Measuring step count: why it is important not to assume measures are reliable.

BACKGROUND: The validity and reliability of pedometer software Apps versus the previously investigated spring lever and piezoelectric pedometers is unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity and reliability (in adults aged 18-65) of two pedometer software Apps, the Walk Star and the Accupedo, with spring lever (Digi-Walker CW 700) and piezoelectric (Omron HJ-720ITC and Tanita PD-724) pedometers in the measurement of step count. The criterion for comparison was researcher tallied direct observation of step count using an electronic E3-EHT hand held tally counter. METHODS: Eighteen participants walked for 5minutes on a treadmill at slow (2miles per hour) moderate (3miles per hour) and fast walking (4miles per hour) speeds and on urban streets and upon grass at a perceived "comfortable" walking speed. RESULTS: Bland and Altman plots show wide limits of agreement observed for the Yamax CW 700, Accupedo App and Walk Star App, suggesting these pedometers are unsuitable for measuring step counts in individuals due to high random error (indicating low reliability). Narrow limits of agreement were observed for the Omron HJ-720ITC and the Tanita PD-724 pedometers compared against Tally count and were considered suitable for use. CONCLUSION: The validity and reliability of pedometers cannot be assumed but must be tested and ensured before use in measuring step count.

Development of a functional rehabilitation intervention for post knee arthroplasty patients: COmmunity based Rehabilitation post Knee Arthroplasty (CORKA) trial.

Knee osteoarthritis is a common cause of disability in older people and knee arthroplasty surgery in the UK is increasing. The CORKA trial is a randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation targeted at patients identified as being at risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty. This paper describes the development and delivery of the CORKA intervention. It was informed by current evidence, relevant guidelines, expert and patient opinion, practical considerations and a pilot study. The intervention is a multicomponent rehabilitation programme with the main component being an exercise programme delivered to participants in their own home. It includes functional task practice, strategies to improve adherence and where appropriate the provision of appropriate aids and equipment.

Physiotherapy rehabilitation for osteoporotic vertebral fracture-a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation (PROVE trial).

The trial compared three physiotherapy approaches: manual or exercise therapy compared with a single session of physiotherapy education (SSPT) for people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s). At 1 year, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups meaning there is inadequate evidence to support manual or exercise therapy. INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of different physiotherapy approaches for people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s) (OVF). METHODS: >Prospective, multicentre, adaptive, three-arm randomised controlled trial. Six hundred fifteen adults with back pain, osteoporosis, and at least 1 OVF participated. INTERVENTIONS: 7 individual physiotherapy sessions over 12 weeks focused on either manual therapy or home exercise compared with a single session of physiotherapy education (SSPT). The co-primary outcomes were quality of life and back muscle endurance measured by the QUALEFFO-41 and timed loaded standing (TLS) test at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between groups. Mean QUALEFFO-41: - 1.3 (exercise), - 0.15 (manual), and - 1.2 (SSPT), a mean difference of - 0.2 (95% CI, - 3.2 to 1.6) for exercise and 1.3 (95% CI, - 1.8 to 2.9) for manual therapy. Mean TLS: 9.8 s (exercise), 13.6 s (manual), and 4.2 s (SSPT), a mean increase of 5.8 s (95% CI, - 4.8 to 20.5) for exercise and 9.7 s (95% CI, 0.1 to 24.9) for manual therapy. Exercise provided more quality-adjusted life years than SSPT but was more expensive. At 4 months, significant changes above SSPT occurred in endurance and balance in manual therapy, and in endurance for those ≤ 70 years, in balance, mobility, and walking in exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence was problematic. Benefits at 4 months did not persist and at 12 months, we found no significant differences between treatments. There is inadequate evidence a short physiotherapy intervention of either manual therapy or home exercise provides long-term benefits, but arguably short-term benefits are valuable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 49117867.

Men's experiences of having osteoporosis vertebral fractures: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analyses.

