Acute heart failure in the elderly: setting related differences in clinical features and management.

BACKGROUND: Administrative data show that acute heart failure (HF) patients are older than those enrolled in clinical registries and frequently admitted to non-cardiological settings of care. The purpose of this study was to describe clinical characteristics of old patients hospitalised for acute HF in Cardiology, Internal Medicine or Geriatrics wards. METHODS: Data came from ATHENA (AcuTe Heart failurE in advaNced Age) registry which included elderly patients (≥ 65 years) admitted to the above mentioned settings of care from December 1, 2014 to December 1, 2015. RESULTS: We enrolled 396 patients, 15.4% assigned to Cardiology, 69.7% to Internal Medicine, and 14.9% to a Geriatrics ward. Mean age was 83.5 ± 7.6 years (51.8% of patients ≥ 85 years) and was higher in patients admitted to Geriatrics (P < 0.001); more than half were females. Medical treatments did not differ significantly among settings of care (in a context of a low prescription rate of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors) whereas significant differences were observed in comorbidity patterns and management guidelines recommendation adherence for decongestion evaluation with comparison of weight and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels on admission and at discharge (both P = 0.035 and P < 0.001), echocardiographic evaluation ( P < 0.001) and follow-up visits planning ( P < 0.001), all higher in Cardiology. Mean in-hospital length of stay was 9 ± 5.9 days, significantly higher in Geriatrics (13.7 ± 6.5 days) and Cardiology (9.9 ± 6.7 days) compared to Internal Medicine (8 ± 5.2 days), P < 0.001. In-hospital mortality was 9.3%, resulting higher in Geriatrics (18.6%) and Cardiology (16.4%) than Internal Medicine (5.8%), P = 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients hospitalised for acute HF, clinical characteristics and management differ significantly according to the setting of admission.

Pre-operative physical performance as a predictor of in-hospital outcomes in older patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Risk stratification of cardiac surgery patients is usually based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score, that has limited predictive value in older persons. We aimed assessing whether the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) improves, beyond the STS score, assessment of hospital prognosis in older patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. METHODS: All patients aged 75+ years referred for elective cardiac surgery to Careggi University Hospital (Florence, Italy) from April 2013 to March 2017 were evaluated pre-operatively. Participants were classified according to the STS-Predicted Risk Of Mortality (STS-PROM): low (<4%), intermediate (4 to 8%), and high risk (>8%). Primary study outcomes were hospital mortality and STS-defined major morbidity. Length of hospital stay was an additional outcome. RESULTS: Out of 235 participants (females: 46.5%; mean age: 79.6 years), 144 (61.3%) were at low, 67 (28.5%) at intermediate and 24 (10.2%) at high risk, based on the STS-PROM. SPPB (mean±SEM) was 8.8 ± 0.2, 7.0 ± 0.5, and 6.0 ± 0.8 in participants at low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively (p<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 62 participants (26.4%). In low-risk participants, the SPPB score predicted the primary endpoint (adjusted OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89 per each point increase; p<0.001) controlling for STS-Major Morbidity or Operative Mortality (STS-MM) score. This result was not observed in the intermediate-high risk group. CONCLUSIONS: SPPB predicts mortality and major morbidity in older patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, classified as low risk with the STS risk score. The SPPB, applied preoperatively, might improve risk stratification in older patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

Role of Frailty on Risk Stratification in Cardiac Surgery and Procedures.

The number of older people candidates for interventional cardiology, such as PCI but especially for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) , would increase in the future. Generically, the surgical risk, the amount of complications in the perioperative period, mortality and severe disability remain significantly higher in the elderly than in younger. For this reason it's important to determine the indication for surgical intervention, using tools able to predict not only the classics outcome (length of stay, mortality), but also those more specifically geriatrics, correlate to frailty: delirium, cognitive deterioration, risk of institutionalization and decline in functional status. The majority of the most used surgical risks scores are often specialist-oriented and many variables are not considered. The need of a multidimensional diagnostic process, focused on detect frailty, in order to program a coordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long term follow up, led to the development of a specific geriatric tool: the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The CGA has the aim to improve the prognostic ability of the current risk scores to capture short long term mortality and disability, and helping to resolve a crucial issue providing solid clinical indications to help physician in the definition of on interventional approach as futile. This tool will likely optimize the selection of TAVI older candidates could have the maximal benefit from the procedure.

Cardiac surgery in the elderly: What goals of care?

At present, the majority of cardiac surgery interventions have been performed in the elderly with successful short-term mortality and morbidity, however significant difficulties must to be underlined about our capacity to predict long-term outcomes such as disability, worsening quality of life and loss of functional capacity.The reason probably resides on inability to capture preoperative frailty phenotype with current cardiac surgery risk scores and consequently we are unable to outline the postoperative trajectory of an important patients' centered outcome such as disability free survival. In this perspective, more than one geriatric statements have stressed the systematic underuse of patient reported outcomes in cardiovascular trials even after taking account of their relevance to older feel and wishes. Thus, in the next future is mandatory for geriatric cardiology community closes this gap of evidences through planning of trials in which patients' centered outcomes are considered as primary goals of therapies as well as cardiovascular ones.