ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A high rate of unreliability is an issue in visual field (VF) testing, especially in elderly patients, and warrants patient education. We assessed whether subjective perception of the visual field test (VFT) is a good predictor of its reliability in different age groups and examined age differences in patients' awareness of VF damage. METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated 107 VFT results of 54 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Subjective perceptions were compared to reliability indices for cooperation analysis and to mean deviation results for VF damage analysis, and an age-segregated sub-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Kappa coefficients showed poor agreement between subjective and objective parameters. Nevertheless, there were age differences. Younger patients had a higher positive predictive value and sensitivity in cooperation analysis and a higher negative predictive value in VF damage analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perception of cooperation in VFT is a poor predictor of its reliability. Although young cooperative patients may be aware of their good cooperation, even the youngest are unaware of their poor performance. This emphasizes the importance of giving proper directions to all patients during VFT to obtain better reliability indices. Younger, healthy patients are more aware of their health status, than those with a damaged VF, regardless of age. Therefore, illness education is crucial in all glaucoma patients.
