Capsule and Sprinkle Formulations of Lubiprostone Are Not Biologically Similar in Patients with Functional Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Lubiprostone capsules are approved for managing three different chronic constipation conditions. A "sprinkle" formulation may facilitate use in individuals with difficulty swallowing capsules. Our objective was to evaluate the bioequivalence, pharmacokinetics (PK), and bioavailability of lubiprostone sprinkles vs lubiprostone capsules, compared with placebo. METHODS: A 1-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, bioequivalence study (study 302) and a single-dose PK and bioavailability crossover study (study 304) were conducted. In study 302, 522 subjects with chronic constipation were randomized to lubiprostone sprinkle 24 µg twice daily (BID), lubiprostone capsule 24 µg BID, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was observed spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) counts (equivalence defined as showing the 90% confidence interval [CI] of the "between-group SBM ratio" to be contained within 0.8-1.25). Study 304 included two cohorts of healthy volunteers randomized to a single 48-µg lubiprostone dose, sprinkle, or capsule (n = 35) or to a single 48-µg sprinkle dose, in fed or fasted state (n = 14). RESULTS: Both lubiprostone formulations significantly improved SBM count (sprinkle, 4.82 ± 3.66, P = 0.002; capsule, 5.74 ± 3.79, P < 0.0001) vs placebo (3.68 ± 2.16), but equivalent efficacy was not demonstrated, with a 90% CI for the SBM count ratio of 0.69-0.95. Quantifiable PK data on lubiprostone were limited; however, overall exposure to the M3 metabolite was approximately 44% higher with sprinkles vs capsules under fasted conditions (geometric mean ratio 1.441 [90% CI, 1.166, 1.782]), and exposure with the sprinkle formulation was 11% lower in the fed state vs the fasted state (geometric mean ratio 0.888 [90% CI, 0.675, 1.168]). Both formulations were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Despite the significant improvement in SBM counts vs placebo, the sprinkle formulation did not demonstrate bioequivalence to the capsule formulation in either pharmacodynamic or PK key parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study 302: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03097861; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03097861 ; Study 304: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03010631; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03010631 .

Plecanatide Is Effective and Safe in the Treatment for Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: Results of a Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) remain unsatisfied with their treatment options. Plecanatide is a pH-sensitive uroguanylin analog that increases fluid and ion movement into the gastrointestinal lumen, softening stools and encouraging motility, while limiting the risk of diarrhea. AIMS: The objective of this phase 2 study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily oral plecanatide in patients with CIC and identify the most effective dose. METHODS: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was conducted in patients aged 18-75 years and diagnosed with CIC based on modified Rome III criteria (< 3 complete spontaneous bowel movements [CSBMs] per week and infrequent loose stools without the use of laxatives). Participants were randomized to placebo or plecanatide 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of overall CSBM responders. Key secondary endpoints included time to first CSBM, change in CSBM and spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency rates, patient-reported outcomes, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 951 randomized participants, 946 were included in the modified intent-to-treat population. Plecanatide 0.3 and 3.0 mg significantly increased overall CSBM responder rates compared with placebo (0.3 mg, P = 0.016; 3.0 mg, P = 0.009). Plecanatide was associated with decreased time to first CSBM, significant increases in CSBM and SBM frequency, and decreased patient-reported constipation severity compared with placebo. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Plecanatide is a well-tolerated treatment that relieved the symptoms of CIC with a relatively low incidence of diarrhea.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Olorinab, a Peripherally Acting, Highly Selective, Full Agonist of the Cannabinoid Receptor 2, in a Phase 2a Study of Patients With Chronic Abdominal Pain Associated With Crohn's Disease.

