Spontaneous reperfusion enhances succinate concentration in peripheral blood from stemi patients but its levels does not correlate with myocardial infarct size or area at risk.

Succinate is enhanced during initial reperfusion in blood from the coronary sinus in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and in pigs submitted to transient coronary occlusion. Succinate levels might have a prognostic value, as they may correlate with edema volume or myocardial infarct size. However, blood from the coronary sinus is not routinely obtained in the CathLab. As succinate might be also increased in peripheral blood, we aimed to investigate whether peripheral plasma concentrations of succinate and other metabolites obtained during coronary revascularization correlate with edema volume or infarct size in STEMI patients. Plasma samples were obtained from peripheral blood within the first 10 min of revascularization in 102 STEMI patients included in the COMBAT-MI trial (initial TIMI 1) and from 9 additional patients with restituted coronary blood flow (TIMI 2). Metabolite concentrations were analyzed by 1H-NMR. Succinate concentration averaged 0.069 ± 0.0073 mmol/L in patients with TIMI flow ≤ 1 and was significantly increased in those with TIMI 2 at admission (0.141 ± 0.058 mmol/L, p < 0.05). However, regression analysis did not detect any significant correlation between most metabolite concentrations and infarct size, extent of edema or other cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) variables. In conclusion, spontaneous reperfusion in TIMI 2 patients associates with enhanced succinate levels in peripheral blood, suggesting that succinate release increases overtime following reperfusion. However, early plasma levels of succinate and other metabolites obtained from peripheral blood does not correlate with the degree of irreversible injury or area at risk in STEMI patients, and cannot be considered as predictors of CMR variables.Trial registration: Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02404376) on 31/03/2015. EudraCT number: 2015-001000-58.

Sex bias in admission to tertiary-care centres for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on sex-specific outcomes and management of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CS-STEMI). We investigated whether any sex bias exists in the admission to revascularization capable hospitals (RCH) or intensive cardiac care units (ICCU) and its impact on in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We used the Spanish National Health System Minimum Basic Data from 2003 to 2015 to identify patients with CS-STEMI. The primary outcome was sex differences in in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 340 490 STEMI patients, 20 262 (6%) had CS and 29.2% were female. CS incidence was higher in women than in men (7.9% vs 5.1%, P = .001). Women were older and had more hypertension and diabetes, and were less often admitted to RCH than men (from 58.7% in 2003 to 79.6% in 2015; and from 61.9% in 2003 to 85.3% in 2015; respectively, P = .01), and to ICCU centres (25.7% vs 29.2%, P = .001). Adjusted mortality was higher in women than men over time (from 79.5 ± 4.3% to 65.8 ± 6.5%; and from 67.8 ± 6% to 58.1 ± 6.5%; respectively, P < .001). ICCU availability was associated with higher use of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in women (46.8% to 67.2%; P < .001) but was even higher in men (54.8% to 77.4%; P < .001). In ICCU centres, adjusted mortality rates decreased in both sexes, but lower in women (from 74.9 ± 5.4% to 66.3 ± 6.6%) than in men (from 67.8 ± 6.0% to 58.1 ± 6.5%, P < .001). Female sex was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.10-1.27, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Women with CS-STEMI were less referred to tertiary-care centres and had a higher adjusted in-hospital mortality than men.

Estrategia invasiva frente a conservadora en pacientes frágiles con IAMSEST. Diseño del ensayo clínico MOSCA-FRAIL / Invasive versus conservative strategy in frail patients with NSTEMI: the MOSCA-FRAIL clinical trial study design