Men and women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis are treated differently by society and health care professionals. This can lead to inequalities in health care and affects how men with fractures view themselves as people. We need to raise awareness that men get these fractures as well as women. INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of research exploring the experience of osteoporosis from the male perspective. This study was undertaken to explore and describe the experiences of men with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis, including their perceptions of diagnosis, treatment and changes in their sense of self. METHODS: The study consists of in-depth semi-structured interviews with nine male participants of the PROVE (Physiotherapy Rehabilitation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture) study. Interviews were digitally audio recorded and fully transcribed. Data were coded in accordance with an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach to analyses. RESULTS: Three main themes are presented. (i) Osteoporosis is considered an old women's disease. (ii) Men are diagnosed and treated differently than women in the NHS. Health care inequalities exist. (iii) Changes in self can occur in men after vertebral fracture/s due to osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Greater awareness that men get this condition is needed in both society in general and also by health care professionals who often do not expect osteoporosis to affect men. Approaches to diagnosis and treatment need to be considered and improved to ensure that they become appropriate and effective for men as well as women.

Reliability and validity of the Four Square Step Test in patients with hip osteoarthritis before and after total hip replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Four Square Step Test (FSST) in assessing gait performance, balance and physical function for patients with hip osteoarthritis before and after total hip replacement (THR). DESIGN: Observational, repeated measures. SETTING: A specialist orthopaedic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight participants with moderate to severe hip osteoarthritis scheduled to receive primary hip replacement within 4 months from recruitment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time to complete the FSST, time and steps to complete the Figure of 8 Walk Test (F8W) and Berg Balance Scale score (BBS). RESULTS: The Bland and Altman limits of agreement for intra-rater measurements of the FSST were -3.2s to 3.5seconds before THR and -1.5 to 2.0seconds after THR. Limits of agreement for two different raters were -2.2 to 3.4seconds, all with small mean differences indicating little bias between raters or replications. Concurrent validity was assessed, and the FSST correlated highly with the F8W (r=0.7, P<0.001) and moderately with the BBS (r=0.6, P<0.001). Only one participant was rated as being at moderate risk of falls on the BBS, with the other participants scoring low; only one participant failed to complete the F8W. This is in contrast to the FSST, which 21 people failed to complete pre-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: The FSST is a valid and reliable measure of multi-directional stepping speed and balance, giving a more informative measure of gait performance than the F8W and BBS, and is feasible for use in a clinical population of patients both before and after THR.

Is the timed loaded standing test a valid measure of back muscle endurance in people with vertebral osteoporosis?

Timed loaded standing (TLS) is a suggested measure of back muscle endurance for people with vertebral osteoporosis. Surface electromyography revealed back muscles work harder and fatigue during TLS. The test end-point and total time were associated with back fatigue. The findings help demonstrate the concurrent validity of the TLS test. INTRODUCTION: The TLS test is suggested as a measure of back muscle endurance for patients with vertebral osteoporosis. However, to date, no study has demonstrated that TLS does measure back extensor or erector spinae (ES) muscle endurance. We used surface electromyography (sEMG) to investigate the performance of the thoracic ES muscles during TLS. METHODS: Thirty-six people with vertebral osteoporosis with a mean age of 71.6 (range 45-86) years participated. sEMG recordings were made of the ES at T3 and T12 bilaterally during quiet standing (QS) and TLS. The relative (%) change in sEMG amplitude between conditions was compared. Fatigue was evaluated by analysing the change in median frequency (MF) of the sEMG signal during TLS, and the correlation between maximal TLS time and rate of MF decline was examined. RESULTS: Activity in the ES increased significantly during TLS at all electrode locations. During TLS, the MF declined at a mean rate of -24.2% per minute (95% C.I. -26.5 to -21.9%). The MF slope and test time were strongly correlated (r2 = 0.71), and at test end, the final MF dropped to an average 89% (95% C.I. 85 to 93%) of initial MF. Twenty-eight participants (78%) reported fatigue was the main reason for stopping, and for eight (22%), it was pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that TLS challenges the ES muscles in the thoracic region and results in ES fatigue. Endurance time and the point at which the TLS test ends are strongly related to ES fatigue.

A qualitative systematic review of patients' experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography.

