The perioperative specialist practitioner: developing and evaluating a new surgical role.

INTRODUCTION: This paper describes the design, implementation and evaluation of a new professional role in surgery. The role of the perioperative specialist practitioner (PSP), conceived as a response to the Working Time Directive, provides integrated preoperative and postoperative care to patients undergoing surgery in hospital. METHODS: A 1-year training programme was designed, dealing with a wide range of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Effective communication was a key component. Nine intensive 5-day modules at Imperial College London (London, UK) alternated with supervised experience of the surgical team at each participant's home trust. Detailed evaluation of the role and the training programme was provided by an independent research team, using an interview-based qualitative approach. Observational data were provided by the project team. Data were analysed using standard qualitative methods. RESULTS: 27 PSPs across 12 National Health Service trusts took part in two PSP training programmes. A total of 124 interviews (94 individual and 30 group) were carried out with PSPs and their colleagues. Overall, the role was seen as successful and positive, with great potential for dealing with reductions in junior medical cover. Each site encountered different opportunities and problems. Lack of mentorship was a key issue, and the role provoked considerable opposition in trusts. The training programme was viewed as highly successful. DISCUSSION: PSPs can provide high levels of expertise, but within clear limits. Our training programme has been effective and is perceived to be of high quality. However, introducing a new role requires time and sensitivity if opposition is to be minimised.

Innovative training for new surgical roles--the place of evaluation.

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the central role of 'external' evaluation, provided by an independent researcher, in developing an innovative curriculum for new professional roles with surgery. Workforce changes affecting the National Health Service provided an opportunity to develop 2 new roles and design training programmes to support them. The perioperative specialist practitioner (PSP) role was designed from scratch, while surgical care practitioner (SCP) training built on existing practice. Training programmes combined formal modules at Imperial College London (approximately 48 days over 10 months) with supervised clinical practice in each participant's base hospital. Programmes balanced factual knowledge, clinical and communication skills, professional issues and personal development and used a range of innovative techniques. EVALUATION METHODS: A qualitative approach based on a utilisation-focused model monitored the development and implementation of 4 pilot PSP and SCP training programmes. A total of 124 individual and 48 group interviews were conducted at intervals over 3 years, sampling course participants, the project team clinical supervisors and administrators. An independent researcher collected, analysed and presented data at key stages, feeding back findings to the project team as the programmes evolved. DISCUSSION: Effective training programmes for new roles can be developed, but the process is time-consuming and requires sensitivity. An independent evaluator offers great benefits, modulating the collaborative partnership between participants and project team. Positive responses (relating to content and teaching methods) from our study enabled us to refine a learner-centred programme. Negative responses often demanded immediate action to address important concerns, and evaluation provided early warning. External evaluation provides a vital perspective in the development of curricula supporting new roles.