Beta-blocker therapy in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. CAST Investigators.

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) showed antiarrhythmic drug suppression of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of myocardial infarction to be harmful. This study retrospectively searched the CAST results for evidence of mortality and morbidity reduction in patients receiving optional beta-blocker therapy. All enrolled (n = 2,611) and suppressed main study (n = 1,735) CAST patients with an ejection fraction of < or = 40% were examined using univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and a Cox proportional-hazards multivariate analysis with respect to optional beta-blocker therapy prescribed at baseline. CAST patients receiving beta-blocker therapy had significantly enhanced survival at 30 days, and at 1 and 2 years of follow-up against all-cause and arrhythmic death or nonfatal cardiac arrest. Multivariate analysis showed beta-blocker therapy to be independently associated with a one-third reduction in arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest (p = 0.036). In CAST patients with a history of congestive heart failure, beta-blocker therapy was independently associated with longer time to occurrence of new or worsened congestive heart failure (p = 0.015). This study supports the secondary preventive benefit of beta-blocker therapy in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients, and calls attention to the possible preventive benefit of beta-blocker therapy against proarrhythmic events experienced in the CAST.

Circadian pattern of arrhythmic death in patients receiving encainide, flecainide or moricizine in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on the timing of arrhythmic death. BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death remains a problem of epidemic proportions. Delineating its pathophysiology is an important step in devising preventive measures. Previous studies have shown a circadian pattern of onset of sudden cardiac death. The effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on this pattern has not been systematically studied. METHODS: The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) was a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to determine whether suppression of ventricular ectopic activity by means of antiarrhythmic drugs (encainide, flecainide or moricizine) after acute myocardial infarction would reduce the incidence of arrhythmic death. RESULTS: The trial was terminated prematurely because of an unexpectedly high mortality rate in the active treatment group. The onset of arrhythmic death in this group (in patients not receiving beta-adrenergic blocking agents) displayed a bimodal variation, with significant peaks in midmorning and late afternoon/early evening. More than half of the symptomatic events were accompanied by anginalike symptoms. Approximately 30% of all events occurred within 2 h of awakening. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the possibility of a complex interaction among antiarrhythmic drugs, sympathetic nervous system activation and acute myocardial ischemia. Planning of future antiarrhythmic drug trials will need to take this information into account.

Effects of advancing age on the efficacy and side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs in post-myocardial infarction patients with ventricular arrhythmias. The CAST Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of age on the response to anti-arrhythmic drugs. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing particular drugs. SETTING: Multi-institutional (The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, CAST). PARTICIPANTS: 2,371 patients, age less than 80, with ventricular arrhythmias after a recent myocardial infarction. Subjects classified by age as less than or equal to 55, 56-65, and 66-79 years. INTERVENTION: Upwardly titrated doses of encainide, flecainide or moricizine. After identification of a tolerated and effective dose of one of the drugs, participants were randomized to that drug and dose versus its placebo for up to 10 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy of drug (suppression of ventricular premature depolarizations and/or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia), side effects and mortality. RESULTS: Older patients had more previous MIs, congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension, NSVT, repolarization abnormalities, digitalis use, and diuretic use. They had less pathologic Q-waves or electrocardiographic injury pattern, and their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower. First dose VPD suppression with the first drug averaged 53% and is not associated with age (P = 0.29). Adverse events including death are more frequent in older patients taking study drugs (P less than 0.001). This trend is consistent in all three study drugs and at varying LVEFs. History of prior MI, low LVEF, VPD (in log scale), and digitalis therapy also correlates with adverse events (all P less than 0.05). Following adjustment for these factors, older age is an independent predictor of adverse events (relative risk 1.30 per decade of age, P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older age increases the susceptibility to adverse cardiac events from a class of relatively toxic antiarrhythmic agents.

Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular ectopy after a myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of sudden death, patients in whom ventricular ectopy could be suppressed with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine were randomly assigned to receive either active drug or placebo. The use of encainide and flecainide was discontinued because of excess mortality. We examined the mortality and morbidity after randomization to encainide or flecainide or their respective placebo. RESULTS: Of 1498 patients, 857 were assigned to receive encainide or its placebo (432 to active drug and 425 to placebo) and 641 were assigned to receive flecainide or its placebo (323 to active drug and 318 to placebo). After a mean follow-up of 10 months, 89 patients had died: 59 of arrhythmia (43 receiving drug vs. 16 receiving placebo; P = 0.0004), 22 of nonarrhythmic cardiac causes (17 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo; P = 0.01), and 8 of noncardiac causes (3 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo). Almost all cardiac deaths not due to arrhythmia were attributed to acute myocardial infarction with shock (11 patients receiving drug and 3 receiving placebo) or to chronic congestive heart failure (4 receiving drug and 2 receiving placebo). There were no differences between the patients receiving active drug and those receiving placebo in the incidence of nonlethal disqualifying ventricular tachycardia, proarrhythmia, syncope, need for a permanent pacemaker, congestive heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, angina, or need for coronary-artery bypass grafting or angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: There was an excess of deaths due to arrhythmia and deaths due to shock after acute recurrent myocardial infarction in patients treated with encainide or flecainide. Nonlethal events, however, were equally distributed between the active-drug and placebo groups. The mechanisms underlying the excess mortality during treatment with encainide or flecainide remain unknown.

Spontaneous variability in ventricular ectopic activity during chronic antiarrhythmic therapy.

Previous determinations of variability in frequency of ventricular arrhythmias have been based on repeated recordings obtained in the absence of therapy. We evaluate variability during "effective" treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs. Variability in the percent suppression of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) was determined in 55 patients with chronic arrhythmias who underwent multiple ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings during evaluation of chronic therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs initially determined to be effective, which was defined as 70% or more reduction in total PVC frequency or 90% or more reduction in repetitive forms. During chronic therapy, total PVCs were suppressed by 92%, averaged after a logarithmic transformation step, and repetitive beats were suppressed by 88%. Variability in suppression was substantial. The one-sided 95% confidence intervals required a fall in suppression of total PVCs to 40% or less to exceed limits of spontaneous variability and of repetitive PVCs to 66% or less. Suppression declined at least once during therapy to less than 60% for total PVCs in 24 of 55 patients (44%) and to less than 80% for repetitive PVCs in 13 of 33 patients (39%); nine patients (16%) showed increases in PVC frequency at least once to levels above pretreatment baseline. Seven subgroups were analyzed for their effects on variability and loss of suppression: age, gender, disease etiology, cardiac function, baseline PVC frequency, use of beta-blockers, and class of antiarrhythmic drug. Differences in confidence bounds and loss of suppression were found to be determined in a complex way by subgroup differences in variability and in initial levels of PVC suppression. Variability was greater for patient subgroups with greater PVC frequency, beta-blocker therapy, and non-coronary artery disease. However, clinical loss of suppression was more common only in more elderly patients and those with worse cardiac function. In summary, substantial variability in arrhythmia frequency occurs during effective antiarrhythmic therapy, and the 95% confidence limits of spontaneous variability are broad and determined in a complex way. Careful consideration should be given before concluding on the basis of a single Holter test that changes (increases) in arrhythmia frequency, especially in certain subgroups, are caused by treatment failure.

Relation of baseline characteristics to suppression of ventricular arrhythmias during placebo and active antiarrhythmic therapy in patients after myocardial infarction.

In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS), patients early (6-60 days) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) with ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) of over 10 per hour were randomized to receive, unaware, therapy with one of four antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 402) or placebo (n = 100). Treatment success was defined as 70% or more decrease in VPC rate and 90% or more decrease in VPC runs. If the first active drug was ineffective, a second drug was given. If placebo was ineffective, a second placebo was given. To determine whether or not baseline clinical characteristics predict the response to antiarrhythmic therapy, 10 baseline variables were selected for investigation: age, prior MI, time from CAPS MI to randomization, ejection fraction, baseline VPC frequency, presence of runs (greater than or equal to 3 consecutive VPCs, greater than or equal to 100 beats/min), beta-blocker therapy, digitalis therapy, MI transmurality, and MI location. At the end of the first drug treatment, apparent treatment success in patients receiving placebo was associated on univariate analysis with absence of prior MI, with trends for younger age and Q wave MI, whereas in patients receiving active therapies, higher ejection fraction and younger age were associated with better suppression. In the encainide and flecainide treatments, where the greatest response was observed, absence of prior MI, higher ejection fraction, and younger age were associated with more successful treatment. In a multivariate analysis with these variables, ejection fraction and age remained significant for all active therapies, absence of prior MI and ejection fraction remained significant in the encainide and flecainide treatments, and absence of prior MI in the placebo treatment. Few variables except ejection fraction were associated with VPC suppression during the 1-year follow-up, and only lower ejection fraction and older age related to loss of long-term suppression. Thus, there are only a few independent baseline clinical variables (notably, ejection fraction) that substantially affect antiarrhythmic drug efficacy in suppressing VPCs in patients early after MI. Some variables, however, may be associated with spontaneous arrhythmia variability, leading to an apparent (placebo) response. These findings will be helpful in designing and interpreting treatment studies in patients after MI.

Congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving antiarrhythmic agents for ventricular premature complexes (Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study).

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS) was a randomized, double-blind trial of antiarrhythmic drugs (encainide, flecainide, moricizine, imipramine and placebo) in 502 patients with an ejection fraction greater than 0.20 and at least 10 ventricular premature complexes/hour, 6 to 60 days after acute myocardial infarction. Patients were followed for 1 year and the incidence of new or worsened congestive heart failure (CHF) was evaluated. Heart failure in the 1-year follow-up was gauged by the development (in order of increasing severity) of new symptoms (grade 1), the need for a change in therapy, including addition of digitalis, addition or increase of dose of diuretics or afterload reduction agents or discontinuation of beta-blocking agents (grade 2), or by hospitalization (grade 3). Sixty-one of 502 patients (12%) required hospitalization for CHF in the 1-year follow-up. One hundred five of 403 patients (26%) in the active treatment group and 18 of 99 patients (18%) in the placebo group (difference not significant) developed CHF requiring hospitalization or a change in therapy or both. Although patients with severely impaired ejection fraction were excluded, new or worsened CHF was common in follow-up during CAPS.

Classification of deaths after myocardial infarction as arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic (the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study).

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS) was a randomized, double-blind trial of antiarrhythmic drugs (encainide, flecainide, moricizine, imipramine and placebo) in 502 patients with at least 10 ventricular premature complexes/hour, 6 to 60 days after acute myocardial infarction. CAPS tested the feasibility of performing a larger study to determine if suppression of ventricular ectopic activity after acute myocardial infarction could improve survival. Patients in CAPS were followed for 1 year. All death or cardiac arrest events were evaluated by at least 2 investigators using a classification scheme that characterized the underlying mechanism as cardiac arrhythmic, cardiac nonarrhythmic or noncardiac. Forty-five patients (9%) died or had cardiac arrest during the 1-year follow-up, 29 (64%) within 1 hour from the onset of symptoms and 16 greater than 1 hour from the onset of symptoms. Twenty-three deaths (51%) were classified as arrhythmic, 19 (42%) as nonarrhythmic and 3 (7%) as noncardiac. Acute myocardial ischemia or infarction was associated with the death/cardiac arrest event in 16 patients (36%), 8 in the arrhythmic death group. Discrepancies in classification among reviewers were particularly common in patients with long-standing symptoms of congestive heart failure, in whom it was frequently difficult to identify the precise moment of the onset of symptoms in the death/cardiac arrest event. Using only the temporal relation of symptoms to categorize deaths or cardiac arrests, the mechanism of 12 (27%) of the 45 patients was in disagreement with the classification based on the Events Committee review. Classification of death as sudden or nonsudden is not equivalent to the classification of death as arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic.

Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol to atenolol.

A randomized double-blind multicenter study compared a new oral beta 1-adrenergic antagonist, betaxolol 10 to 40 mg (n = 71), with atenolol 25 to 100 mg (n = 75). Each drug was administered once daily for 24 weeks in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) measurements were taken 24 hours after dosing. Each drug produced significant (p less than 0.01) reductions in mean supine diastolic BP. The mean decrease in supine diastolic BP with betaxolol was significantly greater at weeks 4, 6, 10 and 12 (p less than 0.05). Throughout the remainder of the trial (weeks 14 to 24), no significant differences in BP reduction were noted between treatment groups. Normotension (supine diastolic BP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was achieved in 72% of those given betaxolol compared with 52% of those given atenolol (p less than 0.05). The most common side effects noted were bradycardia, fatigue and headache. The incidence of these and of central nervous system side effects was similar between the betaxolol and atenolol groups. Both agents were well tolerated. At recommended doses, betaxolol once daily may be more effective than atenolol once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.