Introducción y objetivos: Aunque las guías de práctica clínica recomiendan una estrategia invasiva para el infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST (IAMSEST), en la práctica clínica esta estrategia se infrautiliza en ancianos frágiles. Además estos enfermos habitualmente quedan excluidos de los ensayos clínicos, por lo que la evidencia es escasa. Nuestra hipótesis es que una estrategia invasiva para el anciano con fragilidad y IAMSEST mejorará el pronóstico. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico y aleatorizado que compara una estrategia invasiva frente a una conservadora en ancianos frágiles con IAMSEST. Los criterios de inclusión son: IAMSEST, edad ≥ 70 años y fragilidad definida por al menos 4 criterios de la escala Clinical Frailty Scale. Se aleatorizará a los participantes a una estrategia invasiva (coronariografía y revascularización si se considera anatómicamente indicada) o conservadora (tratamiento médico y coronariografía solo en caso de inestabilidad clínica persistente). El objetivo principal será el número de días vivo fuera del hospital durante el primer año. El objetivo coprincipal será el tiempo hasta la presentación de muerte cardiovascular, reinfarto agudo de miocardio o revascularización tras el alta. El tamaño de la muestra estimado es de 178 pacientes (89 por grupo), asumiendo un incremento del 20% en la proporción de días vivo fuera del hospital con la estrategia invasiva. Resultados: Los resultados del estudio aportarán información novedosa para el tratamiento del anciano frágil con IAMSEST. Conclusiones: Nuestra hipótesis es que una estrategia invasiva mejorará el pronóstico de los pacientes ancianos frágiles con IAMSEST. Si esta hipótesis se confirmara, la situación de fragilidad no debería disuadir al cardiólogo de indicar un tratamiento invasivo. Ensayo registrado en ClinicalTrials.gov (Identificador: NCT03208153)

Introduction and objectives: Although clinical guidelines recommend invasive management in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), this strategy is underused in frail elderly patients in the real world. Furthermore, these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and therefore the evidence is scarce. Our hypothesis is that an invasive strategy will improve prognosis in elderly frail patients with NSTEMI. Methods: This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, in which the conservative and invasive strategies will be compared in patients meeting all of the following inclusion criteria: NSTEMI diagnosis, age ≥ 70 years, and frailty defined by a category ≥ 4 in the Clinical Frailty Scale. Participants will be randomized to an invasive (coronary angiogram and revascularization if anatomically amenable) or conservative (medical treatment and coronary angiogram only if persistent clinical instability) strategy. The primary endpoint will be the number of days alive out of hospital during the first year. The coprimary endpoint will be the time until the first cardiac event (cardiac death, reinfarction or postdischarge revascularization). We estimate a sample size of 178 patients (89 per arm), considering an increase of 20% in the proportion of days alive out of hospital with the invasive management. Results: The results of this study will add important knowledge to inform the management of frail elderly patients hospitalized with NSTEMI. Conclusions: We hypothesize that the invasive strategy will improve outcomes in frail elderly patients with NSTEMI. If this is confirmed, frailty status should not dissuade physicians from implementing an invasive management strategy. Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov .Identifier: NCT03208153

Invasive Versus Conservative Strategy in Frail Patients With NSTEMI: The MOSCA-FRAIL Clinical Trial Study Design.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Although clinical guidelines recommend invasive management in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), this strategy is underused in frail elderly patients in the real world. Furthermore, these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and therefore the evidence is scarce. Our hypothesis is that an invasive strategy will improve prognosis in elderly frail patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, in which the conservative and invasive strategies will be compared in patients meeting all of the following inclusion criteria: NSTEMI diagnosis, age ≥ 70 years, and frailty defined by a category ≥ 4 in the Clinical Frailty Scale. Participants will be randomized to an invasive (coronary angiogram and revascularization if anatomically amenable) or conservative (medical treatment and coronary angiogram only if persistent clinical instability) strategy. The primary endpoint will be the number of days alive out of hospital during the first year. The coprimary endpoint will be the time until the first cardiac event (cardiac death, reinfarction or postdischarge revascularization). We estimate a sample size of 178 patients (89 per arm), considering an increase of 20% in the proportion of days alive out of hospital with the invasive management. RESULTS: The results of this study will add important knowledge to inform the management of frail elderly patients hospitalized with NSTEMI. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize that the invasive strategy will improve outcomes in frail elderly patients with NSTEMI. If this is confirmed, frailty status should not dissuade physicians from implementing an invasive management strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.Identifier: NCT03208153.