Background: This randomized, open-label phase 2a study investigated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of olorinab-a highly selective, peripherally acting, full agonist of the cannabinoid receptor 2-in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) experiencing abdominal pain. Methods: Eligible subjects 18-80 years of age with quiescent to mildly active CD were randomized to receive olorinab 25 or 100 mg three times daily for 8 weeks. The primary objective was to assess safety/tolerability. Results: Fourteen subjects received olorinab 25 mg (N = 6) or 100 mg (N = 8). Ten subjects [4 (67%) in the 25-mg group and 6 (75%) in the 100-mg group] reported a total of 34 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 32 grade 1/2, not serious events; 2 grade 3, serious, not treatment-related events). No dose reductions or discontinuations due to TEAEs or deaths were reported. Dose-proportional increases in olorinab exposure from 25 to 100 mg were observed, with minimal accumulation at both doses. At week 8, the mean (SD) change from baseline in average abdominal pain score at peak olorinab plasma concentrations was -4.61 (1.77) in the 25-mg group (P = 0.0043) and -4.57 (2.17) in the 100-mg group (P = 0.0036). The change from baseline at week 8 in the mean (SD) number of pain-free days per week was +1.60 (2.61) in the 25-mg group and +2.33 (3.62) in the 100-mg group. No subject required pain medication on study. Conclusions: Patients with quiescent to mildly active CD receiving olorinab experienced mild-to-moderate adverse events and an improvement in abdominal pain scores in this study.

Long-term treatment with plecanatide was safe and tolerable in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.

Objective: This open-label, multi-center, fixed-dose study (NCT02706483) evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of plecanatide for the treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C).Methods: Safety and tolerability of once-daily plecanatide 6 mg for up to 53 weeks was assessed in patients with IBS-C who either had been enrolled in one of the phase 3 studies or were study-naïve but met eligibility criteria of the double-blind studies. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). Patient-reported questionnaires assessed overall IBS symptoms, treatment satisfaction, and desire for treatment continuation. No dose adjustments or treatment interruptions were permitted during the study.Results: Of the 2272 patients enrolled, 1842 (81.1%) completed the study. AEs were experienced by 27.3%, and 4.3% discontinued due to an AE. Most AEs were mild or moderate (90.3%). The incidence of diarrhea, the most commonly reported AE, was low (6.7%), and declined in frequency over time. Diarrhea was the most common cause of AE-related withdrawals (2.7% of patients). At week 53 or end of treatment, 88.2% of patients reported "significant" or "moderate" relief, 72.4% were "very" or "quite" satisfied with treatment, and 76.6% were "very" or "quite" likely to continue treatment.Conclusions: Plecanatide 6 mg was safe and well tolerated in patients with IBS-C treated for up to 53 weeks, with an overall safety profile similar to the 12-week IBS-C studies. Patients reported high rates of relief and satisfaction with treatment, and interest in continuing therapy.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02706483.

A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind comparison of remimazolam to placebo for outpatient colonoscopy. This study design was a requirement of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. An additional group was randomized to open-label midazolam administered according to its package insert instructions (the randomization ratio for remimazolam:placebo:midazolam was 30:6:10). Study medications were administered under the supervision of the endoscopist, without any involvement of an anesthesia specialist. Patients were given 50 to 75 µg of fentanyl before receiving study medications. Patients who failed to achieve adequate sedation in any arm were rescued with midazolam dosed at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was a composite that required 3 criteria be met: completion of the colonoscopy, no need for rescue medication, and ≤5 doses of remimazolam or placebo in any 15-minute interval (≤3 doses of midazolam in any 12-minute interval in the open-label midazolam arm). RESULTS: There were 461 randomized patients in 12 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was met for remimazolam, placebo, and midazolam in 91.3%, 1.7%, and 25.2% of patients, respectively (P < .0001 for remimazolam vs placebo). Patients administered remimazolam received less fentanyl, had faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function, were ready for discharge earlier, and felt back to normal sooner than patients with both placebo and midazolam. Hypotension was less frequent with remimazolam, and hypoxia occurred in 1% of patients with remimazolam or midazolam. There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Remimazolam can be administered safely under the supervision of endoscopists for outpatient colonoscopy, and it allows faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function compared with placebo (midazolam rescue) and midazolam. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02290873.).

