Diabetes-related symptoms, acute complications and management of diabetes mellitus of patients who are receiving palliative care: a protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, an estimated 40 million people are in need of palliative care each year, but only 14% receive it. The incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients receiving palliative care is higher than in the general population. This association is intended to grow as a result of the rising burden of DM worldwide, ageing populations and the improved overall survival time of several diseases over the last few decades. Recommendations for DM management in the context of palliative care are mainly based on expert opinion as there is a lack of suitable evidence base and randomised clinical trials in palliative care are scarce. The aim of our systematic review is to identify the best DM management practices in order to reduce important DM-related symptoms and acute complications in patients receiving palliative care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The authors will study the DM treatment and management literature, surveying the different approaches employed to treat adult palliative patients. Core health bibliographic databases will be searched from January 1990 to May 2019. Data sources will include Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and grey literature. Details regarding diet, oral and injectable glucose-lowering medicines, insulin regimens and blood glucose monitoring strategies will be evaluated. We defined the primary outcomes to compare between DM management approaches as the presence of symptoms (polyuria, polydipsia and polyphagia) and acute complications of DM (hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state and diabetic ketoacidosis), and secondary outcomes as hospital admissions and deaths due to DM-related complications, health-related quality of life and glycaemic control. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The systematic review methodology does not require ethics approval due to the nature of the study design. The results of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be publicly available. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018115772.

First Population-Based Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Portugal.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs in Portugal is one of the lowest mentioned in the literature. This phenomenon can be justified either by a low prevalence of the disease or by its low detection rate. To date, the prevalence of the pathology is unknown. The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence of AAA and its associated risk factors, in men aged ≥65 years and to evaluate the population's disease awareness. METHODS: All males aged ≥65 years registered in a Portuguese primary health care unit were invited to participate. The abdominal aorta was measured by ultrasound (inner to inner method). Concomitant risk factors and patient's AAA awareness were also assessed. An aortic diameter >30 mm was considered aneurysmatic. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-three patients were invited for the screening. Of these, 715 participated in the study (participation rate of 76.6%). The AAA prevalence in this sample was 2.1%. Eighty-five percent of the evaluated patients had never heard of the disease before. The mean age of the assessed population was 72.3 years; Multiple logistic regression analysis showed a positive association between AAA and history of smoking (odds ratio [OR] 8.8, P = 0.037) and history of dyslipidemia (OR 9.6, P = 0.035). A negative association was found between diabetes and AAA (OR 0.33, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The found prevalence shows that a significant number of potentially fatal AAAs remains to be diagnosed in Portugal. These results highlight the need for an effective program of AAA detection in Portugal. The lack of awareness in the Portuguese population for this pathology should also prompt reflexion.