Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 25(7): 362-7, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24170619

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: With the focus of modern health care on preventive care, and the well-known benefits of smoking cessation on improving health and reducing healthcare costs, smoking cessation is a key focus of healthcare reform. To change the smoking habits of the U.S. population, two strategies are of particular importance to healthcare professionals: promoting tobacco-free environments in healthcare systems and expanding affordable and effective treatments. DATA SOURCES: Recent policy literature. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to providing smoking cessation counseling most frequently cited by healthcare professionals are lack of training and poor reimbursement; however, recent legislation, for example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), should make preventive services more available and affordable. Nurse practitioners (NPs) have vast experience in addressing health promotion and disease prevention, and are therefore well placed to lead this reform. However, despite consistently higher referrals of tobacco-dependent patients for smoking cessation interventions than any other group of healthcare provider, evidence suggests that NPs are not adequately trained to treat this addiction. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article is a call to action for NPs to become familiar with the tobacco cessation policy changes affecting clinical practice, to become experts in tobacco treatment, and to take the lead in this healthcare reform initiative.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Nurse Practitioners , Nurse's Role , Smoking Cessation , Humans , United States
2.
Am J Public Health ; 86(11): 1551-6, 1996 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8916519

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed measles vaccination rates and risk factors for lack of vaccination among preschool children enrolled in the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) during the 1991 measles epidemic in New York City. METHODS: Children aged 12 to 59 months presenting for WIC certification between April 1 and September 30, 1991, at six volunteer WIC sites in New York City were surveyed. RESULTS: Of the 6181 children enrolled in the study, measles immunization status was ascertained for 6074 (98%). Overall measles coverage was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] = +/- 1%) and at least 90% by 21 months of age (95% CI = +/- 1%). Young age of the child, use of a private provider, and Medicaid as a source of health care payment were risk factors for lack of vaccination (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: During the peak of a measles epidemic, measles immunization rates were more than 80% by 24 months of age in a sample of WIC children. The ease of ascertaining immunization status and the size of the total WIC population underscore the importance of WIC immunization initiatives.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Food Services , Measles Vaccine , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Risk Factors
3.
JAMA ; 274(4): 312-6, 1995 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7609260

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of different interventions to increase measles vaccination coverage among preschool children enrolled in the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). DESIGN: Public health intervention trial. SETTING: Six volunteer WIC sites in New York City. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 12 to 59 months presenting for WIC certification between April 1 and September 30, 1991, who were eligible for measles vaccination. INTERVENTIONS: Two WIC sites were assigned at random to one of three immunization strategies: (1) escort: child was escorted to a nearby pediatric clinic for immunization; (2) voucher incentive: the family returned monthly, rather than every 2 months, to pick up WIC food vouchers until the child was immunized; or (3) referral: the family was passively referred for immunization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of eligible children receiving measles vaccination. RESULTS: Of children eligible for measles immunization, 74% (618/836) were immunized. Children at escort sites were 5.5 times (relative risk [RR] = 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7 to 8.1) and those at voucher incentive sites were 2.9 times (RR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.5) more likely to be immunized than children at referral sites. Children were immunized more rapidly at escort sites (median, 14 days) and voucher incentive sites (median, 26 days) than at referral sites (median, 45 days; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both escort and voucher incentive models resulted in more children being immunized more rapidly than passive referral. Because of ease of administration, voucher incentives may be a more suitable immunization intervention for use at WIC sites, with addition of escort where feasible.


Subject(s)
Food Services , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Measles Vaccine , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Motivation , Multivariate Analysis , New York City , Patient Dropouts , Poverty Areas , Urban Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...