Interactions between Saccades and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in Marmosets.

Animals use a combination of eye movements to track moving objects. These different eye movements need to be coordinated for successful tracking, requiring interactions between the systems involved. Here, we study the interaction between the saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement systems in marmosets. Using a single-target pursuit task, we show that saccades cause an enhancement in pursuit following a saccade. Using a two-target pursuit task, we show that this enhancement in pursuit is selective toward the motion of the target selected by the saccade, irrespective of any biases in pursuit prior to the saccade. These experiments highlight the similarities in the functioning of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement systems across primates.

Interactions between saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements in marmosets.

Animals use a combination of eye movements to track moving objects. These different eye movements need to be coordinated for successful tracking, requiring interactions between the systems involved. Here, we study the interaction between the saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement systems in marmosets. Using a single target pursuit task, we show that saccades cause an enhancement in pursuit following a saccade. Using a two-target pursuit task, we show that this enhancement in pursuit is selective towards the motion of the target selected by the saccade, irrespective of any biases in pursuit prior to the saccade. These experiments highlight the similarities in the functioning of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement systems across primates. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We study the coordination between the smooth-pursuit and saccadic eye movement systems in marmosets using single and multiple object motions. We find that saccade to a target increases pursuit velocity towards the target. If multiple objects are visible, saccade choice makes pursuit more selective towards the saccade target. Our results show that coordination between different eye movement systems to successfully track moving objects is similar between marmosets and primates.

Mammals Achieve Common Neural Coverage of Visual Scenes Using Distinct Sampling Behaviors.

Most vertebrates use head and eye movements to quickly change gaze orientation and sample different portions of the environment with periods of stable fixation. Visual information must be integrated across fixations to construct a complete perspective of the visual environment. In concert with this sampling strategy, neurons adapt to unchanging input to conserve energy and ensure that only novel information from each fixation is processed. We demonstrate how adaptation recovery times and saccade properties interact and thus shape spatiotemporal tradeoffs observed in the motor and visual systems of mice, cats, marmosets, macaques, and humans. These tradeoffs predict that in order to achieve similar visual coverage over time, animals with smaller receptive field sizes require faster saccade rates. Indeed, we find comparable sampling of the visual environment by neuronal populations across mammals when integrating measurements of saccadic behavior with receptive field sizes and V1 neuronal density. We propose that these mammals share a common statistically driven strategy of maintaining coverage of their visual environment over time calibrated to their respective visual system characteristics.

Ocular following Eye Movements in Marmosets Follow Complex Motion Trajectories.

Ocular following eye movements help stabilize images on the retina and offer a window to study motion interpretation by visual circuits. We use these ocular following eye movements to study motion integration behavior in the marmosets. We characterize ocular following responses in the marmosets using different moving stimuli such as dot patterns, gratings, and plaids. Marmosets track motion along different directions and exhibit spatial frequency and speed sensitivity, which closely matches the sensitivity reported in neurons from their motion-selective area MT. Marmosets are also able to track the integrated motion of plaids, with tracking direction consistent with an intersection of constraints model of motion integration. Marmoset ocular following responses are similar to responses in macaques and humans with certain species-specific differences in peak sensitivities. Such motion-sensitive eye movement behavior in combination with direct access to cortical circuitry makes the marmoset model well suited to study the neural basis of motion integration.

Mammals achieve common neural coverage of visual scenes using distinct sampling behaviors.

Most vertebrates use head and eye movements to quickly change gaze orientation and sample different portions of the environment with periods of stable fixation. Visual information must be integrated across several fixations to construct a more complete perspective of the visual environment. In concert with this sampling strategy, neurons adapt to unchanging input to conserve energy and ensure that only novel information from each fixation is processed. We demonstrate how adaptation recovery times and saccade properties interact, and thus shape spatiotemporal tradeoffs observed in the motor and visual systems of different species. These tradeoffs predict that in order to achieve similar visual coverage over time, animals with smaller receptive field sizes require faster saccade rates. Indeed, we find comparable sampling of the visual environment by neuronal populations across mammals when integrating measurements of saccadic behavior with receptive field sizes and V1 neuronal density. We propose that these mammals share a common statistically driven strategy of maintaining coverage of their visual environment over time calibrated to their respective visual system characteristics.

Cortical and hippocampal dynamics under logical fragmentation of environmental space.

Navigation is often constrained to pathways, and a recurring problem concerns whether to turn left or right when approaching an intersection. We examined this problem during T-maze performance in which the maze location in the recording environment varied over five-trial blocks and analyzed the associated positional firing patterns of hippocampal CA1 and posterior parietal cortex neurons. An arbitrary partitioning of the environmental space determined the left versus right turning rule for T-maze behavior. Under these conditions, rats learned the logical fragmentation of allocentric space into left turn and right turn sub-regions. Paradoxically, under these conditions, the spatial tuning of both posterior parietal cortex and hippocampal CA1 neurons followed the frame of reference given by the T-maze, as opposed to the location in the environment. Moreover, first trials within each block were associated with distinct firing rate changes for both posterior parietal cortex and hippocampal CA1 neurons. These data support a model where spatial tuning by hippocampus and cortex can interact to guide choice behavior in complex, path-based environments where a correct turn choice varies across environmental locations, and as a function of recent experience.

Natural binocular depth discrimination behavior in mice explained by visual cortical activity.

In mice and other mammals, forebrain neurons integrate right and left eye information to generate a three-dimensional representation of the visual environment. Neurons in the visual cortex of mice are sensitive to binocular disparity,1-3 yet it is unclear whether that sensitivity is linked to the perception of depth.4-8 We developed a natural task based on the classic visual cliff and pole descent tasks to estimate the psychophysical range of mouse depth discrimination.5,9 Mice with binocular vision descended to a near (shallow) surface more often when surrounding far (deep) surfaces were progressively more distant. Occlusion of one eye severely impaired their ability to target the near surface. We quantified the distance at which animals make their decisions to estimate the binocular image displacement of the checkerboard pattern on the near and far surfaces. Then, we assayed the disparity sensitivity of large populations of binocular neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) using two-photon microscopy2 and quantitatively compared this information available in V1 to their behavioral sensitivity. Disparity information in V1 matches the behavioral performance over the range of depths examined and was resistant to changes in binocular alignment. These findings reveal that mice naturally use stereoscopic cues to guide their behavior and indicate a neural basis for this depth discrimination task.