Safety and tolerability of plecanatide in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation: long-term evidence from an open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: This multi-center, fixed-dose, open-label study evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of once-daily oral plecanatide for the treatment of adults with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). METHODS: Eligible patients completed a phase 2b or phase 3 double-blind study of plecanatide, or had not previously been treated with plecanatide. Enrolled patients received plecanatide (3 or 6 mg) for up to 72 weeks. Safety and tolerability were assessed by the incidence, nature, and severity of spontaneously reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Patients also completed Patient Global Assessment questionnaires, which included measures of treatment satisfaction and the desire to continue treatment. RESULTS: There were 2370 patient exposures in this study, with the vast majority (90.5%) receiving treatment with plecanatide 6 mg. At the time of study closure, 1932 (81.5%) had completed or were still receiving study drug. TEAEs were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those observed in prior double-blind studies. The most common TEAEs were diarrhea (7.1%) and urinary tract infection (2.2%). TEAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 5.3% of patients, with diarrhea leading to discontinuation in 3.1%. Most TEAEs were mild/moderate in severity and were generally considered not related to plecanatide treatment. At the end of treatment, the median score for treatment satisfaction was 4.0 (quite satisfied), and the median score for treatment continuation was 4.0 (quite likely). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment of adults with CIC demonstrated that plecanatide was safe and well tolerated, with low TEAE and discontinuation rates. Patients indicated satisfaction and a desire to continue with plecanatide treatment.

Epitope-specific immunotherapy targeting CD4-positive T cells in coeliac disease: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies.

BACKGROUND: A gluten-free diet is the only means to manage coeliac disease, a permanent immune intolerance to gluten. We developed a therapeutic vaccine, Nexvax2, designed to treat coeliac disease. Nexvax2 is an adjuvant-free mix of three peptides that include immunodominant epitopes for gluten-specific CD4-positive T cells. The vaccine is intended to engage and render gluten-specific CD4-positive T cells unresponsive to further antigenic stimulation. We assessed the safety and pharmacodynamics of the vaccine in patients with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet. METHODS: We did two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 studies at 12 community sites in Australia, New Zealand, and the USA, in HLA-DQ2·5-positive patients aged 18-70 years who had coeliac disease and were on a gluten-free diet. In the screening period for ascending dose cohorts, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by central randomisation with a simple block method to a double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled oral gluten challenge. Participants with a negative interferon γ release assay to Nexvax2 peptides after the screening oral gluten challenge were discontinued before dosing. For the biopsy cohorts, the screening period included an endoscopy, and participants with duodenal histology who had a Marsh score of greater than 1 were discontinued before dosing. Participants were subsequently randomly assigned to either Nexvax2 or placebo in ascending dose cohorts (2:1) and in biopsy cohorts (1:1) by central randomisation with a simple block method. In the three-dose study, participants received either Nexvax2 60 µg, 90 µg, or 150 µg weekly, or placebo over 15 days; in a fourth biopsy cohort, patients received either Nexvax2 at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or placebo. In the 16-dose study, participants received Nexvax2 150 µg or 300 µg or placebo twice weekly over 53 days; in a third biopsy cohort, patients also received either Nexvax2 at the MTD or placebo. In the 4-week post-treatment period, ascending dose cohorts underwent a further double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled oral gluten challenge, which had a fixed sequence, and biopsy cohorts had a gastroscopy with duodenal biopsies and quantitative histology within 2 weeks without oral gluten challenge. Participants, investigators, and study staff were masked to the treatment assignment, except for the study pharmacist. The primary endpoint was the number and percentage of adverse events in the treatment period in an intention-to-treat analysis. Both trials were completed and closed before data analysis. Trials were registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, numbers ACTRN12612000355875 and ACTRN12613001331729. FINDINGS: Participants were enrolled from Nov 28, 2012, to Aug 14, 2014, in the three-dose study, and from Aug 3, 2012, to Sept 10, 2013, in the 16-dose study. Overall, 62 (57%) of 108 participants were randomly assigned after oral gluten challenge and 20 (71%) of 28 participants were randomly assigned after endoscopy. In the three-dose study, nine participants were randomly allocated to Nexvax2 60 µg and three to placebo (first cohort), nine were allocated to Nexvax2 90 µg and four to placebo (second cohort), eight were allocated to Nexvax2 150 µg and four to placebo (third cohort), and three were allocated to Nexvax2 150 µg and three to placebo (biopsy cohort). In the 16-dose study, eight participants were randomly allocated to Nexvax2 150 µg and four to placebo (first cohort), ten were allocated to Nexvax2 300 µg and three to placebo (second cohort), and seven were allocated to Nexvax2 150 µg and seven to placebo (biopsy cohort). The MTD for Nexvax2 was 150 µg because of transient, acute gastrointestinal adverse events with onset 2-5 h after initial doses of the vaccine, similar to those caused by gluten ingestion. In the ascending dose cohorts in the three-dose study, six (55%) of 11 placebo recipients, five (56%) of nine who received Nexvax2 60 µg, seven (78%) of nine who received Nexvax2 90 µg, and five (63%) of eight who received Nexvax2 150 µg had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, as did all three (100%) placebo recipients and one (33%) of three Nexvax2 150 µg recipients in the biopsy cohort. In the ascending dose cohorts of the 16-dose study, five (71%) of seven placebo-treated participants, six (75%) of eight who received Nexvax2 150 µg, and all ten (100%) who received Nexvax2 300 µg had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, as did six (86%) of seven placebo recipients and five (71%) of seven Nexvax2 150 µg recipients in the biopsy cohort. Vomiting, nausea, and headache were the only treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred in at least 5% of participants in either study. Among participants given the MTD, eight gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in four (50%) of eight participants in the third cohort and none (0%) of three participants in the biopsy cohort in the three-dose study, and five events occurred in five (63%) of eight participants in the first cohort and three events in two (29%) of seven participants in the biopsy cohort of the 16-dose study. Median villous height to crypt depth ratio in distal duodenal biopsies was not significantly different between those who received the vaccine at the MTD on either schedule and those who received placebo. Of the participants who completed the post-treatment oral gluten challenge per protocol, interferon γ release assay to Nexvax2 peptides was negative (responders to treatment) in two (22%) of nine placebo-treated participants in the three-dose study versus two (33%) of six who received Nexvax2 60 µg, five (63%) of eight who received Nexvax2 90 µg, and six (100%) of six who received Nexvax2 150 µg (p=0·007); in the 16-dose study, none (0%) of five placebo-treated participants had a negative assay versus six (75%) of eight who received Nexvax2 150 µg (p=0·021). INTERPRETATION: The MTD of Nexvax2 was 150 µg for twice weekly intradermal administration over 8 weeks, which modified immune responsiveness to Nexvax2 peptides without deterioration in duodenal histology. The gastrointestinal symptoms that followed the first intradermal administration of the vaccine resembled those associated with oral gluten challenge. These findings support continued clinical development of this potential therapeutic vaccine for coeliac disease. FUNDING: ImmusanT.

