Summary report on the ISOBM TD-4 Workshop: analysis of 56 monoclonal antibodies against the MUC1 mucin. San Diego, Calif., November 17-23, 1996.

Sixteen research groups participated in the ISOBM TD-4 Workshop in which the reactivity and specificity of 56 monoclonal antibodies against the MUC1 mucin was investigated using a diverse panel of target antigens and MUC1 mucin-related synthetic peptides and glycopeptides. The majority of antibodies (34/56) defined epitopes located within the 20-amino acid tandem repeat sequence of the MUC1 mucin protein core. Of the remaining 22 antibodies, there was evidence for the involvement of carbohydrate residues in the epitopes for 16 antibodies. There was no obvious relationship between the type of immunogen and the specificity of each antibody. Synthetic peptides and glycopeptides were analyzed for their reactivity with each antibody either by assay of direct binding (e.g. by ELISA or BiaCore) or by determining the capacity of synthetic ligands to inhibit antibody binding interactions. There was good concordance between the research groups in identifying antibodies reactive with peptide epitopes within the MUC1 protein core. Epitope mapping tests were performed using the Pepscan analysis for antibody reactivity against overlapping synthetic peptides, and results were largely consistent between research groups. The dominant feature of epitopes within the MUC1 protein core was the presence, in full or part, of the hydrophilic sequence of PDTRAPAP. Carbohydrate epitopes were less easily characterized and the most useful reagents in this respect were defined oligosaccharides, rather than purified mucin preparations enriched in particular carbohydrate moieties. It was evident that carbohydrate residues were involved in many epitopes, by regulating epitope accessibility or masking determinants, or by stabilizing preferred conformations of peptide epitopes within the MUC1 protein core. Overall, the studies, highlight concordance between groups rather than exposing inconsistencies which gives added confidence to the results of analyses of the specificity of antimucin monoclonal antibodies.

Analysis of the role of type 1 core O-glycans in the binding of anti-MUC1 antibodies by cytofluorometry and synthetic peptide/glycopeptide binding inhibition studies.

A panel of 56 MAbs submitted to the ISOBM TD-4 (MUC1) Workshop were analysed in two systems. These systems were designed to screen for peptide type 1 core O-glycan-related reactivities. Using synthetic MUC1 mucin-related peptides and glycopeptides, the panel of MAbs were tested for relative binding affinities to type 1 core O-glycan-substituted MUC1 structures. These studies utilized a competitive binding format with a native human adenocarcinoma-derived mucin as a solid phase. This system allows for analysis of the type 1 core glycoform subspecificity of each MAb. The second approach taken in parallel, utilized MCF-7 (BrCa) and OVCAR (OVCa) cell lines which were grown in the presence or absence of phenyl-N-acetylgalactosaminide (p-gal), a blocker of mucin O-linked glycosylation. These cells were analysed by FACS to examine the role these same glycan substitutions play with regard to either the diagnostic or therapeutic application of these MAbs. By FACS analysis there was a consistent increased 'epitope exposure' for peptide-specific MAbs binding in the presence of p-gal. In addition, a single MAb (TD-4 #150) is interpreted to react with a type 1 core O-glycan, probably with Tn, TF or STn specificity.