Age should be considered in the decision making of prophylactic splenic angioembolization in nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma: a study of 208 consecutive civilian trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: A strategy of prophylactic splenic angioembolization using observation failure risk (OFR) computed tomographic (CT) scan criteria has been proposed recently. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate the relevance of the criteria in terms of delayed splenic rupture in patients with blunt splenic injury. METHODS: All patients with blunt splenic injuries admitted consecutively between January 2005 and January 2010 to our institution were included. Clinical, CT scan, and angiographic data, initial management, and outcome were noted. Patients managed expectantly were classified according to OFR CT scan criteria (high OFR was defined by at least one of the following CT scan signs: blush, pseudoaneurysm, Organ Injury Scale [OIS] grade III with a large hemoperitoneum, and OIS grade IV or 5). Initial management success was especially studied. RESULTS: Among the 208 patients included, 161 (77%) were treated by observation (35 OIS grade I, 64 OIS grade II, 33 OIS grade III, 18 OIS grade IV, and 11 OIS grade V) and 129 (80%) were men, with a mean (SD) age of 36.1 (18.7) years and a mean (SD) Injury Severity Score of 20.8 (15.4). Forty-nine patients (30%) had high OFR CT scan criteria. Thirteen patients (8%) experienced observation failure. High OFR CT scan criteria (odds ratio, 11; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-47.5) and patients 50 years and older (odds ratio, 33.9; 95% confidence interval, 6.2-185.5) were independent factors related to observation failure. The positive predictive value of OFR CT scan criteria for observation failure was 18%, and the negative predictive value was 96%. The corresponding values were 67% and 90%, respectively, in patients 50 years and older and 3% and 99%, respectively, in patients younger than 50 years. CONCLUSION: OFR CT scan criteria lack specificity to predict observation failure, mainly in patients younger than 50 years. Age should be considered when identifying patients requiring prophylactic splenic angioembolization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level III.

A new index derived from the cerebrovascular pressure transmission and correlated with consciousness recovery in severely head-injured intensive care patients.

BACKGROUND: In patients with serious head trauma, a moderate (20-25 mm Hg) mean level of intracranial pressure (ICP) may fail to distinguish patients with a real deteriorated intracranial status from those who are stable or improving. Because of these limitations, we analyzed the ICP curve in search of other relevant information regarding cerebrovascular pressure transmission. We looked for parameters with physiological meaning extracted from spectral analysis of cerebrovascular pressure transmission and correlated with consciousness recovery in patients with severe head injuries. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in an intensive care unit of the University Hospital, Montpellier, France, from December 2003 to December 2005. Thirty consecutive patients admitted for severe head trauma were subjected to sedatives, mechanical ventilation, and intraparenchymatous recording of ICP and were evaluated with Glasgow Outcome Scale score. Simultaneous 60-s recordings of ICP and arterial blood pressure (BP) signals, beginning as soon as possible after head trauma, were repeated until death or clinical stabilization, every 15 min, with physicians blinded to the patients' data. Spectra of ICP and BP waveforms were computed with Fourier transform. Amplitudes of cardiac and respiratory harmonics were analyzed. Cardiac (or respiratory) gain was defined as the ratio of amplitudes of cardiac (or respiratory) harmonic of ICP to BP signals and referred to as Gc and Gr, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty of the 30 enrolled patients recovered consciousness (Glasgow Outcome Scale score = 3, 4, or 5). Gr/Gc averaged over the whole recording period performed better in discriminating consciousness recovery (area under receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-1) than ICP (0.76; 95% CI: 0.54-0.97), cerebral perfusion pressure (0.75; 95% CI: 0.53-0.97) and Gc (0.77; 95% CI: 0.57-0.99) (P < 0.001 for each comparison). When considering the recording period 30 h posttrauma (hpt), 162 hpt, a value of Gr/Gc > or =4 was always associated with consciousness recovery, and the relative risk was equal to 9 (95% CI: 1.42-57.12). CONCLUSIONS: Gr/Gc, which characterizes the cerebrovascular transmission, better discriminates bad evolution than high values of ICP or low values of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with severe head trauma. A reduction in Gr/Gc ratio might be an early alarm signaling worsening intracranial hemodynamic conditions.