We aimed to systematically review qualitative studies exploring the experience of living with osteoporosis to develop new conceptual understanding. We identified themes about the invisibility/visibility of osteoporosis, the experience of uncertainty of living with osteoporosis (OP) and living with an ageing body and the place of gender. PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to systematically review the body of qualitative studies exploring the experience of living with either osteoporosis or osteopenia and to use meta-ethnography to develop new conceptual understanding. METHODS: We systematically reviewed and integrated the findings of qualitative research from four bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Psychinfo) to September 2015 in order to increase our conceptual understanding of the lived experience of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Articles were appraised for quality; each was independently read by two researchers to identify concepts which were compared and developed into a conceptual model. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that coming to terms with a diagnosis of osteoporosis is linked to its relative visibility or invisibility. For some, OP has not become manifest and self-identity is intact (biographical integrity). For others, OP is profoundly manifest and self-identity is no long intact (biographical fracture). We also demonstrate that overwhelming uncertainty pervades the experience of OP. Our final theme demonstrates how the experience of OP is set within a cultural context with certain views about ageing and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Our synthesis has highlighted the wealth of qualitative data about osteoporosis and osteopenia. Despite the increasing body of literature on the subject, there remains a need to adjust our interactions with patients. This will allow clinicians to understand how patients can be helped to receive and understand their diagnosis and move forward in partnership with healthcare providers to promote optimal management of the disease.

Protocol for the Femoroacetabular Impingement Trial (FAIT): a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing surgical and non-surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement.

AIMS: Femoroacetabular Junction Impingement (FAI) describes abnormalities in the shape of the femoral head-neck junction, or abnormalities in the orientation of the acetabulum. In the short term, FAI can give rise to pain and disability, and in the long-term it significantly increases the risk of developing osteoarthritis. The Femoroacetabular Impingement Trial (FAIT) aims to determine whether operative or non-operative intervention is more effective at improving symptoms and preventing the development and progression of osteoarthritis. METHODS: FAIT is a multicentre superiority parallel two-arm randomised controlled trial comparing physiotherapy and activity modification with arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of symptomatic FAI. Patients aged 18 to 60 with clinical and radiological evidence of FAI are eligible. Principal exclusion criteria include previous surgery to the index hip, established osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence ≥ 2), hip dysplasia (centre-edge angle < 20°), and completion of a physiotherapy programme targeting FAI within the previous 12 months. Recruitment will take place over 24 months and 120 patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio and followed up for three years. The two primary outcome measures are change in hip outcome score eight months post-randomisation (approximately six-months post-intervention initiation) and change in radiographic minimum joint space width 38 months post-randomisation. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01893034. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:321-7.

Blind outcome assessment: the development and use of procedures to maintain and describe blinding in a pragmatic physiotherapy rehabilitation trial.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To develop trial protocols which promote the achievement of blind outcome assessment. (2) To report outcome assessor beliefs regarding group allocation at follow-up assessments. (3) To document and describe instances of unblinding occurring during the trial to assist and inform rehabilitation researchers and clinicians. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal observational study. SETTING: An NHS Hospital Trust specializing in orthopaedic surgery. SUBJECTS: One hundred and seven patients participating in a prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial investigating physiotherapy rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty, plus three outcome assessors. INTERVENTIONS: A protocol was developed using available research and designed to minimize instances of unblinding during a physiotherapy rehabilitation trial. Administrative, office, patient and research staff procedures were included. MAIN MEASURES: Trial questionnaires measured blind outcome assessment responses at 3 and 12 months post surgery. The outcome assessor kept a field diary recording the events surrounding instances of unblinding. Data underwent descriptive and content analysis. RESULTS: Blind outcome assessment was believed successful for n = 74 (81.32%) assessments at 3-month follow-up, and n = 83 (91.21%) at 12 months. Forty instances (n = 28 participants) of unblinding were described in the field diary. While the main cause of unblinding was participants telling the outcome assessor, in 12.5% of events the assessor drew the wrong conclusion regarding group allocation. Not all unblinding events were remembered at subsequent assessments, even in this relatively small trial. CONCLUSIONS: Blind outcome assessment was considered achievable in this trial. Specific trial protocols enabled blinding beliefs to be reported and instances of unblinding to be described.

Chronic disease management programme in people with severe knee osteoarthritis: efficacy and moderators of response.