Ferumoxytol versus placebo in iron deficiency anemia: efficacy, safety, and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders and can adversely affect quality of life. Oral iron is poorly tolerated in many patients with GI disorders. Ferumoxytol is approved for the intravenous treatment of IDA in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ferumoxytol in patients with IDA and concomitant GI disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This analysis included 231 patients with IDA and GI disorders from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating ferumoxytol (510 mg ×2) versus placebo in patients who had failed or were intolerant of oral iron therapy. The primary study end point was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥20 g/L increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) from baseline to Week 5. Other end points included mean change in Hgb, proportion of patients achieving Hgb ≥120 g/L, mean change in transferrin saturation, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: Significantly more patients with IDA receiving ferumoxytol achieved a ≥20 g/L increase in Hgb versus placebo (82.1% vs 1.7%, respectively; P<0.001). Mean increase in Hgb (28.0 g/L vs -1.0 g/L, respectively; P<0.001) significantly favored ferumoxytol treatment. Ferumoxytol-treated patients demonstrated significantly greater improvements than placebo-treated patients relative to their very poor baseline PRO scores posttreatment, including improvements in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire and various domains of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Ferumoxytol-treated patients had a low rate of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this study, ferumoxytol was shown to be an efficacious and generally well-tolerated treatment option for patients with IDA and underlying GI disorders who were unable to use or had a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy.

