Randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of effect of nitroglycerin ointment on pain after hemorrhoidectomy.

PURPOSE: Fissure-in-ano is characterized by pain, bleeding, and internal anal sphincter hypertonicity. Spasm of the internal sphincter also plays a role in hemorrhoidal disease and may be a source of anal pain after hemorrhoid surgery. Inducing sphincter relaxation with a nitroglycerin ointment has shown promise in healing anal fissures and relieving symptoms of pain. Our study attempts to test the hypothesis that topical nitroglycerin applied to the perianal region is beneficial in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: After hemorrhoidectomy 39 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.2 percent nitroglycerin ointment (n = 19) or placebo (n = 20). Ointments were applied to the perianal region three times daily for seven days. Patients were prescribed hydrocodone bitartrate to take as needed. Visual analog scales were used to measure postoperative pain intensity and ointment benefits. Patients completed questionnaires to record medication morbidity and number of prescribed or nonprescribed medications taken. RESULTS: Patients using nitroglycerin had less pain and greater benefit from ointment than those did in the placebo group, but differences were not significant. Narcotic use was higher in the placebo group when considered on a daily basis, but was statistically significant on the second postoperative day only (P < 0.05). Morbidity from ointment application was significantly higher in the nitroglycerin group (P < 0.002) and included a headache in 8 of 19 patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen were not prescribed, but were taken more frequently in nitroglycerin patients (P < 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Perianal application of 0.2 percent nitroglycerin ointment after hemorrhoidectomy significantly reduced narcotic requirements on the second postoperative day. Headaches and a subsequent need for nonnarcotic medications may limit benefits of nitroglycerin.

Is total colonic evaluation for anal cancer necessary?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of total colonic evaluation in patients diagnosed with anal cancer. We reviewed the cases of 69 patients treated for neoplasm of the anus from January 1973 through November 1998. Patients underwent a barium enema, flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy; findings from these procedures were analyzed. Anal pathology included: squamous cell carcinoma, 48 patients (72%); adenocarcinoma, 6 patients (9%); and squamous cell carcinoma in situ, 10 patients (15%). Chemoradiation was completed in 41 patients (61%), and 6 patients (9%) underwent abdominal perineal resection. Wide excision was the primary therapy in 15 patients (22%). Procedures included: colonoscopy, 31 patients (46%); flexible sigmoidoscopy only, 15 patients (22%); barium enema only, 3 patients (5%); and a combination of flexible sigmoidoscopy and barium enema, 18 patients (27%). Eighty-five per cent of patients had a normal colonic evaluation. Ten patients (15%) had single or multiple polyps identified. Six adenomatous polyps and two hyperplastic polyps were found. No synchronous colorectal malignancy was identified. We conclude that colonoscopy is an integral part of colonic surveillance in patients diagnosed with anal carcinoma, but our study fails to find evidence to support such intervention. The standard screening recommendation for colorectal cancer based on age and risk factors is appropriate intervention for patients diagnosed with anal cancer; anal cancer itself does not appear to be one of these risk factors.

Use or misuse of colostomy to heal pressure ulcers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of colostomy performed as an adjunct measure in the attempt to heal pressure ulcers by flap closure. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent colostomy for healing of pressure ulcers were studied by chart review and patient questionnaire. Fecal diversion was accomplished by colostomy in each case. RESULTS: There were four (15 percent) deaths. Twenty-three patients subsequently underwent flap closure of their ulcer. Of 19 patients available for follow-up, only 6 (32 percent) patients had completely healed, although most patients thought their quality of life improved because of the colostomy. None of the patients underwent colostomy closure. CONCLUSION: Our conclusions are that, although most patients will have an improved quality of life subsequent to diversion, the high mortality and low rate of pressure ulcer healing should temper enthusiasm for performing colostomy in this setting.

Anal and ileal pouch manometric measurements before ileostomy closure are related to functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Anal canal length, and canal resting and squeeze pressures, ileal pouch capacity and pouch compliance were measured in 104 patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis but before ileostomy closure. The intention was to determine if such parameters were associated with late functional outcome after re-establishment of intestinal continuity. Functional outcome in terms of stool frequency (day and night), incontinence (day and night), perianal pad use, perianal skin irritation, and the use of constipating agents was assessed for all 104 patients 1 year or more (median 438 days) after ileostomy closure. A low mean anal sphincter resting pressure before ileostomy closure was associated with subsequent nocturnal incontinence (P less than 0.05) and, to a lesser extent, the need to use constipating agents (P = 0.08). Pouch compliance if low before ileostomy closure was associated with an increased frequency of nocturnal stool frequency after 1 year (P less than 0.05). Anal canal length, and sphincter squeeze pressure and pouch capacity before ileostomy closure were not related to subsequent functional outcome in these patients.

Scintigraphic assessment of the anorectal angle in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

To determine whether the anorectal angle was preserved after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, a simple, safe, low-radiation, real-time method of imaging the anorectum was developed. A cylindrical balloon was placed in the neorectum and anal canal and filled with a solution of 99mTc in water. A gamma camera then imaged the angulation of the balloon while the subject was at rest, during sphincteric squeeze, and during a Valsalva maneuver. Thirteen healthy volunteers and six patients were studied after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. An angle was identified in all controls and patients. In the lateral decubitus position at rest, the mean anorectal angle in controls (102 +/- 18 degrees; SD) and anopouch angle in patients (108 +/- 19 degrees) were similar (p = 0.3). Sitting straightened the angle in both groups (p less than 0.03), whereas sphincteric squeeze and a Valsalva maneuver sharpened the angle in both the sitting and standing positions (p less than 0.03). In the lateral decubitus position, however, the pouch group was less able to sharpen the angle than were the controls (p = 0.04). In controls, the anorectal junction descended during sitting and elevated during squeeze (p less than 0.03), but this did not occur in the pouch group. In conclusion, maneuvers favoring or stressing continence (squeeze, Valsalva) sharpened the anorectal angle and elevated the pelvic floor, whereas a maneuver favoring defecation (sitting) straightened the angle and caused the pelvic floor to descend. After ileal-anal anastomosis, the angle and its movements (except those while lying) were similar to controls. Elevation of the pelvic floor during squeeze, however, was decreased, indicating a decreased mobility of the pelvic floor after operation.

A reappraisal of surgical management in necrotizing perineal infections.

The proper treatment of necrotizing perineal infections (Fournier's gangrene) remains unclear in the surgical literature. This study reports a technique that emphasizes anatomic considerations in the diagnosis and treatment of these infections together with mandatory use of colostomy in selected cases. Eight cases treated at William Beaumont Hospital from 1977 to 1985 were reviewed. There were five men and three women. All had predisposing local pathology. Recognizing the site of local pathology is the key factor in making correct surgical judgments in these cases. The perineum may be divided into the urogenital triangle and anal triangle by a line passing between the ischial tuberosities. Cases originating in the urogenital triangle were treated with antibiotics and wide surgical debridement. Two cases were successfully managed in this fashion. Cases originating in the anal triangle were treated with mandatory colostomy and mucus fistula with irrigation of the rectal segment together with antibiotics and wide debridement. Six cases were found to have originated in the anal triangle. Four were successfully treated. This anatomic approach and proper use of colostomy represents the correct treatment of these infections.