AIMS: To establish (1) the efficacy of a six-week chronic disease management programme for knee osteoarthritis and (2) whether previous physiotherapy or being wait listed for surgery moderated the outcome of the programme. DESIGN: A pretest, posttest design with multivariate statistical modelling. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty-one people with severe osteoarthritis who were waiting, or being considered, for surgery. METHODS AND MEASURES: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, arthritis self-efficacy, distress and a patient-rated global indicator of response were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. History of previous physiotherapy, waiting list status, symptom duration, New Zealand disease severity score, radiographic changes and self-perceived need for surgery were recorded at baseline. RESULTS: There were moderate improvements in most outcomes; WOMAC function decreased by 0.29, WOMAC pain by 0.27, pain self-efficacy by 4.4, function self-efficacy by 5.6 and visual analogue scale (VAS) distress by 0.2 (effect sizes ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 at 12 weeks). Waiting list status was a significant modifier for function, pain, distress and self-related outcomes. Participants on the waiting list for surgery experienced lesser improvements. Previous physiotherapy was associated with greater improvements in WOMAC scores at six weeks, but not at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: The chronic disease management programme could be considered for people with severe knee osteoarthritis, but should be given prior to referral and placement on the waiting list for surgery. Previous physiotherapy should not preclude people from participating in a chronic disease management programme.

Does arthroplasty type influence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinal prospective study comparing total and unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Proprioception was assessed after knee replacement to compare total (TKA) to unicompartmental (UKA) knee arthroplasty. Thirty-four patients were recruited; seventeen patients underwent TKA and seventeen patients underwent UKA. The patient's age was similar in both groups. Two measures of proprioception, joint position sense (JPS) and postural sway (PS) were measured. Function was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Measurements were taken pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively on both the operated and contralateral leg. Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or PS were found between groups or between limbs in either group. Post-operatively, both groups had significant improvement of JPS in the operated limb only (20% increase). The improvement in JPS was similar in both groups. PS also improved significantly in both groups although the improvement of PS in the UKA group was twice that for the TKA group. The OKS improved by a similar amount in both groups. Both UKA and TKA result in a significant improvement in proprioception. Dynamic aspects of proprioception improve more after UKA than TKA, which may explain, in part, why UKA patients have superior functional outcome to that of TKA patients.

A systematic review of lateral wedge orthotics--how useful are they in the management of medial compartment osteoarthritis?

Studies on the use of lateral wedge orthotics in the conservative management of medial compartment osteoarthritis are widely quoted. This approach, however, does not consider the disruption of the interaction between lower limb and foot and ankle function that lateral wedges would produce. This comprehensive, systematic review was therefore undertaken to evaluate all available literature to determine whether evidence exists to support their use. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Allied and Complimentary Medicine, PubMed, EBSCO HOST and PEDro, Abstracts of Reviews of Effects in the National Electronic Library for Health for Cochrane Reviews and manual searching were used to identify studies. was searched for trials in progress. Data extraction was performed by the three authors using a paper data extraction form which was based on the CONSORT statement and Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) guidelines. Overall, the results of this review suggest that, based on current evidence there are no major or long-term beneficial effects with the use of lateral wedges.

Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty--a randomised controlled trial.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is appropriate for one in four patients with osteoarthritic knees. This study was performed to compare the safety, effectiveness and economic viability of a new accelerated protocol with current standard care in a state healthcare system. A single blind RCT design was used. Eligible patients were screened for NSAID tolerance, social circumstances and geographical location before allocation to an accelerated recovery group (A) or standard care group (S). Primary outcome was the Oxford Knee Assessment at 6 months post operation, compared using independent Mann-Whitney U-tests. A simple difference in costs incurred was calculated. The study power was sufficient to avoid type 2 errors. Forty-one patients were included. The average stay for Group A was 1.5 days. Group S averaged 4.3 days. No significant difference in outcomes was found between groups. The new protocol achieved cost savings of 27% and significantly reduced hospital bed occupancy. In addition, patient satisfaction was assessed as greater with the accelerated discharge than with the routine discharge time. The strict inclusion criteria meant that 75% of eligible patients were excluded. However, a large percentage of these were due to the distances patients lived from the hospital.

Recovery of function after closed femoral shortening.

This prospective, longitudinal study documents the muscle strength and baseline function of 18 patients undergoing closed femoral shortening for discrepancy in limb length. Patients were studied for two years following surgery. Function was measured by a self-reported questionnaire, timed tests of performance and measurements of muscle strength and power. After two years, the self-reported function and ability to complete timed functional tests had returned to or improved on the pre-operative values. Muscle strength remained slightly below the pre-operative value and was more marked in the quadriceps than the hamstrings. This study suggests that small decreases in muscle strength and power following closed femoral shortening do not adversely affect the patients' ability to perform everyday activities.

