Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 85(6): 2122-5, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18498839

ABSTRACT

Extra-aortic counterpulsation for the management of chronic heart failure is a novel approach. We report the use of an extra-aortic implantable counterpulsation pump in the management of a 73-year-old patient with severe heart failure refractory to medical therapy. The implantable counterpulsation pump prolonged his life and greatly improved its quality. The patient lived almost 7 months after the implantation of the device and died of septic complications secondary to gas line infection.


Subject(s)
Counterpulsation/instrumentation , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Abscess/diagnosis , Aged , Aortography , Chronic Disease , Echocardiography , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Palliative Care , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Prosthesis Design , Pseudomonas Infections/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 21(4): 547-53, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17678782

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that administration of a parasternal intercostal block using ropivacaine 0.75% improved analgesia in postoperative cardiac surgical patients. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: Ropivacaine 0.75% with 5 doses each side, total dosage 40 mL (300 mg), via parasternal intercostal injection or saline before insertion of the sternal wires and closure of the sternal wound. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At extubation, patients who had a parasternal intercostal block with ropivacaine had visual analog and numerical rating pain scores approximately 50% less than those in the saline group (29.5 [standard deviation (SD) = 24.3] v 53.2 [SD = 24.1], ropivacaine v saline, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients who received ropivacaine used approximately 50% less PCA morphine (12.0 [SD = 5.4] v 23.2 [SD = 8.3] total morphine equivalents in milligrams, ropivacaine v saline, respectively; p < 0.001) in the first 12 hours postoperatively, with a continued reduction in dosages for the ensuing 12 to 24 hours (18.8 [SD = 9.6] v 23.7 [SD = 10.0] total morphine equivalents in milligrams, ropivacaine v saline; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: A ropivacaine parasternal intercostal block is a safe, simple, and effective adjunct for optimizing of pain control and reducing opioid analgesics after adult cardiac surgery. This study provides clinicians with an effective treatment for sternal wound pain.


Subject(s)
Amides/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Intercostal Nerves/drug effects , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Adult , Aged , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Brachial Plexus/drug effects , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pain Measurement , Pneumonectomy/methods , Prospective Studies , Ropivacaine , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...