Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Virol ; 96(4): e29603, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619025

ABSTRACT

This study aims to assess the safety, virological, and clinical outcomes of convalescent plasma transfusion (CPT) in immunocompromised patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included all immunosuppressed patients with COVID-19 and RNAemia from May 2020 to March 2023 treated with CPT. We included 81 patients with hematological malignancies (HM), transplants, or autoimmune diseases (69% treated with anti-CD20). Sixty patients (74%) were vaccinated, and 14 had pre-CPT serology >264 BAU/mL. The median delay between symptom onset and CPT was 23 days [13-31]. At D7 post-CPT, plasma PCR was negative in 43/64 patients (67.2%), and serology became positive in 25/30 patients (82%). Post-CPT positive serology was associated with RNAemia negativity (p < 0.001). The overall mortality rate at D28 was 26%, being higher in patients with non-B-cell HM (62%) than with B-cell HM (25%) or with no HM (11%) (p = 0.02). Patients receiving anti-CD20 without chemotherapy had the lowest mortality rate (8%). Positive RNAemia at D7 was associated with mortality at D28 in univariate analysis (HR: 3.05 [1.14-8.19]). Eight patients had adverse events, two of which were severe but transient. Our findings suggest that CPT can abolish RNAemia and ameliorate the clinical course in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , Blood Component Transfusion , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Cohort Studies , Plasma , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Immunocompromised Host , Viremia
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e1369-e1378, 2023 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35792621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Determining the etiology of aortitis is often challenging, in particular to distinguish infectious aortitis (IA) and noninfectious aortitis (NIA). This study aims to describe and compare the clinical, biological, and radiological characteristics of IA and NIA and their outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 10 French centers, including patients with aortitis between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three patients were included. Of these, 66 had IA (36.1%); the causative organism was Enterobacterales and streptococci in 18.2% each, Staphylococcus aureus in 13.6%, and Coxiella burnetii in 10.6%. NIA was diagnosed in 117 patients (63.9%), mainly due to vasculitides (49.6%), followed by idiopathic aortitis (39.3%). IA was more frequently associated with aortic aneurysms compared with NIA (78.8% vs 17.6%, P < .001), especially located in the abdominal aorta (69.7% vs 23.1%, P < .001). Crude and adjusted survival were significantly lower in IA compared to NIA (P < .001 and P = .006, respectively). In the IA cohort, high American Society of Anesthesiologists score (hazard ratio [HR], 2.47 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.08-5.66]; P = .033) and free aneurysm rupture (HR, 9.54 [95% CI, 1.04-87.11]; P = .046) were significantly associated with mortality after adjusting for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity score. Effective empiric antimicrobial therapy, initiated before any microbial documentation, was associated with a decreased mortality (HR, 0.23, 95% CI, .08-.71]; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: IA was complicated by significantly higher mortality rates compared with NIA. An appropriate initial antibiotic therapy appeared as a protective factor in IA.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm , Aortitis , Communicable Diseases , Humans , Aortitis/epidemiology , Aortitis/complications , Aortitis/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Aortic Aneurysm/complications , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases/complications
3.
Infect Dis Now ; 51(3): 304-307, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the efficacy and safety of prolonged cefazolin course for Staphylococcus infection and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria carriage after treatment. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for blood stream infections (BSI) and osteoarticular infections (OAI) by methicillin susceptible staphylococcal species treated with cefazolin from January 2015 to July 2017. Rectal and nasal swabs were performed at cefazolin initiation and end of treatment to detect respectively methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included, 41 had a bacteremia including 22 endocarditis and 22 OAI. Mean duration of treatment was 21.5 days at a mean daily dose of 6.5g/d. Fifty-five (94.5%) received combination therapy. Fifty-two (89.7%) of patients achieved bacteriological cure. Four patients were ESBL carriers at inclusion. No additional ESBL or MRSA were detected by end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Cefazolin appears as an effective and safe treatment for BSI or osteoarticular infection and does not appear to select MRSA or ESBL.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cefazolin/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Aged , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bone Diseases, Infectious/drug therapy , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Cloxacillin/administration & dosage , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...