Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
HNO ; 53(7): 655-60, 2005 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15565423

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 1-2/1,000 newborns are affected by connatal permanent hearing impairment. Clinical diagnosis is often delayed. This demands newborn hearing screening (NHS). Some questions regarding the optimal method remain unsolved. METHODS: The newborns in the obstetrical department (low-risk group) are tested by automated transitory evoked otoacustic emissions (TEOAE). TEOAE-fail is followed by automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) examination. All sick newborns admitted to the pediatric department (high-risk group) are primarily tested using AABR. Pathological AABR-testing leads to pedaudiological diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: In the low-risk group, 82 out of 1,584 newborns failed TEOAE-testing (recall 5.18%). Only 5 of these patients failed consecutive AABR examination (recall 0.32%). Permanent hearing loss was finally confirmed in 3 children (0.13%). 10 out of 755 newborns in the high-risk group failed AABR-testing (1.32%). In 6 of these children, hearing loss was confirmed (0.79%). CONCLUSION: A two-tier screening process as described is able to reduce recall rate, overall expenses and parental anxiety.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Evoked Response , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Screening/organization & administration , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases/diagnosis , Male , Patient Care Team , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...