Who's in charge of children's environmental health at school?

Children spend many hours each week in and around school buildings. Their short- and long-term health outcomes and ability to learn are affected by numerous environmental factors related to the school buildings, the school grounds, the school transportation system, and the use of various products and materials in and around the school. Many school buildings are old, and they-and even newer buildings-can contain multiple environmental health hazards. While some districts self-report they have environmental health policies in place, no independent verification of these policies or their quality exists. Teachers and other staff, but not children who are more vulnerable to hazards than adults, are afforded some protections from hazards by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, by their employment contracts, or through adult occupational health services. Major environmental problems include: indoor air quality, lighting, pests and pesticides, heavy metals and chemical management issues, renovation of occupied buildings, noise, and cleaning processes and products. No agency at the federal or state levels is charged with ensuring children's health and safety in and around school buildings. No systematic means exists for collecting data about exposures which occur in the school setting. Recommendations are made for dealing with issues of data collection, federal actions, state and local actions, and for building the capacity of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-designated and funded Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Units (PEHSU) in responding to and evaluating risks to children's environmental health in schools.

Science-based recommendations to prevent or reduce potential exposure to biological, chemical, and physical agents in schools.

The U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) documented generally poor conditions of school facilities in the early 1990s. Previous papers examined, for time intervals ending before 2002, relationships between education facility indoor air and environmental quality (IEQ), including adequate ventilation, and occupant health and productivity. Research on IEQ related specifically to new or refurbished traditional school construction, or portable classrooms, is limited. A review of school IEQ literature through fall 2003 was conducted. Then, acknowledging the limited resources and competing priorities facing American schools, practical science-based, best practices recommendations to promote IEQ and hence prevent or reduce potential occupant exposure to biological, chemical, and physical agents of concern were proposed. Electronic search engines, conference proceedings, the Internet, and reference lists of peer-reviewed papers and reports were used. Eighteen best practices based on scientific references are presented.

Angular gyrus syndrome mimicking depressive pseudodementia.

A 67-year-old left-handed woman with a diagnosis of pseudodementia was being treated for depression with little benefit. Neuropsychological evaluations revealed features of angular gyrus syndrome, namely, agraphia, alexia, Gerstmann's syndrome and behavioural manifestations such as depression, poor memory, frustration and irritability. A computed tomographic scan showed a right occipito-temporal infarction, which had occurred 18 months earlier. The patient demonstrated aspects of language dysfunction associated with the syndrome and showed reversed lateralization of cerebral functions. Recognizing and distinguishing between angular gyrus syndrome and depression is important because the appropriate therapies differ. The use of the term pseudodementia can be misleading.

Rescue high frequency oscillation and predictors of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: High frequency oscillation (HFO) is now frequently used as rescue support, but it has been suggested that as many as one-third of survivors have abnormal neurodevelopmental findings at follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 and 2 years in very prematurely born patients, who, because of severe neonatal respiratory failure, had required transfer to high frequency oscillation (HFO). METHODS: A case control study was performed. Controls were supported by conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) only and matched to HFO infants for gestational age. At 1 and 2 years, neurodevelopmental status was assessed in both groups. Abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome was diagnosed if infants had impairment with or without disability or a Griffiths developmental quotient of at least two standard deviations below the mean. PATIENTS: Fifty-six infants were studied, median gestation age of 28 weeks (range 23--31). RESULTS: At 2 years of age, a greater proportion of the HFO infants compared to the controls had an abnormal outcome (p<0.05). HFO infants with an abnormal outcome compared to those with a normal outcome had poorer oxygenation prior to transfer to HFO (p=0.05), but did not have a lower initial improvement in oxygenation or longer duration of hypocarbia on HFO. Logistic regression demonstrated adverse outcomes significantly related to HFO use and gestational age in the whole study population and to gestational age in the HFO infants. CONCLUSION: An initial response to HFO does not guarantee normal neurodevelopmental outcome. Rescue HFO in very immature infants should be used cautiously.