Functional recovery in patients with nonunion treated with the Ilizarov technique.

There are few reports on function after limb salvage surgery using the Ilizarov technique, and none that document the pattern of recovery or predict when maximum function returns. This prospective, longitudinal study documents the baseline functional abilities of 40 consecutive patients with nonunion of a fracture in the lower limb. Patients were studied for at least two and a half years following the completion of surgery. Function was measured by timed tests of functional performance and by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score self-reported patient questionnaire. Recovery was slowest in the early stages after removal of the frame and greatest between six months and one year. Statistically significant improvement continued up to, but not beyond two years. This observation has important implications for the length of follow-up incorporated into the rehabilitation programmes for patients, predictions of patient status in regard to compensation and for the design of future studies to evaluate functional outcome.

Loss of knee range of motion in leg lengthening.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors predictive of loss of movement in a cohort of patients undergoing femoral lengthening. BACKGROUND: Loss of joint movement due to poor adaptation of the muscle is a major problem during limb lengthening but remains poorly documented in the literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A validated technique using a modified goniometer was used to measure knee motion. Measurements were taken before surgery, prelengthening, during lengthening, and at 6 and 12 months post frame removal. The subjects were 35 patients with a mean age of 22 years (+/-12.8 years), 23 men and 12 women, undergoing femoral lengthening by the Ilizarov method. RESULTS: The pattern of recovery of knee range of movement that was observed showed that 88% of knee flexion was regained by 6 months, 92% of patients regained their knee flexion by 12 months, and 97% by 18 months. Significant loss of knee flexion occurred in the latent period prior to lengthening, mean loss 79 degrees (+/-22.8 degrees). All patients regained full knee extension by the end of lengthening, but 2 patients who had fixed flexion deformities of > 40 degrees developed posterior subluxation of the knee. CONCLUSIONS: The unexpected loss of movement observed in the prelengthening period indicates that physical therapy efforts must be directed to this phase in order to accelerate the recovery of joint range and reduce the muscle-related complications that can occur during limb lengthening.

Repeatability of goniometer measurements of the knee in patients wearing an Ilizarov external fixator: a clinic-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of three different methods of measurement of knee range of motion in patients undergoing limb reconstruction with the Ilizarov external fixator. DESIGN: Twenty-five patients had the passive range of motion of their knee measured by 13 physiotherapists who were experienced in the use of goniometry. The testers were assigned into random pairs, each tester measured three or four patients who were allocated to them using the three different methods. These were: (1) a universal goniometer aligned against anatomical landmarks, (2) a universal goniometer aligned against the Ilizarov frame and (3) a modified universal goniometer. SETTING: Orthopaedic limb reconstruction outpatient clinics. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five patients undergoing limb reconstruction using an Ilizarov external fixator on both the femur and tibia. RESULTS: Comparison of the three different goniometry methods showed that using a modified goniometer there was enhanced reliability compared with other methods. This method demonstrated good repeatability for both intra-tester and inter-tester measurements. CONCLUSIONS: When serial measurements of knee range of motion are taken in patients wearing an Ilizarov external fixator the modified model of goniometer should be used.

Reducing the biomechanical stress of lifting by training.

The effectiveness of two methods of training in reducing biomechanical stress during lifting was examined in a sample of 12 men aged 18-40 years. Subjects carried out three 40 min sessions, one session per day, of a simple symmetrical lifting task. No training was given before the first session, which acted as the control condition. before each of the next two sessions training was given in the form of either written guidelines or interactive personal tuition in a crossover design. Interaction of order with method was expected and was of interest. The effectiveness of each training method in relieving the stress of lifting was measured in four ways: by ratings of perceived exertion on the Borg scale; by video analysis of adherence to guideline kinematics; by chronic spinal compression measured by precision stadiometry; and by the relative compression force at L5/S1 calculated using Chaffin's model. Although the differences in the results of the four assessment methods make reservations necessary it is suggested that while brief personal tuition may demonstrably reduce lifting stress even in a simple lifting task, written guidelines for the untrained may be counterproductive and may interfere with habitual skills. It is recommended that the efficiency of lifting training methods be estimated objectively, such as by the methods employed here, before being adopted.