Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
South Med J ; 115(10): 745-751, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe, using a statewide trauma registry, the incidence, trends, and injuries for tree stand falls while deer hunting in Pennsylvania. METHODS: Falls from tree stands were abstracted from the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation registry (1990-2017) and combined with the number of licensed deer hunters, deer hunting days, and deer hunting-related shooting incidents (HRSIs) provided by the Pennsylvania Game Commission to calculate tree stand fall and HRSI rates (per 1 million deer hunting days) and age-group specific fall rates (per 100,000 licensed deer hunters). Poisson regression was used to assess the significance of the annual and age group rate trends (significance P < 0.05). Case fatality rate (percentage of number of deaths per number of injured hunters) also was calculated. RESULTS: There were 1229 victims of tree stand falls and 560 victims of HRSIs between 1990 and 2017. Fall rates increased from 1.5 to 10.4 (P < 0.0001), and HRSI rates decreased from 4.9 to 1.2 (P = 0.001). Fall rates surpassed HRSI rates in 1999 and increased with advancing age (P = 0.007), peaking at 7.2 for hunters aged 50 to 59 years. Most (77%) injured hunters sustained multiple injuries. The case fatality rate was only 0.8%, but 26% of the injured hunters had a dependent functional limitation at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Tree stand falls are now the leading cause of Pennsylvania deer hunting accidents. Fall victims usually sustain multiple nonfatal but often disabling injuries. Study findings support the need for surveillance of these accidents and additional tree stand safety education.


Subject(s)
Deer , Trees , Animals , Humans , Hunting , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Recreation
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35764376

ABSTRACT

We report an 80-year-old woman who developed severe hypophosphataemia and elevated urinary phosphate levels while started on valproic acid. This occurred within 1-2 days of starting valproic acid. There are rare single-patient reports of the association of valproic acid with adult Fanconi syndrome. This generally occurs after long-term exposure to valproate. This is the first reported experience of Fanconi's syndrome in an adult with acute exposure to valproic acid. Clinicians should be aware of the possible association.

3.
Am Surg ; 83(11): 1203-1208, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29183520

ABSTRACT

Elderly patients are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality after trauma, which is reflected through higher frailty indices. Data collection using existing frailty indices is often not possible because of brain injury, dementia, or inability to communicate with the patient. Sarcopenia is a reliable objective measure for frailty that can be readily assessed in CT imaging. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of sarcopenia on the outcomes of geriatric blunt trauma patients. Left psoas area (LPA) was measured at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on the axial CT images. LPA was normalized for height (LPA mm2/m2) and after stratification by gender, sarcopenia was defined as LPA measurements in the lowest quartile. A total of 1175 patients consisting of 597 males and 578 females were studied. LPAs below 242.6 mm2/m2 in males and below 187.8 mm2/m2 in females were considered to be sarcopenic. We found sarcopenia in 149 males and 145 females. In multivariate analysis, sarcopenia was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.56) and a higher risk of discharge to less favorable destinations (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.05-1.97). Lastly, sarcopenic patients had an increased risk of prolonged hospitalization (hazard ratio: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.04-1.40).


Subject(s)
Sarcopenia/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Psoas Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Risk Factors , Sarcopenia/diagnostic imaging , Sarcopenia/mortality , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Severity Indices , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality
4.
Am Surg ; 83(1): 39-44, 2017 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28234124

ABSTRACT

Urban areas house the majority of the population in the United States but trauma deaths occur more commonly in rural areas. In this study, we aimed to investigate if direct patient admission to a Level I trauma center improves outcomes in rural trauma. We retrospectively reviewed data in our trauma database from January 2008 to the end of December 2012 to compare the overall outcomes between direct admissions (DAs) and interhospital transfers (IHTs). Of the 6118 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 59.5 per cent were in the DA group and 40.5 per cent in the IHT group. Injury severity score was similar between the two groups but severe traumatic brain injury was more common (P = 0.001) in the DA group. Hospital length of stay, complication rate, and in-hospital mortality were not different between the two groups (all P> 0.2). In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in survival between the two modes of admission (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.91, 0.69-1.20, P = 0.51). We concluded that rural trauma IHTs had no detrimental impact on the outcome. Prospective studies would better elucidate factors associated with patient outcomes in rural trauma.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adult , Aged , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
5.
Am J Surg ; 213(2): 399-404, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27575601

