Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Rev Infirm ; 70(275): 35-36, 2021 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34752359

ABSTRACT

The return back home of certain patients treated for cancer in the palliative phase requires efficient coordination of caregivers in order to guarantee the well-being of patients and the quality and safety of the care provided. Two hospital coordination nurses have developed a quality approach that aims to reinforce the security of technical care at home in a perfect coordination of all the city-hospital contributors.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Neoplasms , Hospitals , Humans , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care
2.
Rev Infirm ; 70(274): 40-41, 2021 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34565537

ABSTRACT

An evaluation of professional practices was carried out in a cancer centre in the wake of the management of the health crisis linked to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Hospital teams questioned the relevance of the measures adopted, internally and during home care, to manage suspected or confirmed Covid-19 patients and prevent contagion for all.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Home Care Services , Humans , Pandemics , Professional Practice , SARS-CoV-2
3.
PLoS One ; 9(10): e109320, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25303180

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to study the relationships between educational level, women's knowledge about cervical cancer (CC), and acceptance of HPV vaccination for their daughters. METHODS: We analysed data from a quantitative (self-administrated questionnaire) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews) cross-sectional study performed in 2008 among 1,229 French 18-65-year-old women recruited by general practitioners. Women were categorized into three educational level groups: low (LEL: 43.9%), medium (MEL: 33.4%) and high (HEL: 22.6%). RESULTS: Knowledge about CC and its prevention was lower among LEL women. In the 180 mothers of 14-18-year-old daughters (99 LEL, 54 MEL, 45 HEL), acceptance of HPV vaccine was higher in LEL (60.4%) and MEL (68.6%) than in HEL mothers (46.8%). Among LEL mothers, those who were favourable to HPV vaccination were more likely to be young (OR = 8.44 [2.10-34.00]), to be vaccinated against hepatitis B (OR = 4.59 [1.14-18.52]), to have vaccinated their children against pneumococcus (OR = 3.52 [0.99-12.48]) and to present a history of abnormal Pap smear (OR = 6.71 [0.70-64.01]). CONCLUSION: Although LEL women had poorer knowledge about CC and its prevention, they were more likely to accept HPV vaccination than HEL mothers.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination , Young Adult
4.
Int J Public Health ; 59(3): 519-28, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24756880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To use both quantitative and qualitative methods to investigate the evolution of practices and opinions regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among French general practitioners. METHODS: A cross-sectional study (self-questionnaires) was performed in 2007 and repeated in 2010 among 271 general practitioners. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on 27 voluntary participants by a sociologist and analyzed according to content analysis. RESULTS: Acceptability of HPV vaccination had increased from 2007 to 2010 (79.9 vs. 87.1%, respectively), just as the practice of HPV vaccination among 14-year-old girls (19.0 vs. 49.1%, respectively). Though about 60% reported complications associated with HPV vaccination, irrespective of year, the types of difficulties have varied: difficulties related to "questions asked by patients" had decreased, though concerns about side effects had remained stable. During interviews, difficulties related to "the reason for medical consultation" and "the target age" were often associated with addressing the issue of sexuality, especially when the parents were present. CONCLUSIONS: Although the high level of acceptability of HPV vaccination among general practitioners, which increased from 2007 to 2010, there remain difficulties in addressing this practice.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , General Practitioners/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Age Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Residence Characteristics , Sex Factors
5.
Eur J Public Health ; 23(6): 1046-53, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23430762

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Having been vaccinated against the human papilloma virus (HPV) may affect other behaviours related to sexual health. This study assessed knowledge and behaviour relevant to the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among girls/women aged 14-23 years in relation to their HPV vaccination status. METHODS: From November 2008 to February 2009, 328 girls/women from the Rhône-Alpes region were recruited by general practitioners and completed a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: In all, 316 of the 328 respondents provided information on their HPV vaccination status: 135 (42.7%) had been vaccinated (51.2% of girls aged 14-16 years, 44% of women aged 17-20 years and 18.9% of 21-23-year-olds). Knowledge about HPV and the Pap smear was poor overall but greater in those who had been vaccinated: vaccinated 14-16-year-olds were significantly more likely to know the aim of the Pap smear than those not vaccinated (72.7% vs. 41.3%, P < 0.001), and vaccinated 21-23-year-olds were more likely to know about the need to continue Pap smear screening, despite vaccination (60.0% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.06). Irrespective of vaccination status, >80% cited condoms as a means of STI prevention and >85% of those who were sexually active used them. No difference was observed between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups regarding requests for HIV serology, history of abortions or emergency hormonal contraception. CONCLUSION: Knowledge about cervical cancer prevention was better among those who had been vaccinated against HPV than among those who had not. Knowledge and behaviour relevant to STI prevention seemed appropriate whatever the respondents' vaccination status.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Age Factors , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Papanicolaou Test/psychology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/psychology , Vaginal Smears/psychology , Young Adult
6.
BMC Public Health ; 12: 1034, 2012 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23186288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In France, it is recommended that girls and women aged 14-23 are vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV). However, French women's knowledge of and attitude towards the vaccine has been little studied. METHODS: Thirty-nine general practitioners, representative of those working in the large Rhône-Alpes region, offered a self-administered questionnaire on cervical cancer (CC) prevention to all 18-65 year-old women who came for consultation during June and July 2008. In addition, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a sample of those who had daughters aged 14-18. RESULTS: Of the 1,478 women who completed the questionnaire, only 16.9% mentioned HPV as the cause of CC, even though 76.2% knew of the vaccine. 210 women had daughters aged 14-18, and 32 were interviewed. Compared with the wider group, more of these women were aware of the HPV vaccine (91.4%). 44.8% knew the target population and 17.1% the recommended ages for vaccination. 54.3% favoured HPV vaccination; 37.2% were undecided and only 0.9% were opposed. The main barrier to acceptance was the recency of the vaccine's introduction and concern about possible side effects (54.9%); 14.1% preferred to rely on their GP's decision. Factors associated with acceptance of the HPV vaccine were having previously vaccinated a child against pneumococcus (OR=3.28 [1.32-8.11]) and knowing the target population for HPV vaccination (OR=2.12 [1.15-3.90]). Knowing the recommended frequency of Papanicolaou smear testing (Pap test) screening was associated with lower acceptance (OR=0.32 [0.13-0.82]). CONCLUSIONS: Few mothers are opposed to HPV vaccination. Factors associated with acceptability were knowledge about the vaccine, acceptance of other vaccines and, unexpectedly, lack of knowledge about the recommended frequency of Pap testing. On multivariate analysis, compliance with recommendations for Pap test screening and socioeconomic factors had no effect on views about HPV vaccination. Given that concern about possible side effects is the major barrier to wider acceptance of the HPV vaccine in France, GPs have a key role in providing information.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Women/psychology , Adolescent , Animals , Female , France , Humans , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...