Burden of Iron Deficiency Anemia in a Bariatric Surgery Population in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a serious condition affecting more than 35% of adults in the United States. In obese individuals for whom other weight control methods have been ineffective, bariatric surgery is a safe and effective method of weight control. An estimated 150,000 to 160,000 bariatric surgeries are performed in the United States yearly. Iron deficiency anemia is common in patients after bariatric surgery, with incidence rates up to 49%, and may be due to malabsorption of nutrients.  OBJECTIVES: To (a) compare the medical resource utilization (MRU)- both medical care and treatment resources-and associated costs in a sample of commercially insured adult bariatric surgery patients with and without iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and (b) describe anti-anemia treatment patterns in those bariatric surgery patients diagnosed with IDA. METHODS: Using Truven Health MarketScan claims data, bariatric surgery patients were identified by the ICD-9-CM and CPT procedure codes for bariatric surgery and classified by surgery and IDA diagnosis within 2 years of initial surgery. Intravenous (IV) iron treatment was determined by HCPCS codes, prescription oral iron by NDC numbers, and blood transfusions by CPT and ICD-9-CM codes. Clinical, MRU, and economic outcomes for all-cause health services were compared between IDA and non-IDA patients. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics on outcomes of complications and hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 24,344 bariatric surgery patients analyzed, 11.6% received an IDA diagnosis 2 years after surgery (average days to diagnosis = 279). Most IDA patients (78.5%) received a test for iron in the post-index period; only 9.1% received IV iron treatment, with iron dextran (3.8%) and iron sucrose (3.4%) being the most common (average days to IV iron treatment = 403 days). Prescription oral iron was found in 4.9% of all IDA patients (average days to oral iron treatment = 476.7). Approximately 9% of IDA patients received a blood transfusion (average days to transfusion = 304.8). For the total sample, the average age was 46 years with a higher percentage of females (83.9% IDA; 78.7% non-IDA). Most clinical characteristics were similar among patients with and without IDA, except heart disease (1.3% IDA vs. 0.8% non-IDA; P = 0.005) and gallbladder disease (0.0% IDA vs. 0.2% non-IDA; P = 0.037). More IDA patients had complications after surgery (40.4% vs. 27.7%; P less than 0.001), such as nonabsorption (22.4% vs. 16.5%; P less than 0.001); digestive (15.6% vs. 10.2%; P less than 0.001); and gastrojejunal ulcer (7.6% vs. 2.0%; P less than 0.001). Multivariate results showed that IDA patients were more likely to have a bariatric surgery complication over non-IDA patients (OR = 1.367, 95% CI = 1.257-1.487; P less than 0.05). Adjusted results showed IDA patients more than twice as likely to be hospitalized (OR = 2.567, 95% CI = 2.363-2.790; P less than 0.05). Total costs were twice as much in the IDA group compared with the non-IDA group ($37,882 vs. $19,253; P less than 0.001).  CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery patients who develop IDA may be subject to higher complication rates, MRU, and direct medical costs. Although most bariatric surgery patients who develop IDA are tested for iron, most are not treated with IV iron or oral iron and do not receive blood transfusions. Further research is needed to determine if IDA is a result of bariatric surgery complications or a predictor of increased MRU and costs.

A multicenter, randomized, active-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron deficiency anemia.

BACKGROUND: Many patients receiving oral iron for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) cannot tolerate or fail to respond to therapy, and existing intravenous (IV) iron formulations often require repeated administrations. Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), a nondextran IV formulation, permits larger single doses. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated FCM versus oral iron in IDA patients. After 14 days of oral iron, 507 participants responding inadequately to oral iron (hemoglobin [Hb] increase <1 g/dL; Cohort 1) were assigned to Group A (two doses of FCM, 750 mg, 1 week apart) or Group B (oral iron, 325 mg, 3 × day for 14 additional days). Also, 504 subjects not appropriate for oral iron (Cohort 2) were assigned to Group C (FCM as above) or Group D (standard-of-care IV iron). The primary efficacy endpoint was change to highest observed Hb from baseline to Day 35. The composite safety endpoint included all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, unstable angina, heart failure, arrhythmias, and hyper- or hypotensive events. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) Hb increase was significantly greater in Group A-FCM than Group B-oral iron: 1.57 (±1.19) g/dL versus 0.80 (±0.80) g/dL (p = 0.001). Post hoc comparison of Group C-FCM and Group D-IV standard of care also demonstrated significant mean (±SD) increase in Hb from baseline to highest value by Day 35 in Group C versus Group D: 2.90 (±1.64) g/dL versus 2.16 (±1.25) g/dL (p = 0.001). Safety endpoints occurred in 17 of 499 (3.4%) participants receiving FCM versus 16 of 498 (3.2%) in comparator groups. CONCLUSION: Two 750-mg FCM infusions are safe and superior to oral iron in increasing Hb levels in IDA patients with inadequate oral iron response.