Randomized comparison between the invasive and conservative strategies in comorbid elderly patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Comorbid elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) are underrepresented in randomized trials and undergo fewer cardiac catheterizations according to registries. Our aim was to compare the conservative and invasive strategies in these patients. METHODS: Randomized multicenter study, including 106 patients (January 2012-March 2014) with non-STEMI, over 70years and with comorbidities defined by at least two of the following: peripheral artery disease, cerebral vascular disease, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure or anemia. Patients were randomized to invasive (routine coronary angiogram, n=52) or conservative (coronary angiogram only if recurrent ischemia or heart failure, n=54) strategy. Medical treatment was identical. The main endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, reinfarction and readmission for cardiac cause (postdischarge revascularization or heart failure), at long-term (2.5-year follow-up). Analysis of cumulative event rate (incidence rate ratio=IRR) and time to first event (hazard ratio=HR), were performed. RESULTS: Cardiac catheterization/revascularization rates were 100%/58% in the invasive versus 20%/9% in the conservative arm. There were no differences between groups in the main endpoint (invasive vs conservative: IRR=0.946, 95% CI 0.466-1.918, p=0.877) at long-term. The invasive strategy, however, tended to improve 3-month outcomes in terms of mortality (HR=0.348, 95% CI 0.122-0.991, p=0.048), and of mortality or ischemic events (reinfarction or postdischarge revascularization) (HR=0.432, 95% CI 0.190-0.984, p=0.046). This benefit declined during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive management did not modify long-term outcome in comorbid elderly patients with non-STEMI. The finding of a tendency towards an improvement in the short-term needs confirmation in larger studies (clinicaltrials.govNCT1645943).

The role of the ECG in diagnosis, risk estimation, and catheterization laboratory activation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus document.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most widely used imaging tool helping in diagnosis and initial management of patients presenting with symptoms compatible with acute coronary syndrome. Acute ischemia affects the configuration of the QRS complexes, the ST segments and the T waves. The ECG should be read along with the clinical assessment of the patient. ST segment elevation (and ST depression in leads V1 -V3 ) in patients with active symptoms usually indicates acute occlusion of an epicardial artery with ongoing transmural ischemia. These patients should be triaged for emergent reperfusion therapy per current guidelines. However, many patients have ST segment elevation secondary to nonischemic causes. ST depression in leads other than V1 -V3 usually are indicative of subendocardial ischemia secondary to subocclusion of the epicardial artery, distal embolization to small arteries or spasm supply/demand mismatch. ST depression may also be secondary to nonischemic etiologies, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiomyopathies, etc. Knowing the clinical scenario, comparison to previous ECG and subsequent ECGs (in cases that there are changes in the quality or severity of symptoms) may add in the diagnosis and interpretation in difficult cases. This review addresses the different ECG patterns, typically seen in patients with active symptoms, after resolution of symptoms and the significance of such changes when seen in asymptomatic patients.

Pre-treatment with the Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor cariporide delays cell-to-cell electrical uncoupling during myocardial ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Inhibition of Na(+)-H(+) exchange (NHE) delays the onset of myocardial rigor contracture during ischemia. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of NHE inhibition on cell-to-cell electrical uncoupling during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. METHODS: Twenty-six isolated rat hearts and 23 in situ porcine hearts were submitted to no-flow ischemia followed by reperfusion, with or without pre-treatment with cariporide (7 microM in rats and 3 mg/kg in pigs). Ischemic rigor and hypercontracture, conduction velocity and myocardial electrical impedance were monitored. RESULTS: Pre-treatment with cariporide delayed ATP depletion (luminescence assay in rat myocardium) and onset of rigor contracture (tension recordings or ultrasonic crystals) during ischemia both in rat and pig hearts (P<0.05). In addition, cariporide delayed the onset of sharp changes in tissue resistivity and phase angle in impedance recordings (four-electrode probes) from 10+/-1 to 13+/-1 min (P<0.001) in rat hearts, and from 22+/-1 to 38+/-2 min (P<0.001) in pigs. Blockade of impulse propagation (transmembrane action potentials in rat hearts) was also markedly delayed by cariporide (from 14+/-1 to 20+/-1 min, P<0.001). Reperfusion-induced LDH release in rat hearts and infarct size in pigs were markedly reduced by pre-treatment with cariporide. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of NHE with cariporide slows the progression of ischemic injury during myocardial ischemia, and delays the onset of cell-to-cell electrical uncoupling.