Effectiveness of school-based behavioural interventions to improve children's oral health by reducing sugar intake and promoting oral hygiene: A rapid review of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence of the effectiveness of school-based behavioural interventions to improve the oral health of children aged 3-18 years in a rapid review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Three independent reviewers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and other sources between January 2000 and December 2020 for eligible published and unpublished studies in English and extracted data. Primary outcomes were caries increment, plaque levels, gingival health, reported frequency and/or amount of free sugars intake and oral hygiene behaviour. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. RESULTS: Eight cluster RCTs met the inclusion criteria and had substantial heterogeneity. Three trials assessed caries increment and one found significant reductions in the intervention group. Another trial found similar benefits, but these were limited to children from high socioeconomic groups. The third trial found an increase in dental caries in the intervention group. Three studies reported significant reductions in plaque scores and improvements in gingival health with modest effects. Interventions delivered by peers (at adolescence) or with parents' involvement (at pre-adolescence) showed significant reductions in plaque scores compared to those delivered by dentists or teachers only. Most interventions showed significant improvements in self-reported behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence of clinical benefit to dental health from school-based behavioural interventions. There is a need to conduct well-designed trials of behavioural interventions that are theory-derived and include environmental elements (e.g. supervised toothbrushing). Future trials would benefit from cost-effectiveness analysis and assessment of interventions' effect on oral health inequalities amongst children.

The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.

The aim of this in vivo study was to test the diagnostic accuracy of a pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen) device in detecting approximal caries lesions, in posterior permanent teeth, at the cavitation and non-cavitation thresholds, and compare it with that of digital bitewing radiography. Thirty patients (aged 18-37), who attended the Faculty of Dentistry at Damascus University for a dental examination, were consecutively screened. Ninety approximal surfaces of posterior permanent teeth without frank cavitations, enamel hypoplasia or restorations were selected and examined using the LFpen (DIAGNOdent pen) and digital bitewing radiography. The reference standard was the visual-tactile inspection, after performing temporary tooth separation, using orthodontic rubber rings, placed for 7 days. The status of included approximal surfaces was recorded as intact/sound, with white/brown spots or cavitated. One trained examiner performed all examinations. There were statistically significant differences in LFpen readings between the three types of approximal surface status (P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off values for detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth were >16 and 8 at the cavitation and non-cavitation thresholds respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (measured by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve) were 100, 85 and 95 and 92, 90 and 95% at the cavitation and non-cavitation thresholds respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficient for intra-examiner reliability was 0.95. The diagnostic accuracy of the LFpen was significantly higher than that of digital bitewing radiography (P < 0.001). The LFpen's diagnostic performance was accurate and significantly better than digital bitewing radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions, in posterior permanent teeth.