Nitroglycerin 0.4% ointment vs placebo in the treatment of pain resulting from chronic anal fissure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Complications of chronic anal fissure (CAF) treatments are prompting interest in lower-risk therapies. This study was conducted to compare nitroglycerin (NTG) 0.4% ointment with placebo for pain associated with CAF. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with one CAF and moderate-to-severe pain (≥50 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) received 375 mg NTG 0.4% (1.5 mg active ingredient) or 375 mg placebo ointment applied anally every 12 hours for 21 days. The primary end point was change from baseline VAS score in 24-hour pain averaged over days 14-18. Review of data from patients who withdrew early was blinded to treatment. To control for the confounding effects of analgesics, all patients received 650 mg acetaminophen for headache prophylaxis before each application. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were enrolled (NTG, n = 123; placebo, n = 124). The prespecified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) analysis found no significant difference between groups; however, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis showed a significant advantage for NTG. A post hoc analysis (LOCF/BOCF hybrid) demonstrated a significant adjusted mean difference of -7.0 mm in favor of NTG 0.4% (95% CI -13.6, -0.4; P = .038). Headache was the most common adverse event in the NTG (69.9%) and placebo (47.6%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first placebo-controlled study that also controlled for the confounding effects of analgesics used to treat NTG-induced headache. In patients with moderate-to-severe CAF pain, NTG 0.4% ointment effectively reduced CAF pain compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00522041.

Comparative review of the safety and efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose versus standard medical care for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in bariatric and gastric surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common finding in patients after bariatric surgery. The cause is multifactorial including reduced oral iron intake and malabsorption. While many patients can be managed with oral supplements, parenteral iron may be needed to restore and maintain iron stores. METHODS: Subjects who had previous bariatric surgery and had participated in phase 3 industry-sponsored clinical trials designed to assess the safety and/or efficacy of intravenous (IV) ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) were retrospectively selected from the databases of each of these studies. Demographic data, efficacy measures [hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT)], and adverse events were compared between FCM and other agents utilized as comparators in the trials. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one subjects from the intention to treat (ITT) population were included (mean age 49 years, BMI 33 kg/m(2), including 253 females). FCM had similar or improved efficacy (p < 0.05) in terms of increasing hemoglobin, ferritin, and TSAT values when compared to other iron products used as standard of care for IDA. The incidence of adverse events in the FCM patients (n = 123) versus patients receiving any IV iron (n = 126) was 61 and 56.3 %, respectively. The adverse events were similar in both groups with the exception of a transient decrease in serum phosphate which was observed more frequently in the FCM group. CONCLUSIONS: These data in post-bariatric surgery IDA patients suggest that FCM is a safe and effective alternative to existing iron products permitting higher and thus less frequent individual doses.

Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose (750 mg) in the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia: Two Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Background. Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common hematological complication with potentially serious clinical consequences that may require intravenous iron therapy. Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is a stable, nondextran iron formulation administered intravenously in large single doses to treat IDA. Objective. Two open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluated safety of multiple or single 750 mg FCM doses compared to standard medical care (SMC) in IDA patients. Secondary endpoints were improvements in hemoglobin and iron indices. Design and Patients. Adults with hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL, ferritin ≤100 or ≤300 ng/mL with transferrin saturation ≤30% were randomized to receive single (n = 366) or weekly (n = 343) FCM or SMC (n = 360 and n = 366). Results. Significantly greater (P ≤ 0.001) increases in hemoglobin and iron indices occurred in FCM groups versus SMC. In the multidose study, up to two infusions of FCM were needed to reach target iron levels versus 3-5 of intravenous iron comparators. FCM and SMC groups had similar incidences and types of adverse events and serious adverse events. Transient hypophosphatemia not associated with adverse events or clinical sequelae occurred in the FCM groups. Conclusion. Intravenous FCM is safe, well tolerated, and associated with improvements in hemoglobin and iron indices comparable to SMC when administered in single doses of up to 750 mg at a rate of 100 mg/min. Fewer FCM infusions were required to reach target iron levels compared to other intravenous iron preparations.

