Selective use of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of carcinomas of the pancreatic head.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to assess the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the evaluation of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas in cases of diagnostic dilemma and to determine the strength of agreement between perceived pre-operative stage as determined by computerised tomography (CT) and EUS and histopathological stage. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatic EUS were identified from a computerised radiology database. The strengths of agreement between the radiological and histopathological stages were determined by the weighted kappa (Kw) statistic. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were identified. Of 37 patients with a pancreatic head mass on prior imaging, 32 had a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma confirmed by EUS, as did 11 of 21 patients with suspicious pancreatic head lesions. Twenty-five of 43 patients were deemed to have resectable carcinomas, and 2 patients had resectable mucinous lesions. In comparing CT and EUS in the 25 patients undergoing resection, the Kw for T and N stages was 0.250 (p = 0.05) and -0.080 (p = 0.288), respectively, for CT, compared with 0.738 (p = 0.0001) and 0.606 (p = 0.0001), respectively, for EUS. CONCLUSIONS: EUS was effective in assessing the resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, EUS held a significant 3-fold advantage over CT with regard to T stage and an even higher significant advantage with regard to N stage.

Progressive CT system technology and experience improve the perceived preoperative stage of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our goals were to measure the accuracy of specialist helical computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer, to determine the relative benefit of progressive CT system technology, and to determine the magnitude of any learning curve in radiological interpretation. METHODS: One hundred patients (median age, 70 years; range 27-86 years; 68 male) underwent a preoperative CT (73 helical [hCT], 27 multislice [mCT]), performed by a single specialist radiologist, followed by surgery within 3 weeks. The strength of the agreement between the perceived CT stage and the histopathological stage was determined for each CT system and also for four serial cohorts of 25 patients, by the weighted Kappa statistic (Kw). RESULTS: The Kw values for T, N, M1 liver, and M1 peritoneal stage were 0.40, 0.18, 0.36, and 0.09 for hCT, compared with 0.57, 0.67, 0.66 (all P < 0.001), and 0.24 (P = 0.06) for mCT. Serial Kw for T and N stages improved from 0.26 and -0.14 in the first quartile of patients to 0.61 and 0.73 (P < 0.001) in the last quartile of patients. CONCLUSION: The role of CT in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer is becoming stronger as CT technology improves.