Risk of hysterectomy and salpingectomy or oophorectomy compared to repair after pelvic gynecologic trauma.

PURPOSE: Pelvic gynecologic trauma (PGT) includes injury to the uterus, ovaries or fallopian tubes. We hypothesized Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 25, hypotension on admission and age ≥ 51 (average age for menopause) would be independent risk factors for resection compared to repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was performed between 2007 and 2015. RESULTS: Of 2,040,235 female patients, 1938 (< 0.1%) presented with PGT with the majority sustaining injury to the ovary or fallopian tubes (52.9%). Most patients were managed nonoperatively (77.1 vs 22.9%). On multivariable analysis, in patients with injury to the uterus, ISS ≥ 25 (OR 3.52, CI 1.67-7.48, p < 0.05) was associated with higher risk for hysterectomy compared to repair. In patients with injury to the ovaries or fallopian tubes, gunshot wound (OR 3.73, CI 1.43-9.68, p < 0.05) was associated with a higher risk for salpingectomy or oophorectomy compared to repair. Age ≥ 51 and hypotension on admission were not independent risk factors for resection in patients with PGT. Operative treatment was associated with a lower risk for mortality in patients with an injury to the uterus (OR 0.27, CI 0.14-0.51, p < 0.001) or ovaries/fallopian tubes (OR 0.37, CI 0.19-0.72, p < 0.001) compared to those managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSION: In the largest study reported, PGT occurred in < 0.1% of traumas involving women. Patients with ISS ≥ 25 have higher risk for hysterectomy compared to repair. Gunshot injuries have higher risk for salpingectomy or oophorectomy compared to repair. Hypotension on arrival or age ≥ 51 are not independent risk factors for resection in PGT. Operative management is associated with lower risk of mortality in PGT patients.

Karyometric image analysis for intraepithelial and invasive cervical lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To derive an objective, numeric measure for the progression of intraepithelial and invasive squamous cell cervical lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Thin-layer cervical cytology preparations from colposcopically confirmed normal cervix, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and carcinoma were identified from a cross-sectional study. Fifty-nine cases representing 4 diagnostic categories were selected, and 2,375 nuclei from epithelial cells representative of the diagnostic category were randomly selected for imaging and measurement from these cases. Additionally, 1,378 visually normal appearing intermediate cells from low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, as well as from carcinoma cases, were identified for analysis. The nuclei were quantitatively characterized, and discriminant analyses were performed to derive a progression curve from normal cytology to carcinoma. RESULTS: The lesion signatures show a clear increase in nuclear abnormality with increasing progression. A progression curve was derived based on mean discriminant function scores for each diagnostic category and on the mean nuclear abnormality values for the nuclei in each category, as expressed by their deviation in feature values from normal reference nuclei. CONCLUSION: A numeric assessment of lesion progression for cervical precancerous and cancerous lesions based on karyometric measurements is possible and may provide an objective, precise characterization of each lesion as well as a basis for improved performance in automated cytology-based cervical cancer screening.

Thin-layer cytology and histopathology in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: To compare thin-layer endometrial cytology to endometrial biopsy and surgical pathology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective study of 103 women. Patients underwent endometrial cytologic evaluation using an endometrial brush, followed by either endometrial biopsy, hysteroscopy with dilation and curettage, or hysterectomy, as clinically indicated. Test performance characteristics and adequacy of cytology and endometrial biopsy were assessed. Ki-67 immunocytochemical expression was evaluated in a random subset of 60 specimens. RESULTS: Cytologic sampling demonstrated a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value of 78% and a negative predictive value of 96% for the detection of endometrial abnormalities. The unsatisfactory rate of uterine cytology was 15% as compared to 26% for endometrial biopsy. Of adenocarcinoma cases, 83% expressed Ki-67, as compared to 30% in benign cases. CONCLUSION: Endometrial cytology may be useful in the detection of endometrial hyperplasia and neoplasia and provides adequate material for the assessment of Ki-67.

Cross-sectional study of patient- and physician-collected cervical cytology and human papillomavirus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of patient- and physician-obtained cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed involving 334 women seen at three colposcopy clinics (Tucson, Arizona; Hermosillo, Mexico; and Lima, Peru). All women used a cytobrush to self-collect specimens for cervical cytology and HPV testing. Subjects subsequently underwent physician collection for cytology and HPV, followed by a complete colposcopic evaluation with directed biopsy. Cytology was processed using thin-layer technology, and HPV was determined using the polymerase chain reaction technique. Test performance characteristics were determined using the histopathologic diagnosis as the reference standard and designating high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as clinically significant disease for the purpose of the analysis. RESULTS: The sensitivity of patient-collected cytology was significantly lower (55.0%) and specificity was significantly better (84.1%) than those of physician-directed sampling (85.2% and 73.4%, respectively). Patient-collected HPV had significantly lower sensitivity (49.0%) than physician sampling (82.2%), although specificity did not significantly differ. CONCLUSION: Patient collection is a feasible although inferior alternative to physician-collected cervical cytology and HPV testing.

Baseline inaccuracy rates for the comparison of cervical biopsy to loop electrosurgical excision histopathologic diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the baseline inaccuracies in histopathologic diagnosis between colposcopically directed cervical biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimens. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was made of cervical biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pairs (n = 448) that were performed at the University of Arizona between 1992 and 2000. Agreement was assessed by kappa statistics and Spearman rho coefficients. Subgroup analysis was performed (n = 139) to assess pairs with significant inaccuracy between biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure, when these were performed within 28 days of each other. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent agreement was found between cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure histopathologic diagnoses, when compared to within 1 degree (kappa, 0.73; P <.0001). A discrepancy that would be attributed to regression or progression was found: mild biopsy (regression, none by definition; progression, 4%), moderate biopsy (regression, 9%; progression, 0%), and severe biopsy (regression, 26%; progression, 0%). CONCLUSION: Even when colposcopically directed cervical biopsy correlates strongly with loop electrosurgical excision procedure histopathologic diagnosis, there is a definable percentage of patients for whom there is a discrepancy between these 2 diagnoses. This discrepancy represents an inherent inaccuracy of the diagnostic testing modality and should not be interpreted as progression or regression of disease.