Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Sleep Sci ; 15(Spec 1): 156-163, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35273762

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To compare the effects of self-selected and predetermined intensity on sleep quality and duration, daytime sleepiness, and sleep efficiency of adolescents with obesity after 12 weeks of aerobic training. Material and Methods: Thirty-seven adolescents (12 girls), 13-18 years old, with obesity (BMI = 95th) were randomized into a predetermined intensity group (PIG), exercise intensity around 60-70% of heart rate reserve; or self-selected intensity group (SIG), the adolescents chose the speed/intensity at the beginning of each session and were able to change it every 5 minutes. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were used to assess sleep outcomes. Results: No differences were observed for PSQI [0.00 ± 2.00 vs 1.38 ± 2.7; p=0.195; d=0.60 (moderate effect)], sleep duration [-0.95 ± 1.2 vs -0.35 ± 1.6; p=0.358; d=0.41 (small effect)], ESS [(2.10 ± 3.9 vs 1.15 ± 4.5; p=0.195; d=0.23 (small effect)], and sleep efficiency [(81.5 ± 24.0 vs 79.4 ± 17.0; p=0.8.14; d=0.10 (trivial effect)] for the PIG and SIG groups, respectively. Conclusion: Aerobic training at a self- selected or predetermined intensity does not modulate sleep quality, sleep duration and efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, independent of intensity.

2.
Rev. bras. cineantropom. desempenho hum ; 22: e73625, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1137244

ABSTRACT

Abstract The purpose of this present study was to develop and validate a prediction equation for body composition assessment using anthropometric measures of elderly women. This is cross-sectional correlational study with 243 older women ± 64.5 years old and body mass index (BMI) ± 28.70 kg/m². For the development of the equation it was utilized the method of hold-out sample validation. The participants were randomly divided into equation development group (96 elderly women) and a group for validation (147 elderly women). Total body mass, height, waist and hip circumferences, ratio waist-hip ratio and BMI were measured. The whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessed body composition (percentage of body fat, fat mass, and fat-free mass). The equations were developed using multiple linear regression, with validation by the stepwise method; the comparison of the equations was analyzed by the paired Student's t test and the analysis of residual scores by the method of Blant and Altman. The New Equation presents a strong correlation (R = 0.83) and (R² = 0.69), and a standard error of estimation equals to 3.21% for percentage body fat prediction. The mean difference between the estimations of percentage body fat from DXA and the New Equation was 0.11% (t(0,180); P = 0.850). Therefore, the New Equation had an accuracy of 93.5% and a total error of 1.8%. The body fat estimation in older women using this New Equation based on BMI and age is valid and accurate.


Resumo O objetivo do presente estudo foi desenvolver e validar uma equação de predição para avaliação da composição corporal utilizando-se medidas antropométricas de idosas. Este é um estudo transversal e correlacional com 243 idosas ± 64.5 anos de idade e índice de massa corporal (IMC) ± 28.70 kg/m². Para o desenvolvimento da equação utilizou-se o método de validação hold-out. As participantes foram divididas aleatoriamente em um grupo para desenvolvimento da equação (96 idosas) e um grupo para validação da equação (147 idosas). Massa corporal total, estatura, circunferências da cintura e quadril, relação cintura-quadril e IMC foram mensurados. A absorciometria por raios-X com dupla energia (DXA) para todo corpo foi utilizada para avaliação da composição corporal (percentual de gordura, massa gorda e massa livre de gordura). As equações foram desenvolvidas utilizando a regressão linear múltipla, com validação pelo método stepwise; a comparação das equações foi realizada pelo Teste T para amostras pareadas e análise dos escores residuais por meio do método de Bland e Waltman. A Nova Equação apresentou uma forte correlação (R = 0.83) e (R2 = 0.69), e uma estimativa de erro padrão de 3.21% para predição do percentual de gordura. A diferença média entre as estimativas de percentual de gordura pelo DXA e Nova Equação foi de 0.11% (t(0,180); P = 0.850). Assim, a Nova Equação teve uma precisão de 93.5% e um erro total de 1.8%. A estimativa do percentual de gordura em idosas usando a Nova Equação baseada no IMC e idade são válidos e precisos.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...