Comparison of preference and safety of powder and liquid lactulose in adult patients with chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation is an important clinical condition which can result in serious discomfort and even require hospitalization. Powder and liquid lactulose are designated as clinically equivalent for the treatment of constipation, but there are significant differences in the taste, consistency, and portability of the products, which may affect patient compliance and therefore clinical outcome. AIM: To evaluate patient preference between powder and liquid lactulose in terms of overall preference, taste, consistency, and portability, and safety in terms of adverse events. METHODS: Three sites randomized patients (total n = 50) to powder or liquid lactulose for seven days with crossover. Patient preference was assessed by a questionnaire, and the occurrence of adverse events was monitored. RESULTS: Of those expressing a preference, 44% and 57% more patients preferred the taste and consistency, respectively, of powder over liquid lactulose. More than six times as many patients preferred the portability of powder compared with liquid lactulose and, overall, 77% more patients preferred powder over liquid lactulose. There was no difference between treatment groups in terms of adverse events (P = 0.635). CONCLUSIONS: More patients preferred powder compared with liquid lactulose and the products were equally safe. These findings may impact patient compliance, and therefore may affect clinical outcome.

Efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in patients with chronic constipation.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in adults with chronic constipation. METHODS: This multicenter, parallel-group trial enrolled 237 patients with chronic constipation and randomized them to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with oral lubiprostone 24 mcg or placebo twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) after 1 week of treatment. Secondary evaluations included SBMs at weeks 2, 3, and 4; percentage of patients with a SBM within 24 h of first study dose; stool consistency; degree of straining; constipation severity; abdominal bloating and discomfort; global treatment effectiveness; and safety assessments. RESULTS: Lubiprostone-treated patients experienced greater mean numbers of SBMs at week 1 compared with placebo (5.89 versus 3.99, P = 0.0001), with significantly greater percentages having SBMs within 24 h of the first dose (61.3% versus 31.4%, P < 0.0001). At each assessment, SBM frequency and percentages of full responders (> or =4 SBM per week) were significantly greater among lubiprostone-treated patients compared with placebo (P < or = 0.0171). Lubiprostone-treated patients reported significant improvements in stool consistency, straining, and constipation severity at all weeks, and in abdominal bloating at week 1. Patient assessments of treatment effectiveness were significantly greater with lubiprostone compared with placebo at all weeks (P < 0.0004). Gastrointestinal-related disorders were the most common adverse events in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic constipation, lubiprostone produced a bowel movement in the majority of individuals within 24 h of initial dosing, with sustained improvement in frequency as well as other constipation symptoms over 4 weeks of treatment.

Safety and tolerability of concurrent natalizumab treatment for patients with Crohn's disease not in remission while receiving infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG(4) antibody to alpha4 integrin, was investigated as a treatment of active Crohn's disease (CD). The safety of natalizumab given in combination with infliximab has not previously been studied. METHODS: Seventy-nine adult patients with active CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score > or = 150) despite ongoing infliximab treatment were randomized 2:1 to receive 3 intravenous infusions of natalizumab (300 mg; n = 52) or placebo (n = 27) every 4 weeks. Patients received infliximab (5 mg/kg) every 8 weeks for at least 10 weeks before randomization and throughout the study. The primary objective was to assess the short-term safety and tolerability of natalizumab in patients concurrently receiving infliximab. Secondary and tertiary objectives included measures of efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and effects on inflammatory markers. A subset of patients also participated in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of the effects of concurrent treatment. RESULTS: Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in the treatment groups. AEs frequently reported in both groups were headache, CD exacerbation, nausea, and nasopharyngitis. No patient had a hypersensitivity-like reaction to natalizumab, whereas 4 patients (5%) experienced reactions to infliximab. Two patients (4%) developed anti-natalizumab antibodies; 10 patients (14%) developed anti-infliximab antibodies. The mean CDAI score decreased with natalizumab plus infliximab but was unchanged with infliximab alone (-37.7 versus +3.5; P = 0.084). Patients in both groups showed small increases in HRQoL (P = 0.811). No drug-drug interactions were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of natalizumab plus infliximab was well tolerated. Several positive trends suggested that treating patients not in remission with infliximab plus natalizumab had greater efficacy than treatment with infliximab alone.

Tolerability and patient acceptance of sodium phosphate tablets compared with 4-L PEG solution in colon cleansing: combined results of 2 identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase 3 trials.

