Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 23(11): 872-880, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35876384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the interplay between individual and organizational factors on moral distress in PICUs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, article-based survey administered between June and August 2017. SETTING: Twenty-three Italian PICUs. SUBJECTS: Of 874 eligible clinicians, 635 responded to the survey (75% response rate), and 612 correctly completed the survey. Clinicians were 74% female; 66% nurses and 34% physicians; and 51% had between 6 and 20 years of experience from graduation. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinicians completed the "Italian Moral Distress Scale-Revised," the "Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale," and a sociodemographic questionnaire inquiring about sex, profession, years of experience, and spiritual/religious belief. PICU organizational characteristics were also collected (e.g., number of admissions, mortality rate, nurse-patient ratio, presence of parents in PICU, presence of parents during physical examination). To identify individual predictors of moral distress, we used stepwise linear regression. To determine the impact of organizational factors on moral distress, we used analysis of covariance, controlling for those individual factors that emerged as significant in the regression model. Moral distress was associated with being a nurse (B = -0.094; p < 0.05) and not having spiritual/religious belief (B = 0.130; p < 0.01), but not with resilience. Clinicians working in PICUs with a medium number of admissions per year (between 264 and 468), a lower nurse:patient ratio (1:3), and where parents' presence during physical examination were never allowed experienced higher moral distress even controlling for profession and spiritual/religious belief. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational factors (medium number of admissions, lower nurse:patient ratio, and parental exclusion from physical examination) played a stronger role than individual factors in increasing moral distress. To decrease moral distress, attention should be paid also to organizational aspects.


Subject(s)
Morals , Physicians , Humans , Female , Male , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Stress, Psychological , Job Satisfaction , Attitude of Health Personnel
3.
Crit Care Med ; 45(3): 430-437, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27930369

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Moral distress is a common experience among critical care professionals, leading to frustration, withdrawal from patient care, and job abandonment. Most of the studies on moral distress have used the Moral Distress Scale or its revised version (Moral Distress Scale-Revised). However, these scales have never been validated through factor analysis. This article aims to explore the factorial structure of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised and develop a valid and reliable scale through factor analysis. DESIGN: Validation study using a survey design. SETTING: Eight medical-surgical ICUs in the north of Italy. SUBJECTS: A total of 184 clinicians (64 physicians, 94 nurses, and 14 residents). INTERVENTIONS: The Moral Distress Scale-Revised was translated into Italian and administered along with a measure of depression (Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition) to establish convergent validity. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to explore the Moral Distress Scale-Revised factorial structure. Items with low (less than or equal to 0.350) or multiple saturations were removed. The resulting model was tested through confirmatory factor analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Italian Moral Distress Scale-Revised is composed of 14 items referring to four factors: futile care, poor teamwork, deceptive communication, and ethical misconduct. This model accounts for 59% of the total variance and presents a good fit with the data (root mean square error of approximation = 0.06; comparative fit index = 0.95; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.94; weighted root mean square residual = 0.65). The Italian Moral Distress Scale-Revised evinces good reliability (α = 0.81) and moderately correlates with Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (r = 0.293; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the moral distress total score between physicians and nurses. However, nurses scored higher on futile care than physicians (t = 2.051; p = 0.042), whereas physicians scored higher on deceptive communication than nurses (t = 3.617; p < 0.001). Moral distress was higher for those clinicians considering to give up their position (t = 2.778; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The Italian Moral Distress Scale-Revised is a valid and reliable instrument to assess moral distress among critical care clinicians and develop tailored interventions addressing its different components. Further research could test the generalizability of its factorial structure in other cultures.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Medical Futility/psychology , Morals , Nurses/psychology , Physicians/psychology , Professional Misconduct/psychology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Adult , Deception , Ethics, Medical , Ethics, Nursing , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Group Processes , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Italy , Male , Medical Futility/ethics , Middle Aged , Physicians/ethics , Professional Misconduct/ethics , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics
4.
Front Psychol ; 7: 1991, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28066307

ABSTRACT

Introduction: It is important for HIV positive patients to be engaged in their care and be adherent to treatment in order to reduce disease progression and mortality. Studies found that illness representations influence adherence through the mediating role of coping behaviors. However, no study has ever tested if patient engagement to the visits mediate the relationship between illness perceptions and adherence. This study aimed to explore illness representations of HIV positive patients and test the hypothesis that illness representations predict adherence through the mediating role of a component of behavioral engagement. Methods: HIV-positive patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for at least one year and presenting to a check-up visit were eligible to participate in the study. Patients completed the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised. Behavioral engagement was measured based on the patients' clinical attendance to the check-up visits; adherence to HAART was measured by viral load. Undetectable viral load or HIV-RNA < 40 copies/ml were considered indexes of virologic success. Results: A total of 161 patients participated in the study. Most of them coherently attributed the experienced symptoms to HIV/HAART; perceived their condition as chronic, stable, coherent, judged the therapy as effective, and attributed their disease to the HIV virus and to their behavior or bad luck. The majority of patients (80.1%) regularly attended check-up visits and 88.5% of them reached virologic success. The mediation model did not show good fit indexes. However, a significant direct effect of two independent variables on virologic success was found. Specifically, the perception that the disease does not have serious consequences on patient's life and the prevalence of negative emotions toward HIV were associated with virologic success. On the contrary, the patient's perception that the disease has serious consequences on his/her life and the prevalence of positive emotions were associated with virologic failure. This model showed good fit indexes (CFI = 1; TLI = 1; RMSEA = 0.00; and WRMSR = 0.309). Discussion: Results do not support the mediating role of behavioral engagement in the relationship between illness representations and adherence. As perception of serious consequences coupled with positive emotions are directly associated with virologic failure, clinicians should take them into account to promote treatment adherence.

5.
Scand J Occup Ther ; 23(1): 50-6, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26094692

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increasing amount of literature has studied changes in communication skills in medical and nursing undergraduate students. AIM: To evaluate whether occupational therapists' communication behaviours change with experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 participants (second-year OT students, final-year OT students, professional OTs) were enrolled and met three simulated clients. The role plays were video-recorded and analysed through OT-RIAS (Occupational Therapy-Roter Interaction Analysis System). Chi-square tests were used to analyse the statistical differences between groups for the OT-RIAS categories. RESULTS: Process represented 30.74% of communication for second-year students, 33.69% for final year students, and 35.58% for professional OTs; Occupational therapy ranged from 30.41% in the second-year students to 32.54% in the undergraduates and 37.04% in the professional OTs; Medical increased from 18.66% to 34.33% of the final-year students and 47.01% of the professional therapists. Personal and Psychosocial slightly decreased through experience. Emotional decreased gradually: 39.8% in the second-year students, 29.54% in final-year students, and 30.66% in professional OTs. CONCLUSION: During training in occupational therapy the communication skills changed, assuming a more technical shape, increasing control and content-related OT communication. Nevertheless, the therapists' communication behaviours showed the endurance of attention to the client's point of view.


Subject(s)
Communication , Simulation Training/methods , Students, Health Occupations , Adult , Attitude to Health , Female , Humans , Male , Occupational Therapy/education , Patient-Centered Care , Professional-Patient Relations , Students, Health Occupations/psychology , Video Recording/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...