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The majority of the US population live in urban areas, yet more than half of all trauma deaths occur in rural areas. The Rural Trauma Team Development Course (RTTDC) is developed to improve the outcomes of rural trauma and we aimed to study its effect on patient transfer. METHODS: Trauma referrals 2 years before the RTTDC training were compared with referrals 2 years after the course. RESULTS: Of the 276 studied patients, 97 were referred before the RTTDC training and 179 patients were referred after the course. Transfer acceptance time was significantly shorter after the RTTDC training (139.2 ± 87.1 vs 110 ± 66.3 min, P = .003). The overall transfer time was also significantly reduced following the RTTDC training (257.4 ± 110.8 vs 219.2 ± 86.5 min, P = .002). Patients receiving pretransfer imaging had a significantly higher transfer time both before and after RTTDC training (all Ps < .01). Mortality was nearly halved (6.2% vs 3.4%) after the RTTDC training. CONCLUSION: The RTTDC training was associated with reduced transfer acceptance time and reduced transfer time.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Traumatology/education , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Diagnostic Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population , Time Factors , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 27(7): 1677-1680, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27391655

ABSTRACT

Facial fractures are commonly managed nonoperatively. Patients with facial fractures involving sinus cavities commonly receive 7 to 10 days of prophylactic antibiotics, yet no literature exists to support or refute this practice. The aim of this study was to compare the administration and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of soft tissue infection in nonoperative facial fractures. A total number of 289 patients who were admitted to our level I trauma center with nonoperative facial fractures from the beginning of 2012 to the end of 2014 were studied. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: no antibiotic prophylaxis, short-term antibiotic prophylaxis (1-5 days), and long-term antibiotic prophylaxis (>5 days). The primary outcome was the incidence of facial soft tissue infection and Clostridium difficile colitis. Fifty patients received no antibiotic prophylaxis. Sixty-three patients completed a short course of antibiotic prophylaxis and 176 patients received long-term antibiotics. Ampicillin/sulbactam, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, or a combination of both were used in 216 patients. Twenty-three patients received clindamycin due to penicillin allergy. Short and long courses of antibiotic prophylaxis were administered more commonly in patients with concomitant maxillary and orbital fractures (P <0.0001). No mortality was found in any group. Soft tissue infection was not identified in any patient. C. difficile colitis was identified in 1 patient who had received a long course of antibiotic prophylaxis (P = 0.7246). There was no difference in the outcome of patients receiving short-term, long-term, and no antibiotic prophylaxis. Prospective randomized studies are needed to provide further clinical recommendations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Facial Injuries/complications , Skull Fractures/complications , Soft Tissue Infections/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Soft Tissue Infections/etiology
7.
Orthopedics ; 35(3): e319-24, 2012 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22385440

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the acute outcomes and mortality rates of an Advanced Trauma Life Support guideline approach for managing hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries. We retrospectively reviewed the acute outcomes of 48 consecutive patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Patients underwent treatment via the advanced trauma life support protocol, with primary angiography based on trauma surgeon preference. Mean patient age was 51.2 years, with a mean injury severity score of 43.2±14.3. Mean systolic blood pressure was 74.8±16.1 mm Hg at presentation. Patients received an average of 7.0±6.6 units of red blood cells and 4.2±2.3 units of fresh frozen plasma in the first 6 hours. Fourteen patients underwent emergent angiography, and 12 patients were treated with embolization. Mean time to angiography was 3 hours and 55 minutes (range, 2-19 hours). Twenty patients died during hospitalization, with an overall mortality rate of 41.7%; 13 (27.1%) of them died within 24 hours. Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines with angiography are not adequate for the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries and result in unacceptably high mortality rates compared with more specific approaches using transfusion protocols and interventions, such as pelvic packing.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/mortality , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Life Support Care/standards , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Shock, Hemorrhagic/mortality , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Traumatology/standards , Angiography , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Life Support Care/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...