GOALS: Evaluate patient tolerance and acceptance of a sodium phosphate (NaP) tablet purgative compared with a 4-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. BACKGROUND: Characteristics and side effects of bowel purgatives deter patients from undergoing screening colonoscopy. Published data demonstrated comparable bowel cleansing with NaP tablets and a 4-L PEG solution in 2 phase for 3 studies. This report presents data on patient tolerability and acceptance. STUDY: Two identically designed, randomized, investigator-blinded, and multicenter trials were performed. Tolerability and patient acceptance were based on purgative regimen compliance, incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, and patient responses to questionnaires. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-five patients were assessed (420 and 425 in the tablet and PEG solution groups, respectively). Patient compliance with the tablet regimen was greater: 94% of patients took all the tablets compared with 57% completing the PEG solution regimen (P<0.0001). Nausea, vomiting, and bloating occurred significantly less often in patients taking NaP tablets (P<0.0001). Among patients taking tablets, 88.4% rated them "easy" or "slightly difficult" to take, compared with 60.6% of patients taking the PEG solution. The preparation's taste was rated "barely tolerable" or "not tolerable" by 1% of patients treated with NaP tablets and 23.6% treated with PEG solution. Drinking the required volume of clear liquid for the tablet or PEG preparation was rated "easy" or "slightly difficult" by 92.2% and 66.9% of patients, respectively. Almost all (90.7%) patients taking the tablets indicated they would take the same preparation in the future, compared with 67.1% of patients taking the PEG solution (P<0.0001 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Tolerability and patient acceptance of a NaP tablet purgative were superior to 4-L PEG solution.

Safety and colon-cleansing efficacy of a new residue-free formulation of sodium phosphate tablets.

OBJECTIVE: A residue-free sodium phosphate tablet (RF-NaP) was formulated that lacks microcrystalline cellulose, which can appear as a whitish residue in the colon. A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study was conducted to compare the colon-cleansing efficacy of 40 or 32 tablets of RF-NaP with the marketed 40-tablet NaP treatment regimen. METHODS: Eight hundred sixteen patients were randomized prior to colonoscopy to receive either 40 tablets (60 g) of NaP or RF-NaP or 32 tablets (48 g) of RF-NaP. Colon cleansing was assessed using a 4-point scale based on retained "colonic contents." The primary end point was overall colon-cleansing response rate to treatment (score of excellent/good) versus nonresponse (fair/inadequate). RESULTS: Seven hundred four patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The overall colon-cleansing response rates were comparable among treatment arms (94.5%, 97.0%, and 95.3% for NaP, RF-NaP 40, and RF-NaP 32 tablets, respectively). Ascending colon-cleansing response rates for RF-NaP 40 (95.7%) and 32 tablets (93.6%) were significantly better than for NaP tablets (88.5%, p < 0.03 for both). Patients treated with RF-NaP 32 tablets experienced less pronounced changes in electrolyte levels and fewer adverse events (138/239, 58%) compared with patients receiving NaP (161/238, 68%, p= 0.07) and RF-NaP 40 tablets (156/236, 66%, p= 0.03). The most common adverse events reported were abdominal distention, nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the safety, efficacy, and patient preferences, the 32-tablet RF-NaP regimen was superior to the 40-tablet RF-NaP and NaP regimen for colon cleansing prior to colonoscopy.

A phase 1/2A trial of STA 5326, an oral interleukin-12/23 inhibitor, in patients with active moderate to severe Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal inflammation associated with Crohn's disease is characterized by a type 1 helper T cell response and elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-12. We report our clinical experience with a novel oral IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor (STA 5326) for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an open-label, dose-escalating trial of the orally delivered small molecule immunomodulator STA 5326 in 73 patients with active Crohn's disease (Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] 220-450, inclusive). Five cohorts of patients were treated for up to 4 weeks with 14 mg twice a day (bid), 35 mg daily (qd), 28 mg bid, 35 mg bid, or 70 mg qd. The endpoints of the study included safety and improvement in clinical activity measured by the CDAI and the Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity. RESULTS: STA 5326 was well tolerated. Reported adverse events were similar across dose cohorts. The most common (>15%) drug-related adverse events observed were dizziness, nausea, headache, and fatigue. Clinical activity at day 28/29 was observed at qd doses of 28 mg and above for the clinical endpoints of response and remission: 70 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 42%-82% of patients); 100 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 38%-64% of patients), and CDAI <150 (range 15%-36%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral qd dosing of STA 5326 for 4 weeks was well tolerated in doses up to 70 mg qd in patients with active moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Clinical activity was observed at qd doses of 28 mg and above.