively and consecutively enrolled subset of 149 patients with tPSA ≤10 ng/mL made up of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; n = 113) and PCa (n = 36). RESULTS: IGF1 and IGFBP3 serum levels did not significantly differ between the PCa and BPH groups. No important correlation was found between the IGF molecules and PSA isoforms in both groups. Statistical analysis of the combination of markers indicated that only the free/total PSA ratio (f/tPSA%) was informative and independent in predicting the presence of PCa, considering that for high values of this percentage (17%) the probability of finding PCa decreased. Receiver operating characteristics areas under the curve (AUC) for IGF1 and IGFBP3 were not informative (AUC ~0.5 in both cases) contrary to the AUC for f/tPSA% (AUC = 0.689, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that neither IGF1 and IGFBP3 alone nor in combination with PSA enhance the diagnostic performance of PSA in PCa.

Bicalutamide monotherapy versus flutamide plus goserelin in prostate cancer: updated results of a multicentric trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of bicalutamide monotherapy to maximal androgen blockade in advanced prostatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with histologically proven stage C or D (American Urological Association Staging System) disease were randomly allocated to either bicalutamide (B) or goserelin plus flutamide (G+F). After disease progression, patients treated with B were assigned to castration. The primary endpoint for this trial was overall survival. Prostate cancer-specific survival and progression were included among secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In total 108 patients received B and 112 received G+F. At a median follow-up time of 54 months (range 1-89), 151 patients progressed and 113 died. There was no significant difference in the duration of either progression-free or overall survival. Hazards of progression, death and cancer-specific death, corrected by disease stage, tumor grade and baseline PSA level, showed that patients initially assigned to B had a higher risk of progression but a comparable risk of death and cancer-specific death with the exception of patients with G3 tumors who had an increased risk of death). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with well or moderately well differentiated tumors, B monotherapy followed by castration may offer the same survival chance as maximal androgen deprivation. In those patients it thus represents a reasonable choice that can avoid the side effects of androgen deprivation for considerable periods of time.